Estimating Search Benefits from Path-Tracking Data: Measurement and Determinants

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1026

References

  • Aguiar M, Hurst E (2005) Consumption versus expenditure. J. Political Econom. 113(5):919–948.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrews RL, Srinivasan TC (1995) Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):30–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Vanhonacker WR (1996) Limited choice sets, local price response and implied measures of price competition. J. Marketing Res. 33(2):163–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Kruger MW, Mela CF (2008) The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. 27(4):745–748.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Yao S (2016) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 28, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2557.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb CJ, Hoyer WD (1985) Direct observation of search behavior in the purchase of two nondurable products. Psych. Marketing 2(3):161–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Los Santos BI, Hortacsu A, Wildenbeest M (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on Web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickson PR, Sawyer AG (1990) The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. J. Marketing 54(3):42–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Draganska M, Klapper D (2011) Choice set heterogeneity and the role of advertising: An analysis with micro and macro data. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):653–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the U.S. auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E, Chintagunta P (2017) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the U.S. auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoyer WD (1984) An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. J. Consumer Res. 11(3):822–829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui SK, Bradlow ET, Fader PS (2009a) Testing behavioral hypotheses using an integrated model of grocery store shopping path and purchase behavior. J. Consumer Res. 36(3):478–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui SK, Bradlow ET, Fader PS (2009b) The traveling salesman goes shopping: The systematic deviations of grocery paths from TSP optimality. Marketing Sci. 28(3):566–572.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hui SK, Fader PS, Bradlow ET (2009c) Path data in marketing: An integrative framework and prospectus for model building. Marketing Sci. 28(2):320–335.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hui SK, Huang Y, Suher J, Inman J (2013) Deconstructing the first moment of truth: Understanding unplanned consideration and purchase conversion using in-store video tracking. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):445–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inman JJ, McAlister L (1993) A retailer promotion policy model considering promotion signal sensitivity. Marketing Sci. 12(4):339–356.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Inman JJ, McAlister L, Hoyer WD (1990) Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut? J. Consumer Res. 17(1):74–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain A, Misra S, Rudi N (2016) Sales assistance, search and purchase decisions: An analysis using retail video data. Working paper, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koulayev S (2014) Search for differentiated products: Identification and estimation. RAND J. Econom. 45(3):553–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCall JJ (1970) Economics of information and job search. Quart. J. Econom. 84(1):221–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. 22(1):58–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy S, Ratchford BT, Talukdar D (1997) Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Consumer Res. 23(4):263–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford BT (1982) Cost-benefit models for explaining consumer choice and information seeking behavior. Management Sci. 28(2):197–212.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford BT, Srinivasan N (1993) An empirical investigation of returns to search. Marketing Sci. 12(1):73–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts JH, Lattin JM (1991) Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):429–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seiler S (2013) The impact of search costs on consumer behavior: A dynamic approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. 11(2):155–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorensen H (2003) The science of shopping. Marketing Res. 15(3):31–35.Google Scholar
  • Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, ed. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, New York),80–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stüttgen P, Boatwright P, Monroe RT (2012) A satisficing choice model. Marketing Sci. 31(6):878–899.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.