Slotting Fees and Price Discrimination in Retail Channels
References
- American Bar Association (2012) Antitrust Law Developments (Seventh). Section of Antitrust Law, American Bar Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (1997) Understanding cooperative advertising participation rates in conventional channels. J. Marketing Res. 34:357–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Slotting allowances and fees: Schools of thought and the views of practicing managers. J. Marketing 64:92–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Inference on vertical contracts between manufacturers and retailers allowing for nonlinear pricing and resale price maintenance. RAND J. Econom. 41:139–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Empirical evidence on the role of nonlinear wholesale pricing and vertical restraints on cost pass-through. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95:500–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Canadian Bureau of Competition (2002) The Abuse of Dominance Provisions (Sections 78 and 79 of the Competition Act) as Applied to the Canadian Grocery Sector. Report, Canadian Bureau of Competition, Ottawa, Canada, https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/office-consumer-affairs/en/consumer-interest-groups/consumer-trends/consumer-trends-report-chapter-9-consumer-spending-references.Google Scholar
- (1992) Demand signaling and screening in channels of distribution. Marketing Sci. 11:327–347.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Multiple messages to retailers: Signaling new product demand. Marketing Sci. 19:381–389.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Channel coordination when retailers compete. Marketing Sci. 14:360–377.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) Manufacturer-optimal wholesale pricing when retailers compete. Marketing Lett. 9:65–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Is channel coordination all it is cracked up to be? J. Retailing 76:511–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Coordinating channels under price and nonprice competition. Marketing Sci. 17:338–355.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 40:80–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. 2:239–272.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Manufacturer allowances and retailer pass-through rates in a competitive environment. Marketing Sci. 18:59–76.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Contract design with a dominant retailer and a competitive fringe. Management Sci. 59:2111–2116.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) All-units discounts in retail contracts. J. Econom. Management Strategy 13:429–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The effects of costs and competition on slotting allowances. Marketing Sci. 26:259–267.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Slotting allowances and new product introductions. Marketing Sci. 16:112–128.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) The strategic value of quantity forcing contracts. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2:204–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Upfront fees and exclusion in downstream markets. RAND J. Econom. 38:823–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) An economic theory of vertical restraints. RAND J. Econom. 15:27–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Buyer power and intrabrand coordination. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9:721–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Managing channel profits. [Comment] Marketing Sci. 6:375–379.Link, Google Scholar
- Norwegian Competition Authority (2005) Betaling for hylleplass [payment for shelf space]. Report 2/05, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
- (2005) Channel coordination in the presence of a dominant retailer. Marketing Sci. 24:254–262.Link, Google Scholar
- (1991) Slotting allowances and resale price maintenance: A comparison of facilitating practices. RAND J. Econom. 22:120–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Impact of Reverse-Fixed-fees on Competition. Report, Office of Fair Trading, London. Available at https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20140402165103/http:/oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/research/RVP.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1980) Market Structure and Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1950) Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 58:347–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Do slotting allowances enhance efficiency or hinder competition? J. Marketing Res. 43:137–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- United States Federal Trade Commission (2001) Report on the Federal Trade Commission workshop on slotting allowances and other marketing practices in the grocery industry. Report, U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/report-federal-trade-commission-workshop-slotting-allowances-and-other-marketing-practices-grocery/slottingallowancesreportfinal_0.pdf.Google Scholar
- United States Federal Trade Commission (2003) Slotting allowances in the retail grocery industry: Selected case studies in five product categories. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/use-slotting-allowances-retail-grocery-industry/slottingallowancerpt031114.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2007) Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74:625–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Marketing research and public policy: The case of slotting fees. J. Public Policy Marketing 21:275–288.Crossref, Google Scholar

