Advertising to Early Trend Propagators: Evidence from Twitter

References

• Abratt R, Nel D, Nezer C (1995) Role of the market maven in retailing: A general marketplace influencer. J. Bus. Psych. 10(1):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakaki D, Polakis I, Athanasopoulos E, Ioannidis S, Fragopoulou P (2015) Think before RT: An experimental study of abusing Twitter trends. Aiello LM, McFarland D, eds. Social Informatics, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Vol. 8852 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 402–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arvidsson A, Caliandro A (2016) Brand public. J. Consumer Res. 42(5):727–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asur S, Huberman BA (2010) Predicting the future with social media. Web Intelligence Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM Internat. Conf., Vol. 1, 492–499.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Ellison G (2011) Position auctions with consumer search. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1213–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Hofman JM, Mason WA, Watts DJ (2011) Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. Proc. Fourth ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining, WSDM ’11 (ACM, New York), 65–74.Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger J (2014) Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J. Consumer Psych. 24(4):586–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X (2011) Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J. Comput. Sci. 2(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bughin J (2003) The diffusion of Internet banking in Western Europe. Electronic Markets 13(3):251–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha M, Haddadi H, Benevenuto F, Gummadi PK (2010) Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Cohen WW, Gosling S, eds. Proc. Fourth Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media (ICWSM) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA), 10–17.Google Scholar
• Chen GH, Nikolov S, Shah D (2013) A latent source model for nonparametric time series classification. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, 1088–1096.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang Q, Xie J (2011) Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):238–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Childers T (1986) An assessment of the psychometric properties of an opinion leadership scale. J. Marketing Res. 23(2):184–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK (2001) Endogeneity and heterogeneity in a probit demand model: Estimation using aggregate data. Marketing Sci. 20(4):442–456.Link, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1980) The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 13(2):39–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) The general causality orientations scale:Self-determination in personality. J. Res. Personality 19(2):109–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du RY, Kamakura WA (2012) Quantitative trendspotting. J. Marketing Res. 49(4):514–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Luo X, Fang Z (2017) Self-signaling and prosocial behavior: A cause marketing experiment. Marketing Sci. 36(2):161–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Falkinger J (2008) Limited attention as a scarce resource in information-rich economies. Econom. J. 118(532):1596–1620.Google Scholar
• Feick LF, Price LL (1987) The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. J. Marketing 51(1):83–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flath D, Leonard EW (1979) A comparison of two logit models in the analysis of qualitative marketing data. J. Marketing Res. 16(4):533–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management Sci. 55(10):1605–1622.Link, Google Scholar
• Goel S, Hofman JM, Lahaie S, Pennock DM, Watts DJ (2010) Predicting consumer behavior with web search. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107(41):17486–17490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011a) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011b) Search engine advertising: Channel substitution when pricing ads to context. Management Sci. 57(3):458–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith RE, Hofacker CF (1991) Measuring consumer innovativeness. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 19(3):209–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong S, Zhang J, Zhao P, Jiang X (2017) Tweeting as a marketing tool? Field experiment in the TV industry. J. Marketing Res. 54(6):833–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Skiera B, Barrot C, Becker JU (2011) Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. J. Marketing 75(6):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishihara M, Ching A (2012) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of Japanese video games. Working paper, Rotman School of Management, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli A, Tan BC, Wei K-K (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 29(1):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Zubcsek PP, Sarvary M (2011) Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):425–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. Ninth ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 137–146.Google Scholar
• King CW, Summers JO (1970) Overlap of opinion leadership across product categories. Marketing Res. 7(1):43–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong S, Mei Q, Feng L, Zhao Z (2014) Real-time predicting bursting hashtags on Twitter. Li F, Li G, Hwang S, Yao B, Zhang Z, eds. Web-Age Inform. Management, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Vol. 8485 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 268–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krauss RM, Fussell SR (1991) Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others’ knowledge in reference. Soc. Cogniition 9(1):2–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2013) When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. J. Marketing Res. 50(5):561–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2014) Online ads and offline sales: Measuring the effect of retail advertising via a controlled experiment on Yahoo! Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(3):235–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao J, Reiley D (2011) Here, there, everywhere: Correlated online behaviors can lead to overestimates of the effects of advertising. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 157–166.Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Dubé J-P, Goh KY, Chintagunta PK (2006) The effect of banner advertising on Internet purchasing. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):98–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathwick C, Rigdon E (2004) Play, flow, and the online search experience. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):324–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy A, Gupta S (2000) Innovation adoption and diffusion in the digital environment: Some research opportunities. Mahajan V, Muller E, Wind Y, eds. New Product Diffusion Models (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), 75–96.Google Scholar
• Rogers E (1962) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE (2011) From generic to branded: A model of spillover dynamics in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):87–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM (1982) Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(3):450–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Ed. Psych. 25(1):54–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan S, Tucker C (2012) Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(1):63–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni N (2015) Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from an online field experiment. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(3):203–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Toubia O (2010) Deriving value from social commerce networks. J. Marketing Res. 47(2):215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Toubia O (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Stonedahl F, Rand W, Wilensky U (2010) Evolving viral marketing strategies. Proc. 12th Annual Conf. Genetic Evolutionary Comput. (ACM, New York), 1195–1202.Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT, Freud A (2009) Viral marketing: A large-scale field experiment. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Vaynerchuck G (2013) How to master the 4 big social-media platforms. Inc. Magazine. https://www.inc.com/magazine/201311/gary-vaynerchuk/how-to-master-the-four-major-social-media-platforms.html.Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Dodds PS (2007) Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. 34(4):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weng J, Lim E-P, Jiang J, He Q (2010) Twitterrank: Finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. Proc. Third ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (ACM, New York), 261–270.Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2012) Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(1):111–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2016) Modeling the role of message content and influencers in social media rebroadcasting. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 34(1):100–119.Crossref, Google Scholar