The “Peter Pan Syndrome” in Emerging Markets: The Productivity-Transparency Trade-off in IT Adoption

References

• Abadie A, Drukker D, Herr JL, Imbens GW (2004) Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. Stata J. 4(3):290–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amin M (2010) Computer usage and labor regulations in India’s retail sector. J. Development Stud. 46(9):1572–1592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angelini P, Generale A (2008) On the evolution of firm size distributions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):426–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azuma Y, Grossman H (2008) A theory of the informal sector. Econom. Politics 20(1):62–79.Google Scholar
• Bartel A, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2005) How does information technology really affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement and worker skills. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1721–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technology and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 6(1):3–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Basu S, Fernald JG, Oulton N, Srinivasan S (2003) The case of the missing productivity growth: Or, does information technology explain why productivity accelerated in the United States but not in the United Kingdom? Working Paper Series WP-03-08, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Becker SO, Ichino A (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata J. 2(4):358–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bird RM, Zolt EM (2008) Technology and taxation in developing countries: From hand to mouse. National Tax J. LXI(4, Part 2): 791–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black S, Lynch L (2001) How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 83(3):434–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brand JE, Xie Y (2010) Who benefits most from college? Evidence for negative selection in heterogeneous economic returns to higher education. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(2):273–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Chopra A (2011) India’s push to tame tax evasion. National (June 18). Accessed July 20, 2012, http://www.thenational.ae/business/industry-insights/economics/indias-push-to-tame-tax-evasion.Google Scholar
• Commander S, Harrison R, Menezes-Filho N (2011) ICT and productivity in developing countries: New firm-level evidence from Brazil and India. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(2):528–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cull R, Xu LC (2005) Institutions, ownership, and finance: The determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms. J. Financial Econom. 77(1):117–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dabla-Norris E, Gradstein M, Inchauste G (2008) What causes firms to hide output? The determinants of informality. J. Development Econom. 85(1/2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S, Sarkis J, Talluri S (1999) Influence of information technology investment on firm productivity: A cross-sectional study. Logist. Inform. Management 12(1/2):120–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone WH (1981) Firm size and characteristics of computer use. MIS Quart. 5(4):65–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewett T, Jones GR (2001) The role of information technology in the organization: A review, model, and assessment. J. Management 27(3):313–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhara T, Thomas C (2011) In India, tax evasion is a national sport. Bloomberg Businessweek (July 28). Accessed July 20, 2012, http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/magazine/in-india-tax-evasion-is-a-national-sport-07282011.html.Google Scholar
• DiPrete T, Gangl M (2004) Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociol. Methodology 34(1):271–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabiani S, Schivardi F, Trento S (2005) ICT adoption in Italian manufacturing: Firm-level evidence. Indust. Corporate Change 14(2):225–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell D (2004) Boost growth by reducing the informal economy. Asian Wall Street J. (October 18). Accessed April 24, 2012, http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/in_the_news/boost_growth_by_reducing_the_informal_economy.Google Scholar
• Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Krizan CJ (2002) The link between aggregate and micro productivity growth: Evidence from retail trade. NBER Working Paper 9120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman E, Johnson S, Kaufman D, Zoido-Lobaton P (2000) Dodging the grabbing hand: The determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. J. Public Econom. 76(3):459–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatti R, Honoratti M (2008) Informality among formal firms: Firm-level, cross-country evidence on tax compliance and access to credit. Policy Research Working Paper 4476, World Bank, Washington, DC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Government of India (2011) India Human Development Report 2011: Towards Social Inclusion. Planning Commission (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Harris SE, Katz JL (1991) Firm size and the information technology investment intensity of life insurers. MIS Quart. 15(3):333–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev. Econom. Stud. 64(4):605–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd P (1998a) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev. Econom. Stud. 65(2):261–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J, Ichimura H, Smith J, Todd P (1998b) Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica 66(5):1017–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
• International Tax Compact (2010) Avoiding tax evasion and tax avoidance in developing countries. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ, Eschborn, Germany).Google Scholar
• Johnson S, Kaufman D, McMillan J, Woodruff C (2000) What do firms hide? Bribes and unofficial activity after communism. J. Public Econom. 76(3):495–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorgenson D (2001) Information technology and the US economy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefebvre LA, Lefebvre É, Elia E, Boeck H (2005) Exploring B-to-B e-commerce adoption trajectories in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation 25(12):1443–1456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuven E, Sianesi B (2003) PSMATCH2—Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Software. Accessed June 14, 2012, http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.Google Scholar
• Love PE, Irani Z, Standing C, Lin C, Burn JM (2005) The enigma of evaluation: Benefits, costs and risks of IT in Australian small–medium-sized enterprises. Inform. Management 42(7):947–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loveman GW (1994) An assessment of the productivity impact on information technologies. Allen TJ, Scott Morton MS, eds. Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 84–110.Google Scholar
• Maddala GS (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcouiller D, Young LL (1995) The black hole of graft: The predatory state and the informal economy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(3):630–646.Google Scholar
• Mesfin M (2012) Ethiopia: Tax authority unhappy with lack of cash register servicing. Addis Fortune (March 4). Accessed August 3, 2012, http://allafrica.com/stories/201203060697.html.Google Scholar
• Miller AR, Tucker CE (2014) Electronic discovery and the adoption of information technology. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 30(2): 217–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra P, Subramanian A, Topalova P (2008) Tariffs, enforcement, and customs evasion: Evidence from India. J. Public Econom. 92(10–11):1907–1925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan A, Colebourne D, Thomas B (2006) The development of ICT advisors for SME businesses: An innovative approach. Technovation 26(8):980–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison CJ, Berndt ER (1990) Assessing the productivity of information technology equipment in the U.S. manufacturing industries. NBER Working Paper 3582.Google Scholar
• Nayar K (2011) Laundering black money. Deccan Herald (February 4). Accessed August 17, 2013, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/134580/laundering-black-money.html.Google Scholar
• People’s Daily (2000) China battles tax evasion with help of computers. (December 4). Accessed August 17, 2013, http://english.peopledaily.com.cn.Google Scholar
• Rao VV (2010) Black, bold and bountiful. Hindu Bus. Line (August 13). Accessed July 15, 2013, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/black-bold-and-bountiful/article1001195.ece.Google Scholar
• Reardon T, Gulati A (2008) The supermarket revolution in developing countries. Internat. Food Policy Res. Institute (IFPRI), Policy Brief 2, June. Accessed July 11, 2012, http://www.ifpri.org/publication/supermarket-revolution-developing-countries.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell B (2010) Revenue administration: Managing the shadow economy. Technical Notes and Manuals 10/14, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Schneider F, Enste D (2002) Shadow economies: Size, causes and consequences. J. Econom. Literature 38(1):77–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha B (2003) Pan masala unit raided for Rs. 6-cr sales tax evasion. Times India (October 23). Accessed September 23, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/.Google Scholar
• Smith MG (2013) Doing it under the table: Unreported sales in India’s manufacturing sector. Working paper, U.S. Department of Treasury, Washington, DC, http://ssrn.com/abstract=220822.Google Scholar
• Stiroh K (2002) Information technology and the US productivity revival: What do the industry data say? Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1559–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiroh K (2010) Reassessing the role of IT in the production function: A meta-analysis. NBER Working Paper 12245.Google Scholar
• Sunder S (2012) India’s retarded retail sector. Live Mint (January 8). Accessed February 11, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/v68no3uwkCrdJgdS9OPxrI/India8217s-retarded-retail-sector.html.Google Scholar
• The Daily Star (2007) Electronic cash registers to be made mandatory (December 17). Accessed September 23, 2013, http://archive.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=15744.Google Scholar
• Thong J (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J. Management Inform. Systems 15(4):187–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Transparency International (2012) Corruption Perceptions Index 2012. Accessed June 2, 2012, http://www.transparency.org/poli/cpi/.Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Brand JE, Jann B (2011) Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with observational data. Research Report II-729 (February) (Population Studies Center, Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar