Online Content Pricing: Purchase and Rental Markets
Published Online:19 Mar 2015https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0896
References
- (1972) Monopoly and contrived depreciation. J. Political Econom. 80(3):598–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Durable goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. 90(2):314–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Intertemporal movie distribution: Versioning when customers can buy both versions. Marketing Sci. 31(4):649–667.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) When do secondary markets harm firms? Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2911–2934.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1972) Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. 15(1):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1974) Rational expectations and bayesian analysis. J. Political Econom. 82(3):521–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) To lease or to buy? A structural model of a consumer’s vehicle and contract choice decisions. J. Marketing Res. 44(3):490–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. 44(11, Part 2):S19–S34.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. 18(1):42–58.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) An incentive-aligned mechanism for conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 44(2):214–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):67–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Improving the numerical performance of BLP static and dynamic discrete choice random coefficients demand estimation. Econometrica 80(5):2231–2267.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) The joint identification of utility and discount functions from stated choice data: An application to durable goods adoption. Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(4):331–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. 22(3):329–354.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. 23(3):391–406.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Does AMD spur Intel to innovate more? J. Political Econom. 119(6):1141–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Dynamics of consumer demand for new durable goods. J. Political Econom. 120(6):1173–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1971) Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. J. Marketing Res. 8(3):355–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J. Consumer Res. 5(2):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing 54(4):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of Japanese video games. Working paper 2189871, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
- (2008) A conjoint approach to multipart pricing. J. Marketing Res. 45(2):195–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The consumer’s rent vs. buy decision in the retailer. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 26(2):125–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Intertemporal price discrimination in frictionless durable goods monopolies. J. Indust. Econom. 46(1):101–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Optimal inter-release time between sequentially released products. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
- (1977) The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica 45(8):1977–1988.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Price discrimination, copyright law, and technological innovation: Evidence from the introduction of DVDs. Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1307–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Modeling multichannel home video demand in the U.S. motion picture industry. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):985–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(3):239–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Beyond conjoint analysis: advances in preference measurement. Marketing Lett. 19(3–4):337–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research (Research Publishers, LLC, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
- Purohit (1995) Marketing channels and the durable goods monopolist: Renting versus selling reconsidered. J. Econom. Management Strategy 4(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) A parsimonious model for forecasting gross box-office revenues of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. 15(2):113–131.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Disentangling preferences and learning in brand choice models. Marketing Sci. 31(1):115–137.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(4):371–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Intertemporal price discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. 93(3):355–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Rational expectations and durable goods pricing. Bell J. Econom. 12(1):112–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Constrained optimization approaches to estimation of structural models. Econometrica 80(5):2213–2230.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Buying, sharing and renting information goods. J. Indust. Econom. 48(4):473–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Durable goods theory for real world markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar

