Online Reputation Management: Estimating the Impact of Management Responses on Consumer Reviews

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1043

References

  • Ashenfelter OC, Card D (1985) Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. Rev. Econom. Statist. 67(4):648–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boes S, Winkelmann R (2006) Ordered response models. Hubler O, Frohn J, eds. Modern Econometric Analysis (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 167–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai W, Jin GZ, Lee J, Luca M (2012) Optimal aggregation of consumer ratings: An application to Yelp.com. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Dellarocas C, Wood CA (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Sci. 54(3):460–476.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DiPrete TA, Gangl M (2004) Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociol. Methodology 34(1):271–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donald SG, Lang K (2007) Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(2):221–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D, Pearson M (2014) Reporting bias and reciprocity in online reviews: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  • Godes D, Silva JC (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen BB, Rosenbaum PR, Small DS (2014) Clustered treatment assignments and sensitivity to unmeasured biases in observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 109(505):133–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ, Smith JA (1999) The pre-programme earnings dip and the determinants of participation in a social programme. Implications for simple programme evaluation strategies. Econom. J. 109(457):313–348.Google Scholar
  • Hui X, Saeedi M, Shen Z, Sundaresan N (2016) Reputation and regulations: Evidence from eBay. Management Sci. 62(12):3604–3616.Google Scholar
  • Jepsen C, Troske K, Coomes P (2014) The labor-market returns to community college degrees, diplomas, and certificates. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):95–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Gan C, Hu B (2011) The welfare impact of microcredit on rural households in China. J. Socio-Econom. 40(4):404–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luca M (2011) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Technical report, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier J (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2421–2455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCollough MA, Berry LL, Yadav MS (2000) An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. J. Service Res. 3(2):121–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ockenfels A, Resnick P, Bolton G, Croson R (2012) Negotiating reputations. Bolton G, Croson R, eds. Oxford Handbook of Economic Conflict Resolution (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK),223–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Resnick P, Zeckhauser R (2002) Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. Baye MR, ed. The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce, Adv. Applied Microeconomics, Vol. 11 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 127–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR (2002) Observational Studies (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith AK, Bolton RN, Wagner J (1999) A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. J. Marketing Res. 36(3):356–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tax SS, Brown SW, Chandrashekaran M (1998) Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. J. Marketing 62(2):60–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terza JV (1985) Ordinal probit: A generalization. Comm. Statist.-Theory Methods 14(1):1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers J (2015) A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.