Competitive Mobile Geo Targeting
Published Online:23 May 2017https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1030
References
- (2006) Advertising content. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Mobile ad effectiveness: Hyper-contextual targeting with crowdedness. Marketing Sci. 35(2):218–233.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Which products are best suited to mobile advertising? A field study of mobile display advertising effects on consumer attitudes and intentions. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):270–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Competitive price discrimination strategies in a vertical channel using aggregate retail data. Management Sci. 49(9):1121–1138.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) Third-degree price discrimination in oligopoly: All-out competition and strategic commitment. RAND J. Econom. 29(2):306–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Where, when, and how long: Factors that influence the redemption of mobile phone coupons. J. Marketing Res. 52(5):710–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. 20(3):265–283.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) “Let me talk to my manager”: Haggling in a competitive environment. Marketing Sci. 23(2):219–233.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) The strategic role of exchange promotions. Marketing Sci. 35(1):93–112.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Competitive price targeting with smartphone coupons. Marketing Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- eMarketer (2014a) Mobile continues to steal share of U.S. adults’ daily time spent with media. (April 22), http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Mobile-Continues-Steal-Share-of-US-Adults-Daily-Time-Spent-with-Media/1010782.Google Scholar
- eMarketer (2014b) Driven by Facebook and Google, mobile ad market soars 105% in 2013. (March 19), http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Driven-by-Facebook-Google-Mobile-Ad-Market-Soars-10537-2013/1010690.Google Scholar
- (2015) Geo-conquesting: Competitive locational targeting of mobile promotions. J. Marketing Res. 52(5):726–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Customer poaching and brand switching. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):634–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) How is the mobile Internet different? Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):613–631.Link, Google Scholar
- (1929) Stability in competition. Econom. J. 39:41–57.Google Scholar
- (2013) The effect of in-store travel distance on unplanned spending: Applications to mobile promotion strategies. J. Marketing 77(2):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Supermarket competition: The case of every day low pricing. Marketing Sci. 16(1):60–80.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Mobile targeting. Management Sci. 60(7):1738–1756.Link, Google Scholar
- NinthDecimal (2014) Mobile audience insights report: Q2 2014 spotlight on retail. http://www.ninthdecimal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/ND_Insights_Q2_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2008) Behavior-based discrimination: Is it a winning play, and if so, when? Marketing Sci. 27(6):977–994.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. 14(4):395–416.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Competitive one-to-one promotions. Management Sci. 48(9):1143–1160.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Behavioral-based advertising. Management Sci. ePub ahead of print May 11, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2719.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) A customer management dilemma: When is it profitable to reward one’s own customers? Marketing Sci. 29(4):671–689.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) When to “Fire” customers: Customer cost-based pricing. Management Sci. 58(5):932–947.Link, Google Scholar
- (1989) Product variety and competitive discounts. J. Econom. Theory 48(2):510–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Price discrimination in competitive environments. Armstrong M, Porter RH, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 2221–2299.Google Scholar
- (2014) The strategic value of high-cost customers. Management Sci. 60(2):494–507.Link, Google Scholar
- (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar
- (1999) Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Zebra Technologies (2015) In the era of digital technology, the personal touch still makes a difference. White paper, https://www.zebra.com/content/dam/zebra_new_ia/en-us/solutions-verticals/vertical-solutions/retail/white-paper/zebra-2015-shopper-study-white-paper-en.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2011) The perils of behavior-based personalization. Marketing Sci. 30(1):170–186.Link, Google Scholar

