Competition and Crowd-Out for Brand Keywords in Sponsored Search

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1065

References

  • Agarwal A, Hosanagar K, Smith MD (2011) Location, location, location: An analysis of profitability of position in online advertising markets. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):1057–1073.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectivness: A large scale field experiment. Econometrica 83(1):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiou L, Tucker C (2012) How does the use of trademarks by third-party sellers affect online search? Marketing Sci. 31(5):819–837.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Craswell N, Zoeter O, Taylor M, Ramsey B (2008) An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. Proc. 2008 Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (ACM, New York), 87–94.Google Scholar
  • Desai PS, Shin W, Staelin R (2014) The company that you keep: When to buy a competitor’s keyword. Marketing Sci. 33(4):485–508.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dupret GE, Piwowarski B (2008) A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. Proc. 31st Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (ACM, New York), 331–338.Google Scholar
  • Goldman M, Rao JM (2014) Experiments as instruments: Heterogeneous position effects in sponsored search auctions. Working paper, University of California San Diego. Google Scholar
  • Granka LA, Joachims T, Gay G (2004) Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search. Proc. 27th Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (ACM, New York),478–479.Google Scholar
  • Jerath K, Ma L, Park Y-H, Srinivasan K (2011) A “position paradox” in sponsored search auctions. Marketing Sci. 30(4):612–627.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeziorski P, Segal I (2015) What makes them click: Empirical analysis of consumer demand for search advertising. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 7(3):24–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar R, Tomkins A (2010) A characterization of online browsing behavior. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 561–570.Google Scholar
  • Lewis R, Nguyen D (2015) Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(2):93–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Kalyanam K (2015) Position effects in search advertising and their moderators: A regression discontinuity approach. Marketing Sci. 34(4):612–627.Google Scholar
  • Reiley DH, Li S-M, Lewis RA (2010) Northern exposure: A field experiment measuring externalities between search advertisements. Proc. 11th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York),297–304.Google Scholar
  • Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE (2011) From generic to branded: A model of spillover in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):87–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sayedi A, Jerath K, Srinivasan K (2014) Competitive poaching in sponsored search advertising and its strategic impact on traditional advertising. Marketing Sci. 33(3):388–407.Google Scholar
  • Thisse J-F, Vives X (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar
  • Yang S, Ghose A (2010) Analyzing the relationship between organic and sponsored search advertising: Positive, negative, or zero interdependence? Marketing Sci. 29(4):602–623.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang S, Lu S, Lu X (2013) Modeling competition and its impact on paid-search advertising. Marketing Sci. 33(1):134–153.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.