Why, When, and How Much to Entertain Consumers in Advertisements? A Web-Based Facial Tracking Field Study
Published Online:9 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0854
References
- (1981) Viewer perceptions of prime-time television advertising. J. Advertising Res. 21(5):15–23.Google Scholar
- (2008) How commercial ratings changed the $70 B TV market, by Claire Atkinson. Accessed July 2013, http://gaia.adage.com/images/random/0908/Commercial-Ratings%20White%20Paper.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1996) Creativity in Context (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
- (2007) The ad creativity cube: Conceptualization and initial validation. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(2):220–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Persuasive Advertising (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Patterns of affective reactions to advertisements: The integration of MTM responses into overall judgments. J. Marketing Res. 34(2):219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, 7th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- (1979) Humor in children's educational television. Comm. Ed. 28(1):49–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Measuring the value of point-of-purchase marketing with commercial eye-tracking data. Wedel M, Pieters R, eds. Visual Marketing (Lawrence Erlbaum, New York), 225–259.Google Scholar
- CNN Money (2007) The problem with TV ads, by Paul R. La Monica. Accessed May 2012, http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/21/commentary/mediabiz/index.htm.Google Scholar
- (1989) Using drama to persuade. J. Consumer Res. 16(3):335–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Meta-analysis of humor in advertising. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 37(2):191–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) How humor in advertising works: A meta-analytic test of alternative models. Marketing Lett. 22:115–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) The effect of measuring intent on brand-level purchase behavior. J. Consumer Res. 23(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2000) Unobserved heterogeneity as an alternative explanation for “reversal” effects in behavioral research. J. Consumer Res. 27(3):324–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) The influence of classical conditioning procedures on subsequent attention to the conditioned brand. J. Consumer Res. 20(2):171–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Memory factors in advertising: The effect of advertising retrieval cues on brand evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 14(2):316–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Creativity vs. effectiveness? An integrating classification for advertising. J. Advertising Res. 35(6):29–40.Google Scholar
- (1986) The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. J. Marketing Res. 23(2):130–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Crowdsourcing facial responses to online videos. IEEE Trans. Affective Comput. 3(4):456–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Affectiva-MIT facial expression data set (AM-FED): Naturalistic and spontaneous facial expressions collected in-the-wild. Accessed August 2013, http://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/13.McDuff-etal-AMFED.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1981) Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? J. Marketing Res. 18(3):318–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2nd ed. (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (2012) Ad gist: Ad communication in a single eye fixation. Marketing Sci. 31(1):59–73.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Creativity in advertising: When it works and when it doesn't. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(6):106–112.Google Scholar
- (1977) An analysis of information content in television advertising. J. Marketing 41(1):50–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Zooming in on paid search ads: An individual-level model calibrated on aggregated data. Marketing Sci. 30(5):789–800.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Modeling the determinants and effects of creativity in advertising. Marketing Sci. 26(6):819–833.Link, Google Scholar
- (1973) Humor in advertising. J. Marketing 37(3):12–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Moment-to-moment optimal branding in TV commercials: Preventing avoidance by pulsing. Marketing Sci. 29(5):783–804.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Emotion-induced engagement in Internet video ads. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):144–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Optimizing the amount of entertainment in advertising: What's so funny about tracking reactions to humor? J. Advertising Res. 53(3):286–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Advertising and Sales Promotion Strategy (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
- (2004) Effective Advertising (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
- (2003) Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. J. Marketing Res. 40(3):310–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Practitioner and customer views of advertising creativity: Same concept, different meaning? J. Advertising 37(4):35–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Assessing advertising creativity using the creative product semantic scale. J. Advertising Res. 41(6):27–34.Google Scholar
- (2004) Humor in television advertising: A moment-to-moment analysis. J. Consumer Res. 31(3):592–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Why do consumers stop watching TV commercials? Two experiments on the influence of moment-to-moment entertainment and information value. J. Marketing Res. 40(4):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Beyond attention effects: Modeling the persuasive and emotional effects of advertising creativity. Marketing Sci. 28(5):935–949.Link, Google Scholar

