Advertising in Health Insurance Markets

References

• Abaluck J, Gruber J (2011) Heterogeneity in choice inconsistencies among the elderly: Evidence from prescription drug plan choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):377–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aizawa N, Kim YS (2018) Advertising competition and risk selection in health insurance markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(3):828–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayer P, Ferreira F, McMillan R (2007) A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods. J. Political Econom. 115(4):588–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black SE (1999) Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):577–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large-scale field experiment. Econometrica 83(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral M, Mahoney N, Geruso M (2018) Do larger health insurance subsidies benefit patients or producers? Evidence from Medicare Advantage. Amer. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai X, Kreps G, McAuley J, Zhao X, Strollo M, Neuman T, Boortz K (2008) Pitching private Medicare plans: An analysis of Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan advertising. Report, Kaiser Family Foundation. https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/7805.pdf.Google Scholar
• Cooper AL, Trivedi AN (2012) Fitness memberships and favorable selection in Medicare Advantage plans. New England J. Medicine 366(2):150–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cosgrove JC, Brudevold C, George S, Giusto G, O’Donnell B, Morrison ET (2013) Medicare Advantage: 2011 profits similar to projections for most plans, but higher for plans with specific eligibility requirements. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC. Accessed July 12, 2018, https://www.gao.gov/assets/660/659836.pdf.Google Scholar
• Curto V, Einav L, Levin J, Bhattacharya J (2015) Can managed competition work? The U.S. Medicare Advantage Program. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Dafny LS (2010) Are health insurance markets competitive? Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1399–1431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dube A, Lester TW, Reich M (2010) Minimum wage effects across state borders: Estimates using contiguous counties. Rev. Econom. Statist. 92(4):945–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duggan M, Starc A, Vabson B (2016) Who benefits when the government pays more? Pass-through in the Medicare Advantage program. J. Public Econom. 141:50–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eastlack JO Jr, Rao AG (1986) Modeling response to advertising and pricing changes for “V-8” cocktail vegetable juice. Marketing Sci. 5(3):245–259.Link, Google Scholar
• Ericson KM (2014) When consumers do not make an active decision: Dynamic default rules and their equilibrium effects. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forelle C, Bandler J (2006) The perfect payday. Wall Street Journal. Accessed July 12, 2018, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB114265075068802118.Google Scholar
• Handel BR (2013) Adverse selection and inertia in health insurance markets: When nudging hurts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2643–2682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Klapper D (2018) Super bowl ads. Marketing Sci. 37(1):78–96.Link, Google Scholar
• Holmes TJ (1998) The effect of state policies on the location of manufacturing: Evidence from state borders. J. Political Econom. 106(4):667–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ito K (2014) Do consumers respond to marginal or average price? Evidence from nonlinear electricity pricing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(2):537–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson GA, Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2016) When less is more: Data and power in advertising experiments. Marketing Sci. 36(1):43–53.Link, Google Scholar
• Leone RP (1995) Generalizing what is known about temporal aggregation and advertising carryover. Marketing Sci. 14(3, Part 2):G141–G150.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Nguyen D (2015) Display advertising competitive spill-overs to consumer search. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM, Reiley DH (2011) Here, there, and everywhere: Correlated online behaviors can lead to overestimates of the effects of advertising. Ghinita G, Punera K, eds. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 157–166.Google Scholar
• Lodish LM, Abraham M, Kalmenson S, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME (1995) How TV advertising works: A meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable TV advertising experiments. J. Marketing Res. 32(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGuire TG, Newhouse JP, Sinaiko AD (2011) An economic history of Medicare Part C. Milbank Quart. 89(2):289–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehrotra A, Grier S, Dudley RA (2006) The relationship between health plan advertising and market incentives: Evidence of risk-selective behavior. Health Affairs 25(3):759–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2015a) Advertising spillovers: Field-experiment evidence and implications for returns from advertising. J. Marketing Res. 53(4):459–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2015b) Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(3):203–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethuraman R, Tellis GJ, Briesch RA (2011) How well does advertising work? Generalizations from meta-analysis of brand advertising elasticities. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):457–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro B (2018) Positive spillovers and free riding in advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals: The case of antidepressants. J. Political Econom. 126(1):381–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinkinson M, Starc A (2017) Ask your doctor? Direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals. Rev. Econom. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Spenkuch JL, Toniatti D (2018) Political advertising and election outcomes. Quart. J. Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Town R, Liu S (2003) The welfare impact of Medicare HMOs. RAND J. Econom. 34(4):719–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuchman AE (2015) Advertising and demand for addictive goods: The effects of e-cigarette advertising. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Vranica S (2016) Probe said to find rebates lurking behind U.S. ad seals. Wall Street Journal (June 2), https://www.wsj.com/articles/ad-agencies-earn-rebates-from-media-companies-for-ad-spending-probe-finds-1464888210?mod=djemCMOToday.Google Scholar