Inspiration from the “Biggest Loser”: Social Interactions in a Weight Loss Program

References

• Anderson E, Fornell C, Lehmann D (1994) Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. J. Marketing 58(3):53–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Montel Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D, Song S (2007) Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(4):361–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanton H, Buunk B, Gibbons F, Kuyper H (1999) When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(3):420–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Gillingham K (2012) Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Marketing Sci. 31(6):900–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Brewer M, Weber J (1994) Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(2):268–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brock W, Durlauf S (2001) Interaction-based models. Heckman J, Leamer E, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 3297–3380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buunk A, Gibbons F (2007) Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Hui S, Bell D (2010) Spatiotemporal analysis of imitation behavior across new buyers at an online grocery retailer. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):75–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2008) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England J. Medicine 358(4):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini R, Reno R, Kallgren C (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cravens D, Ingram T, LaForge R, Young C (1993) Behavior-based and outcome-based salesforce control systems. J. Marketing 57(4):47–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons G, Fishbach A (2010) Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects on personal goal progress. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(4):535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardete P (2015) Social effects in the in-flight marketplace: Characterization and managerial implications. J. Marketing Res. 52(3):360–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagen L, Krishna A, McFerran B (2016) Rejecting responsibility: Low physical involvement in obtaining food promotes unhealthy eating. J. Marketing Res. 54(4):589–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Manchanda P, Nair HS, Bothner M, Dodds P, Godes D, Hosanagar K, Tucker C (2008) Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 19(3–4):287–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofacker C, de Ruyter K, Lurie N, Manchanda P, Donaldson J (2016) Gamification and mobile marketing effectiveness. J. Interactive Marketing 34(May):25–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imberman S, Kugler A, Sacerdote B (2012) Katrina’s children: Evidence on the structure of peer effects from hurricane evacuees. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2048–2082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente T (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Karlsson N, Loewenstein G, Seppi D (2009) The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(2):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft-Todd G, Bollinger B, Gillingham K, Lamp S, Rand D (2017) Credibility-enhancing displays promote the provision of a non-normative public good. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Umashankar N, Kim K, Bhagwat Y (2014) Assessing the influence of economic and customer experience factors on service purchase behaviors. Marketing Sci. 33(5):673–692.Link, Google Scholar
• Leeflang P, Wieringa J, Bijmolt T, Pauwels K (2015) Modeling Markets: Analyzing Marketing Phenomena and Improving Marketing Decision Making (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockwood P, Jordan C, Kunda Z (2002) Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(4):854–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Ailawadi K, Grewal D (2013) Soda versus cereal and sugar versus fat: Drivers of healthful food intake and the impact of diabetes diagnosis. J. Marketing 77(3):101–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Manski C (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):31–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFerran B, Dahl D, Fitzsimons G, Morales A (2010a) I’ll have what she’s having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. J. Consumer Res. 36(6):915–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFerran B, Dahl D, Fitzsimons G, Morales A (2010b) Might an overweight waitress make you eat more? How the body type of others is sufficient to alter our food consumption. J. Consumer Psych. 20(2):146–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Manchanda P, Bhatia T (2010) Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):883–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayan V, Rao V, Saunders C (2011) How peer influence affects attribute preferences: A Bayesian updating mechanism. Marketing Sci. 30(2):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Olsen R (1980) A least squares correction for selectivity bias. Econometrica 48(7):1815–1820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park H-M, Manchanda P (2014) When Harry bet with Sally: An empirical analysis of multiple peer effects in casino gambling behavior. Marketing Sci. 34(2):179–194.Link, Google Scholar
• Pelham B, Wachsmuth J (1995) The waxing and waning of the social self: Assimilation and contrast in social comparison. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 5(5):825–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers T, Feller A (2016) Discouraged by peer excellence: Exposure to exemplary peer performance causes quitting. Psych. Sci. 27(3):365–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanderson E, Windmeijer F (2016) A weak instrument F-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables. J. Econometrics 190(2):212–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepperd J, Taylor K (1999) Ascribing advantages to social comparison targets. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 21(2):103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien G (2001) Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1409–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S, Narayan V, Assael H (2006) Estimating the interdependence of television program viewership between spouses: A Bayesian simultaneous equation model. Marketing Sci. 25(4):336–349.Link, Google Scholar