Showrooming and Webrooming: Information Externalities Between Online and Offline Sellers

References

• Bakos Y (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. 43(12):1676–1692.Link, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S (1998) Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Sci. 17(3):181–195.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Smith M (2000) Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. 46(4):563–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlton D, Chevalier J (2001) Free riding and sales strategies for the Internet. J. Indust. Econom. 49(4):441–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che Y (1996) Consumer return policies for experience goods. J. Indust. Econom. 44(1):17–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coughlan A, Anderson E, Stern L, El-Ansary A (2001) Marketing Channels (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Davis S, Gerstner E, Hagerty M (1995) Money back guarantees in retailing: Matching products to consumer tastes. J. Retailing 71(1):7–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewoldt J (2017) Walmart adds Minnesota stores to locations that will no longer match rivals’ prices. Star Tribune (June 21). http://www.startribune.com/walmart-adds-minnesota-stores-to-locations-that-will-no-longer-match-rivals-prices/430002493/.Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Goldfarb A (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Hay G (1982) Oligopoly, shared monopoly, and antitrust law. Cornell Law Rev. 67(3):439–481.Google Scholar
• Hess J, Chu W, Gerstner E (1996) Controlling product returns in direct marketing. Marketing Lett. 7(4):307–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Kuksov D (2012) Competition in consumer shopping experience. Marketing Sci. 31(6):913–933.Link, Google Scholar
• Jing B (2011) Exogenous learning, seller-induced learning, and marketing of durable goods. Management Sci. 57(10):1788–1801.Link, Google Scholar
• Jing B (2016) Lowering customer evaluation costs, product differentiation, and price competition. Marketing Sci. 35(1):113–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Kireyev P, Kumar V, Ofek E (2017) Match your own price? Self-matching as a retailer’s multichannel pricing strategy. Marketing Sci. 36(6):908–930.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D (2004) Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. 23(4):490–499.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Liao C (2018) When showrooming increases retailer profit. J. Marketing Res. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Matutes C (1994) Retail pricing and advertising strategies. J. Bus. 67(3):345–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Sarvary M (1999) When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition? Marketing Sci. 18(4):485–503.Link, Google Scholar
• Loginova O (2009) Real and virtual competition. J. Indust. Econom. 57(2):319–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy S, Winter R (2006) Price-matching guarantees. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):449–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofek E, Katona Z, Sarvary M (2011) “Bricks and clicks”: The impacts of product returns on the strategies of multichannel retailers. Marketing Sci. 30(1):42–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Olenski S (2013) How retail brands are using technology to provide added value to consumers. Forbes (November 25). https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveolenski/2013/11/25/how-retail-brands-are-using-technology-to-provide-added-value-to-consumers/#83cdc8a74ba8.Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V, Png IPL (1997) Manufacturer’s returns policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. 16(1):81–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Petro G (2017) Amazon’s acquisition of Whole Foods is about two things: Data and product. Forbes (August 2). https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregpetro/2017/08/02/amazons-acquisition-of-whole-foods-is-about-two-things-data-and-product/#e8fd2d1a8084.Google Scholar
• Png IPL, Hirshleifer D (1987) Price discrimination through offers to match price. J. Bus. 60(3):365–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roose K (2017) Best Buy’s secrets for thriving in the Amazon age. New York Times (September 18).Google Scholar
• Shin J (2007) How does free riding on customer service affect competition? Marketing Sci. 26(4):488–503.Link, Google Scholar
• Shulman J, Coughlan A, Savaskan C (2011) Managing consumer returns in a competitive environment. Management Sci. 57(2):347–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Singley R, Williams M (1995) Free-riding in retailer stores: An investigation of its perceived prevalence and costs. J. Marketing Theory Practice 3(2):64–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl D (1989) Oligopolistic pricing with sequential consumer search. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(4):700–712.Google Scholar
• Telser L (1960) Why should manufacturers want fair trade? J. Law Econom. 3(October):86–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuttle B (2012) Target doesn’t want to be a showroom for the stuff you buy for less at Amazon. Time (January 24).Google Scholar
• Wahba P (2016) Here is how Walmart is re-igniting its ecommerce growth. Fortune (August 18). http://fortune.com/2016/08/18/walmart-ecommerce-2/.Google Scholar
• Wu D, Ray G, Geng X, Whinston A (2004) Implications of reduced search cost and free-riding in e-commerce. Marketing Sci. 23(2):255–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Zettelmeyer F (2000) Expanding to the Internet: Pricing and communications strategies when firms compete on multiple channels. J. Marketing Res. 37(3):292–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X (2009) Retailers’ multichannel and price advertising strategies. Marketing Sci. 28(6):1080–1094.Link, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman A (2012) Can retailers halt “showrooming”? Wall Street Journal (April 11).Google Scholar