No Substitute for the Real Thing: The Importance of In-Context Field Experiments in Fundraising

References

• Adena M, Huck S (2017) Matching donations without crowding out? Some theoretical considerations, a field, and a laboratory experiment. J. Public Econom. 148(April):32–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcott H (2015) Site selection bias in program evaluation. Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1117–1165.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1988) Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism. J. Public Econom. 35(1):57–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Payne AA (2013) Charitable giving. Auerbach A, Chetty R, Feldstein M, Saez E, eds. Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 5, (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1–50.Google Scholar
• Anik L, Norton MI, Ariely D (2014) Contingent match incentives increase donations. J. Marketing Res. 51(6):790–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker RJ, Walker JM, Williams AW (2009) Matching contributions and the voluntary provision of a pure public good: Experimental evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 70(1):122–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartels DM, Hastie R, Urminsky O (2018) Connecting laboratory and field research in judgment and decision making: Causality and the breadth of external validity. J. Appl. Res. Memory Cognition 7(1):11–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartels DM, Kvaran T, Nichols S (2013) Selfless giving. Cognition 129(2):392–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekkers R (2015) When and why matches are more effective subsidies than rebates. Replication in Experimental Economics (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 183–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal M, Kalambokidis L, Turk A (2012) Subsidizing charitable contributions with a match instead of a deduction: What happens to donations and compliance? Natl. Tax J. 65(1):91–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crumpler H, Grossman PJ (2008) An experimental test of warm glow giving. J. Public Econom. 92(5–6):1011–1021.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis DD, Millner EL, Reilly RJ (2005) Subsidy schemes and charitable contributions: a closer look. Experiment. Econom. 8(2):85–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes RM, Corrigan B (1974) Linear models in decision making. Psych. Bull. 81(2):95–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE (1989) Clinical vs. actuarial judgment. Science 243(4899):1668–1674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pope D (2017) What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):1029–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dove KE (2000) Conducting a Successful Capital Campaign: The New, Revised, and Expanded Edition of the Leading Guide to Planning and Implementing a Capital Campaign (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Luo X, Fang Z (2017) Self-signaling and prosocial behavior: A cause marketing mobile field experiment. Marketing Sci. 36(2):161–186.Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2003) Rebate vs. matching: Does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter? J. Public Econom. 87(3):681–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman PJ (2017) Comparing rebate and matching subsidies controlling for donors’ awareness: Evidence from the field. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 66(February):88–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Escalas JE, Bettman JR (2003) You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. J. Consumer Psych. 13(3):339–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feiler DC, Tost LP, Grant AM (2012) Mixed reasons, missed givings: The costs of blending egoistic and altruistic reasons in donation requests. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(6):1322–1328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons GJ, Lehmann DR (2004) Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Sci. 23(1):82–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goswami I, Urminsky O (2016a) When should the ask be a nudge? The effect of default amounts on charitable donations. J. Marketing Res. 53(5):829–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goswami I, Urminsky O (2016b) When and how fundraisers should suggest how much to donate. Harvard Bus. Rev. (December 29), https://hbr.org/2016/12/when-and-how-fundraisers-should-suggest-how-much-to-donate.Google Scholar
• Harbaugh WT (1998) The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):277–282.Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Lit. 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huck S, Rasul I (2011) Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Public Econom. 95(5):351–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huck S, Rasul I, Shephard A (2013) Comparing charitable fundraising schemes: Evidence from a natural field experiment and a structural model. American Econom. J. Econom. Policy. 7(2):326–369.Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2006) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 12338, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2012) How can Bill and Melinda Gates increase other people’s donations to fund public goods? NBER Working Paper No. 17954, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA, Shafir E (2011) Small matches and charitable giving: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Public Econom. 95(5):344–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landry CE, Lange A, List JA, Price MK, Rupp NG (2006) Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):747–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lange A, List JA, Price MK (2007) Using lotteries to finance public goods: Theory and experimental evidence. Internat. Econom. Rev. 48(3):901–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latané B, Williams K, Harkins S (1979) Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(6):822–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonhardt D (2008) What makes people give? New York Times (March 9), https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/magazine/09Psychology-t.html.Google Scholar
• List JA, Lucking-Reiley D (2002) The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. J. Political Econom. 110(1):215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Price MK (2009) The role of social connections in charitable fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 69(2):160–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Murphy JJ, Price MK, James AG (2019) Do appeals to donor benefits raise more money than appeals to recipient benefits? Evidence from a natural field experiment with Pick.Click.Give. NBER Working Paper No. 26559, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Martin R, Randal J (2009) How Sunday, price, and social norms influence donation behaviour. J. Socio-Econom. 38(5):722–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier S (2007) Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1203–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier S, Frey BS (2004) Matching donations: Subsidizing charitable giving in a field experiment. Zurich IEER Working Paper No. 181.Google Scholar
• Mislavsky R, Dietvorst BJ, Simonsohn U (2019) The minimum mean paradox: A mechanical explanation for apparent experiment aversion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(48):23883–23884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer D, Meyvis T, Davidenko N (2009) Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):867–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ribar DC, Wilhelm MO (2002) Altruistic and joy-of-giving motivations in charitable behavior. J. Political Econom. 110(2):425–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rondeau D, List JA (2008) Matching and challenge gifts to charity: Evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments. Experiment. Econom. 11(3):253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders M, Smith S, Norton MI (2013) Non-standard matches and charitable giving other. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 13–094, May 2013.Google Scholar
• Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. 119(540):1422–1439.Google Scholar
• Shen L, Hsee CK, Wu Q, Tsai CI (2012) Overpredicting and underprofiting in pricing decisions. J. Behav. Decision Making 25(5):512–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2010) Disentangling the sources of pro-socially motivated effort: A field experiment. J. Public Econom. 94(11–12):1086–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang CY, Sussman AB (2018) Perspectives on mental accounting: An exploration of budgeting and investing. Financial Planning Rev. 1(1-2):e1011.Google Scholar