Improving Text Analysis Using Sentence Conjunctions and Punctuation
Published Online:7 Jul 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1214
References
- (2007) A correlated topic model of science. Ann. Appl. Statist. 1(1):17–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3(January):993–1022.Google Scholar
- (2016) Sentence-based text analysis for customer reviews. Marketing Sci. 35(6):953–975.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty JD, Williams CKI, Culotta A, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 22 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 288–296.Google Scholar
- (1998) Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models. J. Econometrics 86(2):221–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Modeling dynamic effects in repeated-measures experiments involving preference/choice: An illustration involving stated preference analysis. Appl. Psych. Measurement 28(3):186–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) A dynamic changepoint model for new product sales forecasting. Marketing Sci. 23(1):50–65.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Topics in tweets: A user study of topic coherence metrics for twitter data. Eur. Conf. Inform. Retrieval (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 492–504.Google Scholar
- (2016) A cross-cohort changepoint model for customer-base analysis. Marketing Sci. 36(2):195–213.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Integrating topics and syntax. Saul LK, Weiss Y, Bottou L, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 17 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 537–544.Google Scholar
- (2017) Automated text analysis for consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 44(6):1274–1306.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. Preprint, submitted September 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9709008.Google Scholar
- (2006) Ordinal Data Modeling (Springer Science and Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
- (2014) Machine reading tea leaves: Automatically evaluating topic coherence and topic model quality. Proc. 14th Conf. Eur. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 530–539.Google Scholar
- (2007) Supervised topic models. Platt JC, Koller D, Singer Y, Roweis ST, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 20 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 121–128.Google Scholar
- (1987) A Linguistic Study of American Punctuation (Peter Lang, Bern, Switzerland).Google Scholar
- (2016) A novel measure for coherence in statistical topic models. 54th Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 543–548.Google Scholar
- (2002) Capturing term dependencies using a language model based on sentence trees. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (ACM, New York), 383–390.Google Scholar
- (2008) A hidden Markov model of customer relationship dynamics. Marketing Sci. 27(2):185–204.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Automatic evaluation of topic coherence. Human Language Tech.: 2010 Annual Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 100–108.Google Scholar
- (1996) Current approaches to punctuation in computational linguistics. Comput. Humanities 30(6):457–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Crumbs of the cookie: User profiling in customer-base analysis and behavioral targeting. Marketing Sci. 35(3):405–426.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Topic modeling: Beyond bag-of-words. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (ACM, New York), 977–984.Google Scholar

