The Cross Attributes Flexible Substitution Logit: Uncovering Category Expansion and Share Impacts of Marketing Instruments

References

• Anderson SP, Ciliberto F, Liaukonyte J, Regis R (2012) Push-me pull-you: Comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry. CEPR Discussion Paper. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/cprceprdp/8988.htm.Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, Iyengar S (1997) Going Negative: How Political Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Batra R, Homer PM (2004) The situational impact of brand image beliefs. J. Consumer Psych. 14(3):318–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Chiang J, Padmanabhan V (1999) The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization. Marketing Sci. 18(4):504–526.Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M (1973) The structure of travel demand models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M (1974) Note on the specification of a logit model with utility functions that include attributes of competing alternatives. Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bierlaire M (2006) A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Ann. Oper. Res. 144(1):287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Block H, Marschak J (1960) Random orderings and stochastic theories of response. Olkin I, ed. Contributions to Probability and Statistics (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 97–132.Google Scholar
• Bucklin RE, Gupta S, Siddarth S (1998) Determining segmentation in sales response across consumer purchase behaviors. J. Marketing Res. 35(May):189–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Narasimhan C, Xie Y (2013) Treatment effectiveness and side effects: A model of physician learning. Management Sci. 59(6):1309–1325.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Ishihara M (2012) Measuring the informative and persuasive roles of detailing on prescribing decisions. Management Sci. 58(7):1374–1387.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Erdem T, Keane M (2009) The price consideration model of brand choice. J. Appl. Econometrics 24(3):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Congressional Budget Office (CBO) (2009) Promotional spending for prescription drugs. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Donohue JM, Berndt ER, Rosenthal M, Epstein AM, Frank RG (2004) Effects of pharmaceutical promotion on adherence to the treatment guidelines for depression. Medical Care 42(December):1176–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gönül FF, Carter F, Petrova E, Srinivasan K (2001) Promotion of prescription drugs and its impact on physicians' choice behavior. J. Marketing 65(3):79–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horowitz JL (1991) Reconsidering the multinomial probit model. Transportation Res. Part B 25(6):433–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Just RE, Hueth DL, Schmitz A (2004) The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA).Google Scholar
• Kalwani M, Yim CK, Rinne HJ, Sugita Y (1990) A price expectation model of customer brand choice. J. Marketing Res. 26(August):251–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kok AG, Xu Y (2011) Optimal and competitive assortments with endogenous pricing under hierarchical consumer choice models. Management Sci. 57(9):1546–1563.Link, Google Scholar
• Koppelman FS, Sethi V (2000) Closed-form discrete-choice models. Hensher DA, Button KJ, eds. Handbook of Transport Modeling (Pergamon, Amsterdam), 211–225.Google Scholar
• Kwoka JE (1993) The sales and competitive effects of styling and advertising practices in the U.S. auto industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. 75(4):649–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leeflang PSH, Wittink DR (2001) Explaining competitive reaction effects. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 18(1–2):119–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J (2012) Is comparative advertising an active ingredient in the market for pain relief? Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Gupta S (2011) The impact of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs on physician visits and drug requests: Empirical findings and public policy implications. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 28(3):205–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovett MJ, Shachar R (2011) The seeds of negativity: Knowledge and money. Marketing Sci. 30(3):430–446.Link, Google Scholar
• Marschak J (1960) Binary-choice constraints on random utility indicators. Arrow K, Karlin S, Suppes P, eds. Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 312–329.Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Manski C, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 198–272.Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Desiraju R, Chintagunta PK (2004) Return on investment implications for pharmaceutical promotional expenditures: The role of marketing-mix interactions. J. Marketing 68(4):90–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerlove M, Arrow KJ (1962) Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica 29(May):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijs VR, Dekimpe MG, Steenkamp J-BEM, Hassens DH (2001) The category-demand effects of price promotions. Marketing Sci. 20(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Rajendran KN, Tellis GJ (1994) Contextual and temporal components of reference price. J. Marketing 58(1):22–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM (1996) The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. 15(4):321–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Sahni N (2013) Advertising spillovers: Field-experiment evidence and implications for returns from advertising. Memo, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Steenburgh TJ (2008) The invariant proportion of substitution property (IPS) of discrete-choice models. Marketing Sci. 27(2):300–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BEM, Nijs VR, Hassens DM, Dekimpe MG (2005) Competitive reactions to advertising and promotion attacks. Marketing Sci. 24(1):35–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Wansink B (1994) Advertising’s impact on category substitution. J. Marketing Res. 31(November):505–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wen C-H, Koppelman FS (2001) The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Res. Part B 35(7):627–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winer RS (1986) A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. 13(September):250–256.Crossref, Google Scholar