Learning from Experience, Simply

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0868

References

  • Ackerberg DA (2003) Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: An empirical examination. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(3):1007–1040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banks JS, Sundaram RK (1994) Switching costs and the Gittins index. Econometrica 62(3):687–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Niño-Mora J (2000) Restless bandits, linear programming relaxations, and a primal-dual index heuristic. Oper. Res. 48(1):80–90.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D, Tsitsiklis J (1996) Neuro-Dynamic Programming (Athena Scientific Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bettman JR (1979) An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. 25(3):187–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bröder A (2000) Assessing the empirical validity of the “take the best” heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition 26(5):1332–1346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Kruger MW, Mela CF (2008) The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. 27(4):745–748.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Roundtable Series in Behavioral Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Camerer CF, Ho TH (1999) Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):827–874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Che H, Sudhir K, Seetharaman PB (2007) Bounded rationality in pricing under state-dependent demand: Do firms look ahead, and if so, how far? J. Marketing Res. 44(3):434–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A (2010) A dynamic oligopoly structural model for the prescription drug market after patent expiration. Internat. Econom. Rev. 51(4):1175–1207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A, Erdem T, Keane M (2010) How much do consumers know about the quality of products? Evidence from the diaper market. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A, Erdem T, Keane M (2012) A simple approach to estimate the roles of learning, inventory and experimentation in consumer choice. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  • Ching A, Erdem T, Keane M (2013a) Learning models: An assessment of progress, challenges and new developments. Marketing Sci. 32(6):913–938.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A, Erdem T, Keane M (2013b) Online appendix of “Learning models: An assessment of progress, challenges and new developments.” Marketing Sci. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/mksc.2013.0805.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A, Ishihara M (2010) The effects of detailing on prescribing decisions under quality uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(2):123–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A, Ishihara M (2012) Measuring the informative and persuasive roles of detailing on prescribing decisions. Management Sci. 58(7):1374–1387.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P, Jiang R, Jin GZ (2009) Information, learning, and drug diffusion: The case of Cox-2 inhibitors. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(4):399–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P, Erdem T, Rossi PE, Wedel M (2006) Structural modeling in marketing: Review and assessment. Marketing Sci. 25(6):604–616.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chow C-S, Tsitsiklis JN (1991) An optimal one-way multigrid algorithm for discrete-time stochastic control. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control AC-36(8):898–914.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford GS, Shum M (2005) Uncertainty and learning in pharmaceutical demand. Econometrica 73(4):1137–1173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickstein M (2012) Efficient provision of experience goods: Evidence from antidepressant choice. Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  • Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T, Keane MP, Sun B (2008) A dynamic model of brand choice when price and advertising signal product quality. Marketing Sci. 27(6):1111–1125.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T, Keane MP, Öncü T, Strebel J (2005) Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(3):207–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X, Laibson D (2000) A boundedly rational decision algorithm. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):433–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X, Laibson D, Moloche G, Weinberg S (2006) Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1043–1068.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. 23(3):391–406.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (2002) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittins J (1989) Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gittins J, Jones D (1974) A dynamic allocation index for the sequential design of experiments. Gani J, Sarkadi K, Vince I, eds. Progress in Statistics (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 241–266.Google Scholar
  • Gittins J, Glazebrook K, Weber R (2011) Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glazebrook K, Ruiz-Hernandez D, Kirkbride C (2006) Some indexable families of restless bandit problems. Adv. Appl. Probab. 38(3):643–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G (2002) Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psych. Rev. 109(1):75–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guadagni PM, Little JDC (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen K, Singh V, Chintagunta P (2006) Understanding the store-brand purchase behavior across categories. Marketing Sci. 25(1):75–90.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR (1978) Testing the accuracy, usefulness and significance of probabilistic models: An information theoretic approach. Oper. Res. 26(3):406–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR (1986) Agendas and consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. 23(3):199–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Urban GL (1986) The value priority hypotheses for consumer budget plans. J. Consumer Res. 12(4):446–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Urban GL, Weinberg BD (1993) How consumers allocate their time when searching for information. J. Marketing Res. 30(4):452–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Urban GL, Liberali G, Braun M (2009) Website morphing. Marketing Sci. 28(2):202–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Toubia O, Evgeniou T, Befurt R, Dzyabura D (2010) Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity, and consideration sets. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):485–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho T-H, Chong J-K (2003) A parsimonious model of stockkeeping-unit choice. J. Marketing Res. 40(3):351–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Houser D, Keane MP, McCabe K (2004) Behavior in a dynamic decision problem: An analysis of experimental evidence using Bayesian type classification algorithm. Econometrica 72(3):781–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchinson JMC, Gigerenzer G (2005) Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes 69(2):97–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imai S, Jain N, Ching A (2009) Bayesian estimation of dynamic discrete choice models. Econometrica 77(6):1865–1899.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1985) Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. 31(4):395–414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B (1979) Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(5):972–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamakura W, Russell G (1989) A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. 26(4):379–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keane M, Wolpin K (1994) The solution and estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models by simulation and interpolation: Monte Carlo evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 76(4):648–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R, Jedidi K (2007) Representation and inference of lexicographic preference models and their variants. Marketing Sci. 26(3):380–399.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lindsay PH, Norman DA (1977) Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Marewski JN, Pohl RF, Vitouch O (2010) Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (Vol. 1). Judgment Decision Making 5(4):207–215.Google Scholar
  • Martignon L, Hoffrage U (2002) Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparisons. Theory Decision 52(1):29–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D (1986) The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing Sci. 5(4):275–297.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N, Chen XJ, Narasimhan O (2008) Informing, transforming, and persuading: Disentangling the multiple effects of advertising on brand choice decisions. Marketing Sci. 27(3):334–355.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller R (1984) Job matching and occupational choice. J. Political Econom. 92(6):1086–1120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narasimhan C (1988) Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. 61(4):427–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Manchanda P (2009) Heterogeneous learning and the targeting of marketing communication for new products. Marketing Sci. 28(3):424–441.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK (2005) Temporal differences in the role of marketing communication in new product categories. J. Marketing Res. 42(3):278–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ni J, Neslin SA, Sun B (2012) Database submission—The ISMS durable goods data sets. Marketing Sci. 31(6):1008–1013.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Niño-Mora J (2001) Restless bandit, partial conservation laws and indexability. Adv. Appl. Probab. 33(1):76–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niño-Mora J (2008) A faster index algorithm and a computational study for bandits with switching costs. INFORMS J. Comput. 20(2):255–269.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ny JL, Feron E (2006) Restless bandits with switching costs: Linear programming relaxations, performance bounds and limited lookahead policies. Proc. 2006 Amer. Control Conf., Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  • Papadimitriou CH, Tsitsiklis JN (1999) The complexity of optimal queuing network control. Math. Oper. Res. 24(2):293–305.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1988) Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition 14(3):534–552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts JH, Urban GL (1988) Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. 34(2):167–185.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J (1987) Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica 55(5):999–1033.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J (1994) Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Engle RF, McFadden DF, eds. Handbook of Econometrics (North Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Rust J (1996) Numerical dynamic programming in economics. Amman HM, Kendrick DA, Rust J, eds. Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 1 (North Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Rust J (1997a) Using randomization to break the curse of dimensionality. Econometrica 65(3):487–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J (1997b) Dealing with the complexity of economic calculations. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson PA (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4(2):155–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan SM (1980) The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. 7(2):99–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psych. Rev. 63(2):129–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban GL, Liberali G, MacDonald E, Bordley R, Hauser JR (2014) Morphing banner advertising. Marketing Sci. 33(1):27–46.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vuong QH (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57(2):307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whittle P (1988) Restless bandits: Activity allocation in a changing world. J. Appl. Probab. 25(2):287–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yee M, Dahan E, Hauser JR, Orlin J (2007) Greedoid-based noncompensatory inference. Marketing Sci. 26(4):532–549.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.