Online Reputation Management: Estimating the Impact of Management Responses on Consumer Reviews
Published Online:18 Aug 2017https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1043
References
- (1985) Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. Rev. Econom. Statist. 67(4):648–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Ordered response models. Hubler O, Frohn J, eds. Modern Econometric Analysis (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Optimal aggregation of consumer ratings: An application to Yelp.com. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Sci. 54(3):460–476.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociol. Methodology 34(1):271–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(2):221–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Reporting bias and reciprocity in online reviews: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Clustered treatment assignments and sensitivity to unmeasured biases in observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 109(505):133–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) The pre-programme earnings dip and the determinants of participation in a social programme. Implications for simple programme evaluation strategies. Econom. J. 109(457):313–348.Google Scholar
- (2016) Reputation and regulations: Evidence from eBay. Management Sci. 62(12):3604–3616.Google Scholar
- (2014) The labor-market returns to community college degrees, diplomas, and certificates. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):95–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) The welfare impact of microcredit on rural households in China. J. Socio-Econom. 40(4):404–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Technical report, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2421–2455.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. J. Service Res. 3(2):121–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Negotiating reputations. Bolton G, Croson R, eds. Oxford Handbook of Economic Conflict Resolution (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK),223–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. Baye MR, ed. The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce, Adv. Applied Microeconomics, Vol. 11 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 127–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Observational Studies (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. J. Marketing Res. 36(3):356–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. J. Marketing 62(2):60–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Ordinal probit: A generalization. Comm. Statist.-Theory Methods 14(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar

