Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where

References

• Abhishek V, Fader PS, Hosanagar K (2013) Media exposure through the funnel: A model of multi-stage attribution. Working paper, Heinz College, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Anand BN, Shachar R (2009) Targeted advertising as a signal. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(3):237–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari A, Mela CF (2003) E-customization. J. Marketing Res. 40(2): 131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker BJ, Fang Z, Luo X (2014) Hour-by-hour sales impact of mobile advertising. Working paper, Fox School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. 25(3):187–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar A, Papatla P (2001) Identifying locations for targeted advertising on the Internet. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 5(3): 23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun M, Moe W (2013) Online display advertising: Modeling the effects of multiple creatives and individual impression histories. Marketing Sci. 32(5):753–767.Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell MC (1995) When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. J. Consumer Psych. 4(3):225–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee P (2005) Changing banner ad executions on the Web: Impact on clickthroughs and communications outcomes. Adv. Consumer Res. 32(1):51–57.Google Scholar
• Chatterjee P, Hoffman DL, Novak TP (2003) Modeling the clickstream: Implications for web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Sci. 22(4):520–541.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho C-H, Cheon HJ (2004) Why do people avoid advertising on the Internet? J. Advertising 33(4):89–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Close AG, Kukar-Kinney M (2010) Beyond buying: Motivations behind consumers’ online shopping cart use. J. Bus. Res. 63(9): 986–992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalessandro B, Hook R, Perlich C, Provost F (2012) Evaluating and optimizing online advertising: Forget the click, but there are good proxies. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Drèze X, Hussherr F-X (2003) Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? J. Interactive Marketing 17(4):8–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards SM, Li H, Lee J-H (2002) Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. J. Advertising 31(3):83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2013) Social, digital video drive further growth in time spent online. (May 8). Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Social-Digital-Video-Drive-Further-Growth-Time-Spent-Online/Article/1009872.Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2011a) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2011b) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Google (2015) Attribution reports and conversion data. Accessed June 23, 2015, https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/1722023?hl=en.Google Scholar
• Guadagni PM, Little JDC (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Guadagni PM, Little JDC (1998) When and what to buy: A nested logit model of coffee purchase. J. Forecasting 17(3/4):303–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha L, McCann K (2008) An integrated model of advertising clutter in offline and online media. Internat. J. Advertising 27(4): 569–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamman D, Plomion B (2013) Chango retargeting barometer. Report, Chango, Toronto. Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.iab.net/media/file/Chango_Retargeting_Barometer_April_2013.pdf.Google Scholar
• Helft M, Vega T (2010) Retargeting ads follow surfers to other sites. New York Times (August 29). Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/30/technology/30adstalk.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Hoeffler S, Ariely D (1999) Constructing stable preferences: A look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. J. Consumer Psych. 8(2):113–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hof R (2011) Can behavioral targeting survive privacy worries? Forbes (July 20). Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthof/2011/07/20/can-behavioral-targeting-survive-privacy-worries.Google Scholar
• Hoffman DL, Novak TP (1996) Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. J. Marketing 60(3):50–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard J, Sheth JN (1969) A Theory of Buyer Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Interactive Advertising Bureau (2013) First quarter 2013 Internet ad revenues set new high, at $9.6 billion. Press release (June 3). Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.iab.net/about_the_iab/ecent_press_releases/press_release_archive/press_release/pr-060313.Google Scholar
• Jensen JD, King A, Carcioppolo N, Davis L (2012) Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention. J. Comm. 62(5):851–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones JM, Landwehr JT (1988) Removing heterogeneity bias from logit model estimation. Marketing Sci. 7(1):41–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kazienko P, Adamski M (2007) AdROSA—Adaptive personalization of Web advertising. Inform. Sci. 177(11):2269–2295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2013) When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. J. Marketing Res. 50(5):561–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee L, Ariely D (2006) Shopping goals, goal concreteness, and conditional promotions. J. Consumer Res. 33(1):60–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenert L, Muñoz RF, Perez JE, Bansod A (2004) Automated e-mail messaging as a tool for improving quit rates in an Internet smoking cessation intervention. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 11(4):235–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2014) Online ads and offline sales: Measuring the effects of retail advertising via a controlled experiment on Yahoo. Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(3):235–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Kannan PK (2014) Attributing conversions in a multichannel online marketing environment: An empirical model and a field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 51(1):40–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Edwards SM, Lee J-H (2002) Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and validation. J. Advertising 31(2):37–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li S, Chatterjee P (2005) Shopping cart abandonment at retail websites—A multi-stage model of online shopping behavior. Paper presented at the 2005 Marketing Science Conference, Emory University, Atlanta, June 16–18.Google Scholar
• Lipsman A, Aquino C, Flosi S (2013) 2013 U.S. digital future in focus. Report, ComScore, Reston, VA. Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations-and-Whitepapers/2013/2013-US-Digital-Future-in-Focus.Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Dubé J-P, Goh KY, Chintagunta PK (2006) The effect of banner advertising on Internet purchasing. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):98–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MediaMind (2012) Global benchmarks report—H1 2012. Report, MediaMind, New York. Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.iab.net/media/file/MediaMind_Benchmark_H1_2012.pdf.Google Scholar
• Moore RS, Stammerjohan CA, Coulter RA (2005) Banner advertiser-Web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. J. Advertising 34(2):71–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris B (2013) More consumers prefer online shopping. Wall Street Journal (June 3). Accessed June 23, 2015, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324063304578523112193480212.html.Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlich C, Dalessandro B, Raeder T, Stitelman O, Provost F (2014) Machine learning for targeted display advertising: Transfer learning in action. Machine Learn. 95(1):103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlich C, Dalessandro B, Hook R, Stitelman O, Raeder T, Provost F (2012) Bid optimizing and inventory scoring in targeted online advertising. Proc. 18th Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (SIGKDD) (ACM, New York), 804–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson T (2013) eBay opens up its data for ad targeting—Follows lead of Amazon, Google and Facebook. Adweek (April 8). Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/ebay-opens-its-data-ad-targeting-148469.Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Schumann D (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J. Consumer Res. 10(2):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (2011) Measuring the effectiveness of online advertising. Report, PricewaterhouseCoopers, London, Accessed June 23, 2015, http://download.pwc.com/ie/pubs/2011_measuring_the_effectiveness_of_online_advertising.pdf.Google Scholar
• Provost F, Dalessandro B, Hook R, Zhang X, Murray A (2009) Audience selection for on-line brand advertising: Privacy-friendly social network targeting. Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (SIGKDD) (ACM, New York),707–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raeder T, Stitelman O, Dalessandro B, Perlich C, Provost F (2012) Design principles of massive, robust prediction systems. Proc. 18th Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (SIGKDD) (ACM, New York), 1357–1365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodgers S, Thorson E (2000) The interactive advertising model: How users perceive and process online ads. J. Interactive Advertising 1(1):42–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider W, Shiffrin RM (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psych. Rev. 84(1):1–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengupta S (2013) What you didn’t post, Facebook may still know. New York Times (March 25). Accessed June 23, 2015, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/26/technology/facebook-expands-targeted-advertising-through-outside-data-sources.html?pagewanted=all.Google Scholar
• Shamdasani PN, Stanaland AJS, Tan J (2001) Location location location: Insights for advertising placement on the Web. J. Advertising Res. 41(4):7–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I (2005) Determinants of customers’ responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions. J. Marketing 69(1):32–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I, Winer RS (1992) The influence of purchase quantity and display format on consumer preference for variety. J. Consumer Res. 19(1):133–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, Curry S, Prochaska JO (1999) How effective is tailored print communication? Ann. Behavioral Medicine 21(4):290–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stitelman O, Dalessandro B, Perlich C, Provost F (2011) Estimating the effect of online display advertising on browser conversion. Proc. 5th Internat. Workshop Data Mining Audience Intelligence Advertising (ADKDD) (ACM, New York), 8–16.Google Scholar
• Tucker CE (2014) Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Marketing Res. 51(5):546–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban GL, Liberali G, MacDonald E, Bordley R, Hauser JR (2014) Morphing banner advertising. Marketing Sci. 33(1):27–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Doorn J, Hoekstra JC (2013) Customization of online advertising: The role of intrusiveness. Marketing Lett. 24(4):339–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhoef PC, Neslin SA, Vroomen B (2007) Multichannel customer management: Understanding the research-shopper phenomenon. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 24(2):129–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White TB, Zahay DL, Thorbjørnsen H, Shavitt S (2008) Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Lett. 19(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaveroglu I, Donthu N (2008) Advertising repetition and placement issues in on-line environments. J. Advertising 37(2):31–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo B, Donthu N (2001) Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an Internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Quart. J. Electronic Commerce 2(1):31–45.Google Scholar
• Yoon SO, Simonson I (2008) Choice set configuration as a determinant of preference attribution and strength. J. Consumer Res. 35(2):324–336.Crossref, Google Scholar