Frontiers: Polarized America: From Political Polarization to Preference Polarization

References

• Barberá P, Jost JT, Nagler J, Tucker JA, Bonneau R (2015) Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psych. Sci. 26(10):1531–1542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culotta A, Cutler J (2016) Mining brand perceptions from Twitter social networks. Marketing Sci. 35(3):343–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Cutright KM, Wu EC, Banfield JC, Kay AC, Fitzsimons GJ (2011) When your world must be defended: Choosing products to justify the system. J. Consumer Res. 38(1):62–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaPosta D, Shi Y, Macy M (2015) Why do liberals drink lattes? Amer. J. Sociol. 120(5):1473–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal D, Wilkie J (2010) Real men don’t eat quiche: Regulation of gender expressive choice in men. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 1(4):291–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao L, Wheeler SC, Shiv B (2009) The “shaken self”: Product choices as a means of restoring self-view confidence. J. Consumer Res. 36(1):29–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M (2016) Polarization in 2016. White paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. https://web.stanford.edu/˜gentzkow/research/PolarizationIn2016.pdf.Google Scholar
• Green E (2018) Politics as the new religion for progressive Democrats. Atlantic (October 11), https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/poll-shows-activism-highest-among-non-religious-democrats/572674/.Google Scholar
• Jung K, Garbarino E, Briley D, Wynhausen J (2017) Blue and red voices: Effects of political ideology on consumers’ complaining and disputing behavior. J. Consumer Res. 44(3):477–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan R, Misra K, Singh V (2013) Ideology and brand consumption. Psych. Sci. 24(3):326–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kidwell B, Farmer A, Hardesty DM (2013) Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. J. Consumer Res. 40(2):350–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Rucker DD (2012) Bracing for the psychological storm: Proactive vs. reactive compensatory consumption. J. Consumer Res. 39(4):815–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long JA, Eveland WP Jr, Slater MD (2018) Partisan media selectivity and partisan identity threat: The role of social and geographic context. Mass Comm. Soc. 22(2):145–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandel N, Rucker DD, Levav J, Galinsky AD (2017) The compensatory consumer behavior model: How self‐discrepancies drive consumer behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 27(1):133–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ordabayeva N (2019) Similar but unequal: Political polarization in the effects of perceived social similarity on support for redistribution. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 84(4):103811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roos JMT, Shachar R (2014) When Kerry met Sally: Politics and perceptions in the demand for movies. Management Sci. 60(7):1617–1631.Link, Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Galinsky A (2013) Compensatory consumption. Belk R, Ruvio A, eds. The Routledge Companion to Identity and Consumption (Routledge, New York), 207–215.Google Scholar
• Rustagi N, Shrum LJ (2019) Undermining the restorative potential of compensatory consumption: A product’s explicit identity connection impedes self-repair. J. Consumer Res. 46(1):119–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sibley CG, Osborne D, Duckitt J (2012) Personality and political orientation: Meta‐analysis and test of a threat‐constraint model. J. Res. Personality 46(6):664–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winterich KP, Zhang Y, Mittal V (2012) How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 29(4):346–354.Crossref, Google Scholar