Quantifying Cross and Direct Network Effects in Online Consumer-to-Consumer Platforms

References

• Ackerberg DA, Gowrisankaran G (2006) Quantifying equilibrium network externalities in the ACH banking industry. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):738–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argentesi E, Filistrucchi L (2007) Estimating market power in a two-sided market: The case of newspapers. J. Appl. Econometrics 22(7):1247–1266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Bean JC, Noon CE, Ryan SM, Salton GJ (1988) Selecting tenants in a shopping mall. Interfaces 18(2):1–9.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boatwright P, Nunes JC (2001) Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. J. Marketing 65(3):50–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briesch RA, Chintagunta PK, Fox EJ (2009) How does assortment affect grocery store choice? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):176–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandra A, Collard-Wexler A (2009) Mergers in two-sided markets: An application to the Canadian newspaper industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1045–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie J (2007) Cross-market network effect with asymmetric customer loyalty: Implications for competitive advantage. Marketing Sci. 26(1):52–66.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu J (2013) Quantifying nation equity with sales data: A structural approach. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 30(1):19–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu J, Chintagunta PK (2009) Quantifying the economic value of warranties in the U.S. server market. Marketing Sci. 28(1):99–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu J, Chintagunta PK, Vilcassim NJ (2007) Assessing the economic value of distribution channels: An application to the personal computer industry. J. Marketing Res. 44(1):29–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clements MT, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the U.S., 1994–2002. J. Indust. Econom. 53(4):515–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-PH, Hitsch GJ, Chintagunta PK (2010) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Fan Y (2013) Ownership consolidation and product characteristics: A study of the U.S. daily newspaper market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(5):1598–1628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandal N, Kende M, Rob R (2000) The dynamics of technological adoption in hardware/software systems: The case of compact disc players. RAND J. Econom. 31(1):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould ED, Pashigian BP, Prendergast CJ (2005) Contracts, externalities, and incentives in shopping malls. Rev. Econom. Statist. 87(3):411–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Rysman M (2015) Platform pricing at sports card conventions. J. Indust. Econom. 63(4):704–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser U, Wright J (2006) Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 24(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H (2010) Dynamics of pricing in the video game console market: Skimming or penetration? J. Marketing Res. 47(2):428–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM (1995) Diffusion of new products: Empirical generalizations and managerial uses. Marketing Sci. 14(3-suppl):G79–G88.Link, Google Scholar
• Morningstar (2014) Powerful network effect makes Alibaba a rare find. (July 9), http://www.morningstar.com/topics/t/94162328/powerful-network-effect-makes-alibaba-a-rare-find.htm.Google Scholar
• Nair H, Chintagunta P, Dubé J-P (2004) Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(1):23–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ohashi H (2003) The role of network effects in the U.S. VCR market, 1978–1986. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(4):447–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S (2004) Quantitative analysis of network externalities in competing technologies: The VCR case. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(4):937–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pashigian BP, Gould ED (1998) Internalizing externalities: The pricing of space in shopping malls. J. Law Econom. 41(1):115–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pattabhiramaiah A, Sriram S, Sridhar H (2013) Rising prices under declining preferences: The case of the U.S. print newspaper industry. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Petrin A (2002) Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan. J. Political Econom. 110(4):705–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE (2014) Even the rich can make themselves poor: A critical examination of IV methods in marketing applications. Marketing Sci. 33(5):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2004) A study of the market for yellow pages. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):483–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(3):125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seamans R, Zhu F (2014) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Shankar V, Bayus BL (2003) Network effects and competition: An empirical analysis of the home video game industry. Strategic Management J. 24(4):375–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song M (2013) Estimating platform market power in two-sided markets with an application to magazine advertising. Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
• Sriram S, Manchanda P, Bravo ME, Chu J, Ma L, Song M, Shriver S, Subramanian U (2015) Platforms: A multiplicity of research opportunities. Marketing Lett. 26(2):141–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun L, Rajiv S, Chu J (2015) Beyond the more the merrier: Variety effects in system markets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Vitorino MA (2012) Empirical entry games with complementarities: An application to the shopping center industry. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang HH (2012) Looking at the world upside down. Wang HH, ed. The Chinese Dream: The Rise of the World’s Largest Middle Class and What It Means to You, 2nd ed. (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Seattle), 153–170.Google Scholar
• White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3)356–378.Link, Google Scholar