Changing Their Tune: How Consumers’ Adoption of Online Streaming Affects Music Consumption and Discovery

References

• Adler M (1985) Stardom and talent. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(1):208–212.Google Scholar
• Aguiar L (2017) Let the music play? Free streaming and its effects on digital music consumption. Inform. Econom. Policy 41:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguiar L, Waldfogel J (2015) Streaming reaches flood stage: Does Spotify stimulate or depress music sales? Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander P (1997) Product variety and market structure: A new measure and a simple test. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 32(2):207–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B (2015) The provision of convenience and variety by the market. RAND J. Econom. 46(3):480–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B, Dubé JP, Mela C (2010) Do digital video recorders influence sales? J. Marketing Res. 47(6):998–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron S, Collins A (1997) Transaction costs and partnerships: The case of rock bands. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 32(2):171–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung K, Cox A (1994) A stochastic model of superstardom: An application of the Yule distribution. Rev. Econom. Statist. 76(4):771–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung T, Rust R, Wedel M (2009) My mobile music: An adaptive personalization system for digital audio players. Marketing Sci. 28(1):52–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Crain W, Tollison R (2002) Consumer choice and the popular music industry: A test of the superstar theory. Empirica 29:1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberse A (2008) Should you invest in the long tail? Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(7–8):88–96.Google Scholar
• Friedlander JP (2016) News and notes on 2015 RIAA shipment and revenue statistics. https://www.riaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/RIAA-2015-Year-End-shipments-memo.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gensler S, Leeflang P, Skiera B (2012) Impact of online channel use on customer revenues and costs to serve: Considering product portfolios and self-selection. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 29(2):192–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamlen W (1991) Superstardom in popular music: Empirical evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 73(4):729–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ, Bradlow ET, Wansink B (1999) The variety of an assortment. Marketing Sci. 18(4):527–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Hirschman E (1982) The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):132–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Allenby GM, Rossi PE (2002) Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. 21(3):229–250.Link, Google Scholar
• Kissel C (2015) Spotify listeners discover roughly 27 new artists a month. Diffuser (July 23), http://diffuser.fm/spotify-listeners-discover-roughly-27-new-artists-a-month/.Google Scholar
• Lacher KT, Mizerski R (1994) An exploratory study of the response and relationships involved in the evaluation of, and in the intention to purchase new rock music. J. Consumer Res. 21(2):366–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes P (1992) Innovation and diversity in the popular music industry, 1969 to 1990. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(1):56–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Packard G, Pattabhiramaiah A (2015) Social dollars: The economic impact of customer participation in a firm-sponsored online customer community. Marketing Sci. 34(3):367–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Mitroff S, Blanco X (2015) Apple Music vs. Spotify: What’s the difference? CNET (July 2), https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-music-vs-spotify-whats-the-difference/.Google Scholar
• Mortimer J, Nosko C, Sorensen A (2012) Supply responses to digital distribution: Recorded music and live performances. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2014) Nielsen Music U.S. Report. http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/kr/docs/global-report/2014/2014%20Nielsen%20Music%20US%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Zalmanson L (2013) Content or community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. MIS Quart. 37(2):591–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (K) plan participation rates. J. Appl. Econometrics 11(6):619–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratner RK, Kahn BE, Kahneman D (1999) Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. J. Consumer Res. 26(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rob R, Waldfogel J (2006) Piracy on the high C’s: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students. J. Law Econom. 49(1):29–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1981) The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(5):845–858.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spotify (2016) Streaming state of mind. https://spotifyforbrands.com/us/insight/streaming-state-of-mind/.Google Scholar
• Spotify (2017a) Fast facts. https://press.spotify.com/us/about/.Google Scholar
• Spotify (2017b) Spotify for brands. https://spotifyforbrands.com/us/.Google Scholar
• van Herpen E, Pieters R (2002) The variety of an assortment: An extension to the attribute-based approach. Marketing Sci. 21(3):331–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2012) Music piracy and its effects on demand, supply, and welfare. Innovation Policy Econom. 12(1):91–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wlömert N, Papies D (2016) On-demand streaming services and music industry revenues—Insights from Spotify’s market entry. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 33(2):314–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zentner A (2006) Measuring the effect of online piracy on music sales. J. Law Econom. 49(1):63–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zentner A, Smith M, Kaya C (2013) How video rental patterns change as consumers move online. Management Sci. 59(11):2622–2634.Link, Google Scholar