Why Do Salespeople Spend So Much Time Lobbying for Low Prices?
Published Online:8 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0856
References
- (1985) The salesperson as outside agent or employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Sci. 4(3):234–254.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) The Price Advantage (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Controlling innovative projects with moral hazard and adverse selection. Res. Policy 37(9):1504–1514.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Delegation and incentives. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):664–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Delegating pricing decisions. Marketing Sci. 20(2):143–169.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) An empirical analysis of salesforce compensation plans. J. Bus. 65(1):93–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Financial Times Handbook of Management (Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2004) Strategic Negotiation: A Breakthrough Four-Step Process for Effective Business Negotiation (Dearborn Trade Publishing, Chicago).Google Scholar
- (2003) In the eye of the beholder: An analysis of the relative value of a top sales rep across firms and products. Marketing Sci. 22(2):161–187 Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) On the optimality of delegating pricing authority to the sales force. J. Marketing 65(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Salesforce compensation scheme and consumer inferences. Management Sci. 49(5):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Ending the war between sales and marketing. Harvard Business Review reprint, R0607E (Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
- (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Delegating pricing responsibility to the salesforce. Marketing Sci. 5(2):159–168.Link, Google Scholar
- (1986) Salesforce compensation plans in environments with asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. 5(3):179–198.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) On the value of influence activities for capital budgeting. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 65(3–4):625–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Social loss aversion and optimal contest design. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):777–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Relationship organizations and price delegation: An experimental study. Management Sci. 60(3):586–605.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Designing sales contests: Does the prize structure matter? J. Marketing Res. 46(3):356–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Sales force modeling: State of the field and research agenda. Marketing Lett. 21(3):255–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Pricing and Profitability Management: A Practical Guide for Business Leaders (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
- (1992) Organizational prospects, influence costs, and ownership changes. J. Econom. Management Strategy 1(1):9–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Employment contracts, influence activities, and efficient organization design. J. Political Econom. 96(1):42–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Selling in Turbulent Times (Accenture-Economist Intelligence Unit Survey, New York).Google Scholar
- (2004) Centralized pricing versus delegating pricing to the salesforce under information asymmetry. Marketing Sci. 23(1):21–27.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Delegating pricing decisions in competitive markets with symmetric and asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. 24(3):490–497.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) A structural model of sales-force compensation dynamics: Estimation and field implementation. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(3):211–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Quota-based compensation plans for multiterritory heterogeneous salesforces. Management Sci. 42(10):1454–1462.Link, Google Scholar
- (1990) Compensating heterogeneous salesforces: Some explicit solutions. Marketing Sci. 9(4):319–341.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Rethinking Sales Management: A Strategic Guide for Practitioners, Google eBook ed., Feb 15 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2004) Observatoire de la relation marketing-commercial. Special Report by the Center for the Study of Sales and Marketing Relationships. White paper, ADETEM, BT-Syntegra, HEC-Paris, Microsoft and Novamétrie.Google Scholar
- (2005) Sales and marketing integration: A proposed framework. J. Personal Selling Sales Management XXV(2): 113–122.Google Scholar
- (2000) The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. J. Finance 55(6):2537–2564.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Information acquisition and optimal project management. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(4):1032–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Why are bad products so hard to kill? Management Sci. 56(7):1161–1179.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Structuring and managing an effective pricing organization. Özer Ö, Phillips R, eds. Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Six Sigma Pricing: Improving Pricing Operations to Increase Profits (FT Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
- (1975) An optimal commission plan for salesmen's control over prices. Management Sci. 21(April):937–943.Link, Google Scholar
- (1994) On the function of sales assistance. Marketing Sci. 13(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Influence and inefficiency in the internal capital market. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 72(1):305–321.Crossref, Google Scholar

