Product and Pricing Decisions in Crowdfunding

References

• Agrawal AK, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2011) The geography of crowdfunding. NBER Working paper 16820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal AK, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2014) Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy Econom. 14(1):63–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand K, Aron R (2003) Group buying on the Web: A comparison of price-discovery mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(11): 1546–1562.Link, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Lipman B (1989) Provision of public goods: Fully implementing the core through private contributions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 56(4):583–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balachander S, Srinivasan K (1994) Selection of product line qualities and prices to signal competitive advantage. Management Sci. 40(7):824–841.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li X (2013) Group buying commitment and fundraisers' competitive advantages. J. Econ. Management Strat. 22(1): 164–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Koenigsberg O, Zhang ZJ (2012) Pay-as-you-wish pricing. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Cortese A (2013) The crowdfunding crowd is anxious. New York Times (January 6), B1. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/business/crowdfunding-for-small-business-is-still-an-unclear-path.html.Google Scholar
• Desai P (2001) Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design. Marketing Sci. 20(3):265–283.Link, Google Scholar
• Freedman SM, Jin GZ (2011) Learning by doing with asymmetric information: Evidence from Prosper.com. NBER Working Paper 16855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstner E, Hess J, Chu W (1993) Demarketing as a differentiation strategy. Marketing Lett. 4(1):49–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Nelson LD, Brown A (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989):325–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Zhang J (2012) Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Sci. 31(6):995–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Harbaugh WT (1998) What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. J. Publ. Econom 67(2):269–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Shi M, Wu J (2013) Simultaneous vs. sequential group-buying mechanisms. Management Sci. 59(12):2805–2822.Link, Google Scholar
• Jing B (2007) Network externalities and market segmentation in a monopoly. Econom Lett. 95(1):7–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jing X, Xie J (2011) Group buying: A new mechanism for selling through social interactions. Management Sci. 57(8):1354–1372.Link, Google Scholar
• Kauffman RJ, Wang B (2001) New buyers' arrival under dynamic pricing market microstructure: The case of group-buying discounts on the Internet. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(2): 157–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Natter M, Spann M (2009) Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. J. Marketing 73(1):44–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miklos-Thal J, Zhang J (2013) (De)marketing to manage backer quality inferences. J. Marketing Res. 50(1):55–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monahan JP (1984) A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits. Management Sci. 30(6):720–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy S (1984) Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci. 3(4):288–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Pazgal A, Soberman D, Thomadsen R (2013) Profit-increasing backer exit. Marketing Sci. 32(6):998–1008.Link, Google Scholar
• Subramanian U, Rao RC (2014) An equilibrium analysis of daily deal strategies: When should a daily deal website display deal sales? Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas.Google Scholar
• Syam NB, Ruan R, Hess JD (2005) Customized products: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. 24(4):569–584.Link, Google Scholar
• Valenzuela A, Dhar R, Zettelmeyer F (2009) Contingent response to self-customization procedures: Implications for decision satisfaction and choice. J. Marketing Res. 46(6):754–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1994) Sequential contributions to public goods. J. Publ. Econom 53(2):165–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (1998) Product line design for a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 17(2):156–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Wortham J (2013) Law opens financing of start-ups to crowds. New York Times (September 23), B1. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/23/technology/lawopens-financing-of-start-ups-to-crowds.html.Google Scholar
• Wu J, Shi M, Hu M (2014) Threshold effects in online group buying. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print December 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2015.Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar