Entry of Platforms into Complementary Hardware Access Product Markets

References

• Abhishek V, Jerath K, Zhang ZJ (2016) Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Management Sci. 62(8):2259–2280.Link, Google Scholar
• Arkolakis C, Costinot A, Rodriguez-Clare A (2012) New trade models, same old gains? Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):94–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1972) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton University Press Palgrave, London), 219–236.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1972) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. Rowley CK, ed. Readings in Industrial Economics (Palgrave, London), 219–236.Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Khosla I, Sinha KK (1998) Quality and competition. Management Sci. 44(9):1179–1192.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner J (2019) Google Fiber: A timeline of the good, the bad & the ugly. Accessed March 29, 2020, https://www.lightreading.com/services/broadband-services/google-fiber-a-timeline-of-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-/a/d-id/749461.Google Scholar
• Caminal R, Claici A (2007) Are loyalty-rewarding pricing schemes anti-competitive? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 25(4):657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang R (2009) Is Verizon’s $23 billion bet with Fios paying off? Accessed March 28, 2020, https://adage.com/article/news/verizon-s-23-billion-bet-fios-paying/136688.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Riordan MH (2007) Price and variety in the spokes model. Econom. J. (London) 117(522):897–921.Google Scholar
• Davidson J (2015) Google Fiber has internet providers scrambling to improve their service. Accessed July 14, 2019, http://money.com/money/3820109/google-fiber-has-internet-providers-scrambling-to-improve-their-service/.Google Scholar
• Economides N (1999) Quality choice and vertical integration. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(6):903–914.Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Marshall VA (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filloux F (2019) The ARPUs of the big four dwarf everybody else. Accessed March 29, 2020, https://mondaynote.com/the-arpus-of-the-big-four-dwarf-everybody-else-e5b02a579ed3.Google Scholar
• Gabbert E (2017) 2013 Q1 Google earnings call reveals real reason for Google Fiber? Accessed February 3, 2018, https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2013/04/18/q1-google-earnings-call-google-fiber.Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Gordon BR (2011) Does AMD spur Intel to innovate more? J. Political Econom. 119(6):1141–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha A, Long X, Nasiry J (2016) Quality in supply chain encroachment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(2):280–298.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Multi-sided platforms. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 43(C):162–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin B, Downes L (2018) Why Google Fiber is high-speed internet’s most successful failure. Accessed June 3, 2019, https://hbr.org/2018/09/why-google-fiber-is-high-speed-internets-most-successful-failure.Google Scholar
• Ma CTA, Burgess JF (1993) Quality competition, welfare, and regulation. J. Econom. 58(2):153–173.Google Scholar
• McCann J (2018) Google Pixel review. Accessed March 2, 2020, https://www.techradar.com/reviews/google-pixel-review.Google Scholar
• Perloff JM, Salop SC (1985) Equilibrium with product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 52(1):107–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulz N, Stahl K (1996) Do consumers search for the highest price? Oligopoly equilibrium and monopoly optimum in differentiated-products markets. RAND J. Econom. 27(3):542–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
• Swider M (2017) Moto Z review. Accessed March 2, 2020, https://www.techradar.com/reviews/phones/mobile-phones/moto-z-1323027/review.Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Turk V (2017) Facebook banks on virtual reality as the future of socialising. Accessed January 21, 2018, https://www.newscientist.com/article/2128391-facebook-banks-on-virtual-reality-as-the-future-of-socialising/.Google Scholar
• Vives X (2008) Innovation and competitive pressure. J. Indust. Econom. 56(3):419–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolinsky A (1997) Regulation of duopoly: Managed competition vs regulated monopolies. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(4):821–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yalcin T, Ofek E, Koenigsberg O, Biyalogorsky E (2013) Complementary goods: Creating, capturing, and competing for value. Marketing Sci. 32(4):554–569.Link, Google Scholar