Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms

References

• Altinkemer K, Tomak K (2001) A distributed allocation mechanism for network resources using software agents. Inform. Tech. Management 2:165–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman J, Chu K (2001) How to charge for network services—Flat-rate or use-based. Computer Networks 36:519–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow JI (1982) Durable-goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. 90:314–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlozo L (2012) How does Walmart’s VUDU movie streaming service stack up? dealnews.com (August 3). Accessed January 21, 2015, http://dealnews.com/features/How-Does-Walmarts-VUDU-Movie-Streaming-Service-Stack-Up/598146.html.Google Scholar
• Chavez C (2011) T-Mobile adding new pay-per-use data to all smartphone accounts without a data plan. Phandroid Newsletter (August 25):1–2. http://phandroid.com/2011/08/25/t-mobile-adding-new-pay-per-use-data-plan-to-all-smartphone-accounts-without-a-data-plan/.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Narasimhan C, Zhang ZJ (2001) Consumer heterogeneity and competitive price-matching guarantees. Marketing Sci. 20(3):300–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Demirkan H, Koehler GJ (2003) Price and capacity competition of application services duopoly. Inform. Systems E-Business Management 1:305–329.Google Scholar
• Choudhary V, Tomak K, Chaturvedi A (1998) Economic benefits of renting software. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce 8(4):277–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chuang JCI, Sirbu MA (1997) Network delivery of information goods: Optimal pricing of articles and subscriptions. Hurley D, Kahin B, Varian H, eds. Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 138–166.Google Scholar
• Clark J (2011) Hitachi data systems gets into rentable clouds. ZDNET UK Newsletter (October 25). http://www.zdnet.com/article/hitachi-data-systems-gets-into-rentable-clouds/.Google Scholar
• Cooper R, DeJong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1989) Communication in the battle of the sexes game: Some experimental results. RAND J. Econom. 20(4):568–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coughlan AT (1985) Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. 4(2): 110–129.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1999) Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. 18(1):42–58.Link, Google Scholar
• Dixit A, Shapiro C (1986) Entry dynamics with mixed strategies. Thomas LG, ed. The Economics of Strategic Planning (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), 63–79.Google Scholar
• Essegaier S, Gupta S, Zhang ZJ (2002) Pricing access services. Marketing Sci. 21(2):139–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Farrell J (1987) Cheap talk, coordination and entry. RAND J. Econom. 18(1):34–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fay S (2009) Competitive reasons for the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Lett. 20(3):277–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC, Odlyzko AM (1999) Competitive pricing of information goods: Subscription pricing versus pay-per-use. Econom. Theory 13(2):447–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flint J (2012) FCC Chairman Genachowski on board with usage pricing for broadband. Los Angeles Times (May 22). http://articles.latimes.com/2012/may/22/entertainment/la-et-ct-fcc-20120522.Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Loulou R (1998) Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: Strategic incentives in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 17(4):301–316.Link, Google Scholar
• Hamburger E, Lincoln K (2012) If you love movies, you shouldn’t be using Netflix. Bus. Insider (February 3). http://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-alternatives-2012-2?IR=T&op=1.Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Shugan SM (1983) Defensive marketing strategies. Marketing Sci. 2(4):319–360.Link, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Hoskisson RE (2012) Strategic Management Cases: Competitiveness and Globalization (Southwestern Cengage Learning Publishers, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Jain S, Kannan P (2002) Pricing of information products on online servers: Issues, models and analysis. Management Sci. 48(9):1123–1142.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Chen PY, Mukhopadhyay T (2007) Software licensing: Pay-per-use versus perpetual. Working paper, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Krishnan TV, Bass FM, Jain DC (1999) Optimal pricing strategy for new products. Management Sci. 45(12):1650–1663.Link, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Skiera B (2006) Paying too much and being happy about it: Existence, causes, and consequences of tariff-choice biases. J. Marketing Res. XLIII:212–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D, Peck J (2003) To grab for the market or to bide one’s time: A dynamic model of entry. RAND J. Econom. 34(3):536–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin Y, McGill J, Nediak M (2009) Dynamic pricing in the presence of strategic consumers and oligopolistic competition. Management Sci. 55(1):32–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Machine Design (2000) Renting CAD over the Internet. Machine Design 72:70–73.Google Scholar
• Machrone B (2006) What’s in your wallet? PC Magazine (June 6): 68–69.Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1988) Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 7(2):141–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Nicolle L (2002) At your service. Enterprise (April/May):17–18.Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1998) The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Sci. 17(1):4–28.Link, Google Scholar
• radius180 (2013) Cloud computing. Accessed July 9, 2013, http://www.radius180.com/it-solutions/cloud-computing.aspx.Google Scholar
• Reeve R (2011) Enhance your productivity via the Web. PC World (October 31):1–2.Google Scholar
• Shaffer G, Zhang ZJ (1995) Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. 14(4):395–416.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaffer S (2004) Licensing requirements as a coordination mechanism for entry. Rev. Indust. Organ. 24:285–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. XLIX:3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shulman JD, Coughlan AT (2007) Used goods, not used bads: Profitable secondary market sales for a durable goods channel. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(2):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soman D (2001) Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. J. Consumer Res. 27:460–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stadil S (2013) By the numbers: How Google compute engine stacks up to Amazon EC2 (March 15). Accessed January 21, 2015, www.gigaom.com.Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Sci. 50(12):1660–1673.Link, Google Scholar
• Train K (1991) Optimal Regulation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Train K, McFadden DL, Ben-Akiva M (1987) The demand for local telephone service: A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices. RAND J. Econom. 18(1):109–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2000) Buying, sharing and renting information goods. J. Indust. Econom. XLVIII(4):473–488.Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Seidmann A (2010) Selling or subscribing software under quality uncertainty and network externality effect. Sprague RH Jr., ed. Proc. 43rd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sciences (HICSS) (IEEE, Honolulu), 1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar