Motivation of User-Generated Content: Social Connectedness Moderates the Effects of Monetary Rewards
Published Online:21 Feb 2017https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.1022
References
- (1999) The market for evaluations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(3):564–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. J. Marketing Res. 51(3): 286–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Incentives and pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates. Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J. Consumer Res. 14(3):350–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Sci. 54(3):477–491.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Sites that pay the shopper for being a seller. New York Times (October 2), http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/03/business/media/shopping-sites-pay-contributors-who-drive-traffic-to-retailers.html.Google Scholar
- (2011) Yelp and the “1/9/90 rule.” Yelp official blog. (June 10), https://www.yelpblog.com/2011/06/yelp-and-the-1-9-90-rule.Google Scholar
- (1986) People who use people: The other side of opinion leadership. Adv. Consumer Res. 13(1):301–305.Google Scholar
- (2001) Motivational interactions: Effects on behaviour. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 131–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Explicit incentives in online communities: Boon or bane? Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 17(1): 11–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) An exchange theory model of interpersonal communication. Lutz RJ, ed. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13 (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), 534–538.Google Scholar
- (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4): 191–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? J. Interactive Marketing 18(1):38–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psych. Sci. 15(11):787–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Automated marketing research using online customer reviews. J. Marketing Res. 48(5):881–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspect. 21(2):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) How online reviews create social network value: The role of feedback versus individual motivation. J. Strategic Marketing 23(December):1–16.Google Scholar
- (2010) Research Methods in Practice: Strategies for Description and Causation (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
- (2000) The Anatomy of Buzz (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
- (2017) Field experiments in marketing. Duflo E, Banerjee A, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Vol. 1 (North Holland, Amsterdam), Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Does paying for online product reviews pay off? The effects of monetary incentives on consumers’ product evaluations. INSEAD Working Paper 2012/96/MKT, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
- (2012) The best book reviews money can buy. New York Times (August 25), http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/26/business/book-reviewers-for-hire-meet-a-demand-for-online-raves.html.Google Scholar
- (2015) The “Peter Pan syndrome,” in emerging markets: The productivity-transparency trade-off in IT adoption. Marketing Sci. 34(4):500–521.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Like shopping? Social networking? Try social shopping. New York Times (September 11), http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/11/technology/11ecom.html.Google Scholar
- (2013) Intrinsic versus image-related motivations in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Receiver responses to rewarded referrals: The motive inferences framework. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 41(6):669–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.Crossref, Google Scholar

