U-Shaped Conformity in Online Social Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1133

References

  • Abrams D (2009). Social identity on a national scale: Optimal distinctiveness and young people’s self-expression through musical preference. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 12(3):303–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Levav J (2000) Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. J. Consumer Res. 27(3):279–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aronson E (1972) The Social Animal (Viking Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Asch SE (1952) Social Psychology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austen-Smith D Jr, Fryer RG (2005) An economic analysis of “acting white.” Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):551–583.Google Scholar
  • Badea C, Jetten J, Czukor G, Askevis-Leherpeux F (2010) The bases of identification: When optimal distinctiveness needs face social identity threat. British J. Soc. Psych. 49(1):21–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearman PS, Brückner H (2001) Promising the future: Virginity pledges and first intercourse. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4):859–912.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin, DJ, Choi JJ, Strickland AJ (2010) Social identity and preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1913–1928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Heath C (2008) Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(3):593–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim BD (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):475–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (1993) Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Soc. Cognition 11(1):150–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campo S, Cameron KA (2006) Differential effects of exposure to social norms campaigns: A cause for concern. Health Commun. 19(3):209–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Rigotti L, Rustichini A (2007) Individual behavior and group membership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1340–1352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(6):893–910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB (2003) Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions Psychol. Sci. 12(4):105–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015–1026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Codol J-P (1981) Une approche cognitive du sentiment d'identité. Soc. Sci. Inform. 20(1):111–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Currarini S, Jackson MO, Pin P (2009) An economic model of friendship: Homophily, minorities, and segregation. Econometrica 77(4):1003–1045.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M, Gerard HB (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences and individual judgment. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 51(3):629–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW (2008) Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 102(1):33–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S (2006) The impact of group membership on co-operation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):212–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Goffman E (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(6):1420–1443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griskevicius V, Goldstein NJ, Mortensen CR, Cialdini RB, Kenrick DT (2006) Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(2):281–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haines MP, Barker GP, Rice R (2003) Using social norms to reduce alcohol and tobacco use in two Midwestern high schools. Perkins HW, ed. The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 235–244.Google Scholar
  • Hartmann WR, Manchanda P, Nair H, Bothner M, Dodds P, Godes G, Hosanagar K, Tucker C (2008) Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods, and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 19(3):287–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s Consequences (SAGE, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
  • Hornik R, Jacobsohn L, Orwin R, Piesse A, Kalton G (2008) Effects of the national youth anti-drug media campaign on youths. Amer. J. Public Health 98(12):2229–2236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hornsey MJ, Jetten J (2004) The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(3):248–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horrace WC, Oaxaca RL (2006) Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model. Econom. Lett. 90(3):321–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jetten J, Hornsey MJ, Adarves-Yorno I (2006) When group members admit to being conformist: The role of relative intragroup status in conformity self-reports. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(2):162–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallgren CA, Reno RR, Cialdini RB (2000) A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(8):1002–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim H, Markus HR (1999) Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(4):785–800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossinets G, Watts DJ (2009) Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(2):405–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lau RR (1989) Individual and contextual influences on group identification. Soc. Psych. Quart. 52(3):220–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardelli GJ, Loyd DL (2016) Optimal distinctiveness signals membership trust. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 42(7):843–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardelli GJ, Pickett CL, Brewer MB (2010) Optimal distinctiveness theory: Framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43(2):63–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberson S, Mikelson KS (1995) Distinctive African American names: An experimental, historical, and linguistic analysis of innovation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 60(6):928–946.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malthouse EC, Haenlein M, Skiera B, Wege E, and Zhang XM (2013) Managing customer relationships in the social media era: Introducing the social CRM house. J. Interactive Marketing 27(4):270–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus HR, Kitayama S (1994) A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 20(5):568–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miniard PW, Cohen JB (1983) Modeling personal and normative influences on behavior J. Consum. Res. 10(2):169–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obukhova E, Zuckerman EW, Zhang J (2011) Why was there no fashion in Mao's China? Effects of politics on culture in the case of Chinese naming practices. Working paper, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  • Obukhova E, Zuckerman EW, Zhang J (2014) When politics froze fashion: The effect of the cultural revolution on naming in Beijing. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):555–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perkins HW, Craig DW, Perkins JM (2011) Using social norms to reduce bullying: A research intervention among adolescents in five middle schools. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 14(5):703–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perkins HW, Linkenbach JW, Lewis MA, Neighbors C (2010) Effectiveness of social norms media marketing in reducing drinking and driving: A statewide campaign. Addictive Behav. 35(10):866–874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Zuckerman, EW (2001) Middle status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scharfstein DS, Stein JC (1990) Herd behavior and investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):465–479.Google Scholar
  • Schultz PW (2010) Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 21(1):25–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder CR, Fromkin HL (1980) Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference (Plenum, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 1(2):149–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Triandis HC (1995) Individualism and Collectivism (Westview, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
  • Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesan M (1966) Experimental study of consumer behavior conformity and independence. J. Market Res. 3(4):384–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vignoles VL, Chryssochoou X, Breakwell GM (2000) The distinctiveness principle: Identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 4(4):337–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang CA, Zhang XM, Hann I (2018) Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends' social influence in online product ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):641–655.Google Scholar
  • Ward T (2018) How much social media is too much? Forbes (June 8), https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomward/2018/06/08/how-much-social-media-is-too-much/.Google Scholar
  • Wikipedia. Gender differences in social network service use. Accessed March 1, 2018, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_differences_in_social_network_service_use.Google Scholar
  • Zhang J, Zuckerman EW, Obukhova E (2016) A lack of security or of cultural capital? Acculturative conservatism in the naming choices of early 20th-century US Jews. Soc. Forces 94(4):1509–1538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Wang C (2012) Network positions and contributions to online public goods: The case of Chinese Wikipedia. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(2):11–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zou X, Cai H (2016) Charting China’s rising individualism in names, songs, and attitudes. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March 11), https://hbr.org/2016/03/charting-chinas-rising-individualism-in-names-songs-and-attitudes.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.