Consumer Preference Elicitation of Complex Products Using Fuzzy Support Vector Machine Active Learning

References

• Abernethy J, Evgeniou T, Toubia O, Vert JP (2008) Eliciting consumer preferences using robust adaptive choice questionnaires. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 20(2):145–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman J (1979) An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Breese JS, Heckerman D, Kadie C (1998) Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. Proc. 14th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence, 43–52.Google Scholar
• Chaloner K, Verdinelli I (1995) Bayesian experimental design: A review. Statist. Sci. 10(3):273–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Machine Learn. 20(3):273–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui D, Curry D (2005) Prediction in marketing using the support vector machine. Marketing Sci. 24(4):595–615.Link, Google Scholar
• Ding M (2007) An incentive-aligned mechanism for conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 44(2):214–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Grewal R, Liechty J (2005) Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):67–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Park YH, Bradlow ET (2009) Barter markets for conjoint analysis. Management Sci. 55(6):1003–1017.Link, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Hauser JR, Dong S, Dzyabura D, Yang Z, Su C, Gaskin SP (2011) Unstructured direct elicitation of decision rules. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):116–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong JX, Krzyzak A, Suen CY (2005) Fast SVM training algorithm with decomposition on very large data sets. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 27(4):603–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong S, Ding M, Huber J (2010) A simple mechanism to incentive-align conjoint experiments. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 27(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dzyabura D, Hauser JR (2011) Active machine learning for consideration heuristics. Marketing Sci. 30(5):801–819.Link, Google Scholar
• Evgeniou T, Boussios C, Zacharia G (2005) Generalized robust conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. 24(3):415–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Evgeniou T, Pontil M, Toubia O (2007) A convex optimization approach to modeling consumer heterogeneity in conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. 26(6):805–818.Link, Google Scholar
• Green PE, Srinivasan VS (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing 54(4):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haaijer R, Kamakura WA, Wedel M (2001) The no-choice alternative in conjoint choice experiments. Internat. J. Market Res. 43(1):93–106.Google Scholar
• Hauser JR (1978) Testing the accuracy, usefulness, and significance of probabilistic choice models: An information-theoretic approach. Oper. Res. 26(3):406–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Rao VR (2004) Conjoint analysis, related modeling, and applications. Wind Y, Green PE, eds. Marketing Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects (Springer, New York), 141–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Toubia O (2005) The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. 24(3):498–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Dong S, Ding M (2014) Self-reflection and articulated consumer preferences. J. Product Innovation Management 31(1):17–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Toubia O, Evgeniou T, Befurt R, Dzyabura D (2010) Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity, and consideration sets. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):485–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heo G, Gader P (2009) Fuzzy SVM for noisy data: A robust membership calculation method. 2009 Fuzzy Systems Conf. Proc., 431–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herbrich R, Graepel T, Campbell C (2001) Bayes point machines. J. Machine Learn. Res. 1(September):245–279.Google Scholar
• Hoi SC, Jin R, Zhu J, Lyu MR (2009) Semisupervised SVM batch mode active learning with applications to image retrieval. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 27(3):Article 16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J, Hansen D (1986) Testing the impact of dimensional complexity and affective differences in adaptive conjoint analysis. Adv. Consumer Res. 14(1):159–163.Google Scholar
• Huber J, Wittink DR, Fiedler JA, Miller R (1993) The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation procedures in predicting choice. J. Marketing Res. 30(1):105–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RM, Orme BK (2007) A new approach to adaptive CBC. Sawtooth Software Research Paper, Sequim, WA.Google Scholar
• Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22(1):79–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leng Y, Xu X, Qi G (2013) Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning to construct SVM classifier. Knowledge-Based Systems 44(May):121–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin CF, Wang SD (2002) Fuzzy support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 13(2):464–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin CF, Wang SD (2004) Training algorithms for fuzzy support vector machines with noisy data. Pattern Recognition Lett. 25(14):1647–1656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netzer O, Srinivasan VS (2011) Adaptive self-explication of multiattribute preferences. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):140–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orme B (2007) Three ways to treat overall price in conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Software Research Paper, Sequim, WA.Google Scholar
• Orme B (2010) Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research, 2nd ed. (Research Publishers LLC, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
• Park YH, Ding M, Rao VR (2008) Eliciting preference for complex products: A web-based upgrading method. J. Marketing Res. 45(5):562–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patra S, Bruzzone L (2012) A batch-mode active learning technique based on multiple uncertainty for SVM classifier. Geoscience Remote Sensing Lett. 9(3):497–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salton G, McGill MJ (1986) Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Sattler H, Hensel-Börner S (2000) A comparison of conjoint measurement with self-explicated approaches. Gustafsson A, Huber F, eds. Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 147–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholz SW, Meissner M, Decker R (2010) Measuring consumer preferences for complex products: A compositional approach based on paired comparisons. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):685–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shilton A, Lai DT (2007) Iterative fuzzy support vector machine classification. 2007 Fuzzy Systems Conf. Proc., 1391–1396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan VS (1988) A conjunctive-compensatory approach to the self-explication of multiattributed preferences. Decision Sci. 19(2):295–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tong S, Koller D (2001) Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J. Machine Learn. Res. 2(March):45–66.Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Evgeniou T, Hauser JR (2007a) Optimization-based and machine-learning methods for conjoint analysis: Estimation and question design. Gustafsson A, Herrmann A, eds. Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications, 4th ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 231–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Hauser JR, Garcia R (2007b) Probabilistic polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. 26(5):596–610.Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Hauser JR, Simester DI (2004) Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 41(1):116–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Johnson E, Evgeniou T, Delquié P (2013) Dynamic experiments for estimating preferences: An adaptive method of eliciting time and risk parameters. Management Sci. 59(3):613–640.Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Simester DI, Hauser JR, Dahan E (2003) Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. 22(3):273–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN (1998) Statistical Learning Theory (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang S, Lai KK (2005) A fuzzy support vector machine to evaluate credit risk. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Sys. 13(6):820–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu K, Yap KH (2006) Fuzzy SVM for content-based image retrieval. IEEE Comput. Intelligence Magazine 1(2):10–16.Crossref, Google Scholar