Correcting Audience Externalities in Television Advertising

References

• Abrams Z, Schwarz M (2008) Ad auction design and user experience. Appl. Econom. Res. Bull. 2:98–105.Google Scholar
• Aggarwal G, Feldman J, Muthukrishnan SM, Pál M (2008) Sponsored search auctions with Markovian users. Proc. 4th Workshop Internet Network Econom. (WINE), 621–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Ellison G (2011) Position auctions with consumer search. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1213–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Dubé J-P, Mela CF (2010) Do digital video recorders influence consumers' brand purchases? J. Marketing Res. 47(6):998–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown TJ, Rothschild ML (1993) Reassessing the impact of television advertising clutter. J. Consumer Res. 20(1):138–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke RR, Srull TK (1988) Competitive interference and consumer memory for advertising. J. Consumer Res. 15(1):55–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P, Gupta S (1994) On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. J. Marketing Res. 31(1):128–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke EH (1971) Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11(Fall):17–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crampton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. (2006) Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ (1995) What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? J. Advertising Res. 35(1):37–47.Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Mawhinney DF (2001) Optimizing television program schedules using choice modeling. J. Marketing Res. 38(3):298–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey K (2006) Study: First ad does get more eyeballs. Media Life Magazine (August 21) http://www.medialifemagazine.com/study-first-ad-does-get-more-eyeballs/.Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2007) Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):242–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferencz J, Teixeira T (2010) How much does advertising really cost? Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gaither J (2011) Is there an alternative ratings source in our future? Richards Group (blog), February 2011, http://blog.richards.com/richards-connections-february-2011.Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Mahdian M (2008) Externalities in online advertising. 17th Internat. World Wide Web Conf., 161–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Shachar R (2001) Spatial competition in the network television industry. RAND J. Econom. 32(4):624–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011a) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):378–404.Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011b) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Gomes R, Immorlica N, Markakis E (2009) Externalities in keyword auctions: An empirical and theoretical assessment. Proc. 5th Workshop Internet Network Econom. (WINE), 172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groves T (1973) Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41(4):617–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halton JH, Smith GB (1964) Algorithm 247: Radical-inverse quasi-random point sequence. Comm. ACM 7(12):701–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Håstad J (1999) Clique is hard to approximate within n1 − ε. Acta Mathematica 182:105–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehiel P, Moldovanu B, Stacchetti E (1996) How (not) to sell nuclear weapons. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(4):814–829.Google Scholar
• Karp R (1972) Reducibility among combinatorial problems. Miller R, Thatcher J, eds. Complexity of Computer Computations (Plenum Press, New York), 85–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Mahdian M (2008) A cascade model for externalities in sponsored search. Proc. 4th Workshop Internet Network Econom. (WINE), 585–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Schechner S (2009) Cable industry weighs its approach to targeted ads. Wall Street Journal (May 27) B6.Google Scholar
• Mandese J (2004) Equitable's no longer questionable: Data reveals nets position some advertisers better than others. MediaPost's MediaDailyNews (September 17) http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/18344/#axzz2cXZPMbvG.Google Scholar
• Morgan D (2013) Want to shift ad dollars out of TV into Web video? Good luck with that. AdAge (March 15) http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/shift-ad-dollars-tv-web-video-good-luck/240393/.Google Scholar
• Myerson R (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Rassenti SJ, Smith VL, Bulfin RL (1982) A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):402–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Alpert MI (1984) An audience flow model of television viewing choice. Marketing Sci. 3(2):113–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Kamakura WA, Alpert MI (1992) Viewer preference segmentation and viewing choice models for network television. J. Advertising 21(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Kent RJ (2010) Predictors of the gap between program audiences and commercial audiences: An investigation using live tuning data. J. Marketing 74(3):18–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Kent RJ (2011) Introducing the Ad ECG: How the set-top box tracks. J. Advertising Res. 51(4):586–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott S (2010) A modern Bayesian look at the multi-armed bandit. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Indust. 26(6):639–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachar R, Emerson JW (2000) Cast demographics, unobserved segments, and heterogeneous switching costs in a television viewing choice model. Marketing Sci. 37(2):173–186.Google Scholar
• Siddarth S, Chattopadhyay A (1997) To zap or not to zap: A study of the determinants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Sci. 17(2):124–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Stourm V, Bax E (2013) Charging for ad impact on viewer experience: Marketplace dynamics and Pareto efficiency. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS, Wedel M, Pieters R (2010) Moment-to-moment optimal branding in TV commercials: Preventing avoidance by pulsing. Marketing Sci. 29(5):783–804.Link, Google Scholar
• Television Bureau of Advertising (TVB) (2013) TV basics. Report, Television Bureau of Advertising, New York. http://www.tvb.org/media/file/TV_Basics.pdf.Google Scholar
• Varian H (2007) Position auctions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 25(6):1163–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickrey W (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16(1):8–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb PH, Ray ML (1979) Effects of TV clutter. J. Advertising Res. 19(3):7–12.Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3):356–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2013) Advertising avoidance in live television. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC, Goeree MS, Ridder G (2008) The effects of advertising and product placement on television audiences. Working paper, University of California, San Diego, San Diego. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1151507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woltman Elpers JLCM, Wedel M, Pieters RGM (2003) Why do consumers stop viewing television commercials? Two experiments on the influence of moment-to-moment entertainment and information value. J. Marketing Res. 40(4):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wortman J, Vorobeychik Y, Li L, Langford J (2007) Maintaining equilibria during exploration in sponsored search auctions. Proc. 3rd Workshop Internet Network Econom. (WINE), 119–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zigmond D, Interian Y, Lanning S, Hawkins J, Mirisola R, Rowe S, Volovich Y (2009) When viewers control the schedule: Measuring the impact of digital video recording on TV viewership. Paper presented at the Key Issues Forums at ARF Audience Measurement Conference, June 23, Advertising Research Foundation, New York.Google Scholar