Super Bowl Ads

References

• Aaker J (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. J. Marketing Res. 34(3):347–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerberg D (2001) Empirically distinguishing informative and prestige effects of advertising. RAND J. Econom. 32(2):316–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Associated Press (2009) Pepsi turns ad focus online. (December 17), http://www.espn.com/nfl/news/story?id=4751415.Google Scholar
• Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Handbook Indust. Organ. 3:1701–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G, Murphy K (1993) A simple theory of advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 108(4):941–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Karlan D, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zinman J (2010) What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 125(1): 263–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B, Dhar S, Dubé JP (2009) Brand history, geography, and the persistence of brand shares. J. Political Econom. 117(1):87–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B, Kruger M, Mela C (2008) The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. 27(4):745–748.Link, Google Scholar
• Crupi A (2012) CBS halfway to a Super Bowl sellout. AdWeek (May 30). http://www.adweek.com/tv-video/cbs-halfway-super-bowl-sellout-140844/.Google Scholar
• Doganoglu T, Klapper D (2006) Goodwill and dynamic advertising strategies. Quant. Marketing Econom. 4(1):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doraszelski U, Markovich S (2007) Advertising dynamics and competitive advantage. RAND J. Econom. 38(3):557–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch G, Manchanda P (2005) An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(2):107–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch G, Rossi P (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3): 417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fennell G (1997) Value and values: Relevance to advertising. Kahle L, Chiagouris L, eds. Values, Lifestyles, and Psychographics (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 83–110.Google Scholar
• Lewis R, Rao J (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lodish L, Abraham M, Kalmenson S, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME (1995) How T.V. advertising works: A meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable T.V. advertising experiments. J. Marketing Res. 32(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynch J (2015) CBS is holding some Super Bowl ad slots to sell last minute for “north of $5 million.” AdWeek (December 7), http://www.adweek.com/tv-video/cbs-holding-back-some-its-super-bowl-50-ad-inventory-168488/.Google Scholar
• McGranaghan M, Liaukonyte J, Wilbur K, Teixeira T (2016) Watching people watch TV. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Nerlove M, Arrow KJ (1962) Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica 29(114):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiley D Jr, Lewis RA (2013) Down-to-the-minute effects of Super Bowl advertising on online search behavior. Working paper, Google. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2227122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE (2014) Even the rich can make themselves poor: A critical examination of the use of IV methods in marketing. Marketing Sci. 33(5):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Sahni N (2015) Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from an online field experiment. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(3):203–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snavely B (2016) New GM ads hit Ford hard over aluminum pickup trucks. USA Today (June 8), http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2016/06/08/gm-hits-ford-hard-over-aluminum-pickup-trucks-ads/85605192/.Google Scholar
• Stephens-Davidowitz S, Varian H, Smith MD (2017) Super returns to Super Bowl ads? Quant. Marketing Econom. 15(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vranica S (2009) Pepsi benches its drinks. Wall Street Journal (December 17), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703581204574600322164130250.Google Scholar
• Williams S (2014) The 5 critical states where Ford sells the most F-series pickups. Motley Fool (August 17), http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/08/17/the-5-critical-states-where-ford-sells-the-most-f.aspx.Google Scholar
• Yang S, Allenby GM, Fennell G (2002) Modeling variation in brand preference: The roles of objective environment and motivating conditions. Marketing Sci. 21(1):14–31.Link, Google Scholar