Social Advertising Effectiveness Across Products: A Large-Scale Field Experiment

References

• Aral S (2011) Commentary-identifying social influence: A comment on opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):217–223.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2012) Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337(July):337–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell LS, Bernheim BD (1996) Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):349–373.Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Eckles D (2013) Uncertainty in online experiments with dependent data: An evaluation of bootstrap methods. Proc. 19th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1303–1311.Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Karrer B, Adamic LA (2009) Social influence and the diffusion of user created content. Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 325–334.Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Eckles D, Yan R, Rosenn I (2012) Social influence in social advertising: Evidence from field experiments. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, vol. 1 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 146–161.Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Google Scholar
• Bart Y, Stephen AT, Sarvary M (2014) Which products are best suited to mobile advertising? A field study of mobile display advertising effects on consumer attitudes and intentions. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):270–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden WO, Etzel MJ (1982) Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):183–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J (2014) Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J. Consumer. Psych. 24(4):586–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Milkman KL (2012) What makes online content viral? J. Marketing Res. 49(2):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Schwartz EM (2011) What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? J. Marketing Res. 48(5):869–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political. Econom. 102(5):841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond RM, Settle JE, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Fowler JH (2017) Social endorsement cues and political participation. Political Comm. 34(2):261–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer ADI, Marlow C, Settle JE, Fowler JH (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415):295–298.Google Scholar
• Bramoullé Y, Djebbari H, Fortin B (2009) Identification of peer effects through social networks. J. Econometrics 150(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D (2011) Goodbye Pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.Link, Google Scholar
• Burnkrant RE, Cousineau A (1975) Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior. J. Consumer Res. 2(3):206–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Chen Y (2009) Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):864–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron RC, Miller DL (2015) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J. Human Resources 50(2):317–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic vs. systematic information processing and the use of source vs. message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):752–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1987) The heuristic model of persuasion. Zanna MP, Olson JM, Herman CP, eds. Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 5 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 3–39.Google Scholar
• Christakis N, Fowler J (2013) Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statist. Medicine 32(4):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colicev A, Malshe A, Pauwels K, O’Connor P (2017) Improving consumer mind-set metrics and shareholder value through social media: The different roles of owned and earned. J. Marketing 82(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corneo G, Jeanne O (1997) Conspicuous consumption, snobbism and conformism. J. Public Econom. 66(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M, Gerard HB (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnormal Psych. 51(3):629–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding P, VanderWeele TJ (2016) Sensitivity analysis without assumptions. Epidemiology 27(3):368–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman HH, Friedman L (1979) Endorser effectiveness by product type. J. Advertising Res. 19(5):63–71.Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Libai B, Muller E (2001) Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Lett. 12(3):211–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Han S, Lehmann DR, Hong JW (2009) The role of hubs in the adoption process. J. Marketing 73(2):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanssens DM, Weitz BA (1980) The effectiveness of industrial print advertisements across product categories. J. Marketing Res. 17(3):294–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hass R (1981) Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. Petty R, Ostrom TM, Brock TC, eds. Congitive Responses in Persuasion (Psychology Press, London), 141–172.Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Van den Bulte C (2014) Nonmonotonic status effects in new product adoption. Marketing Sci. 33(4):509–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang S (2016) Social influence in public and private behaviors. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems), 1–16.Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Lee JY (2015) Social contagion in new product trial and repeat. Marketing Sci. 34(3):408–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2008) Social and Economic Networks, vol. 3 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Jacoby J, Kaplan LB (1972) The components of perceived risk. Proc. 3rd Annual Conf. Assoc. Consumer Res. (Association for Consumer Research, Chicago), 382–393.Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Lewis RA, Nubbemeyer E (2017) The online display ad effectiveness funnel & carryover: Lessons from 432 field experiments. Preprint, submitted October 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2701578.Google Scholar
• Jones JJ, Bond RM, Bakshy E, Eckles D, Fowler JH (2017) Social influence and political mobilization: Further evidence from a randomized experiment in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. PLoS One 12(4):e0173851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Xie Y (2012) Competition in a status goods market. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):609–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulviwat S, Bruner GC, Al-Shuridah O (2009) The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption. J. Bus. Res. 62(7):706–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakens D, Scheel AM, Isager PM (2018) Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Adv. Methods Practices Psych. Sci. 1(2):259–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Arriaga M (2014) Distinction and status production on user-generated content platforms: Using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural production to understand social dynamics in online fields. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):468–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X (2018) Impact of average rating on social media endorsement: The moderating role of rating dispersion and discount threshold. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):739–754.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin S, Zhang J, Hauser JR (2015) Learning from experience, simply. Marketing Sci. 34(1):1–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovett MJ, Peres R, Shachar R (2013) On brands and word of mouth. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):427–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: a randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Cass A, McEwen H (2004) Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. J. Consumer Behav. 4(1):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer W (1995) Design innovation and fashion cycles. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):771–792.Google Scholar
• Peters K, Chen Y, Kaplan AM, Ognibeni B, Pauwels K (2013) Social media metrics—A framework and guidelines for managing social media. J. Interactive Marketing 27(4):281–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1990) Comment: Neyman (1923) and causal inference in experiments and observational studies. Statist. Sci. 5(4):472–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2015) Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(3):203–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2016) Advertising spillovers: Evidence from online field experiments and implications for returns on advertising. J. Marketing Res. 53(4):459–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1978) A model of advertising and product quality. J. Political Econom. 86(3):485–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Galak J (2012) The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: A study of a microlending marketplace. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Toubia O (2010) Deriving value from social commerce networks. J. Marketing Res. 47(2):215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Bakshy E, Aral S (2013) Selection effects in online sharing: Consequences for peer adoption. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 821–836.Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Bakshy E, Eckles D, Aral S (2015) Heterogeneous social influence from personalized social cues. MIT Sloan Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth vs. traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. J. Marketing 73(5):90–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2008) Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. 54(12):2024–2038.Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker CE (2016) Social advertising: How advertising that explicitly promotes social influence can backfire. Preprint, submitted June 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1975897.Google Scholar
• Turner JC (1991) Social Influence (Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne M, Brynjolfsson E (2005) Global village or cyber-Balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Sci. 51(6):851–868.Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C (2000) New product diffusion acceleration: Measurement and analysis. Marketing Sci. 19(4):366–380.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL (2001) Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion vs. marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1409–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Stremersch S (2004) Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. 23(4):530–544.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Wuyts S (2007) Social Networks and Marketing (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Veblen T (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Classes: An Economic Study of Institutions (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Griskevicius V (2014) Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women. J. Consumer Res. 40(February):834–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang R, Neville J, Rogati M (2010) Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 981–990.Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar