Expert’s Recommendations in Product Choices: Information Provision, Conflicts of Interest, and Consumer Protection among U.S. Kidney Disease Patients

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0191

References

  • Anagol S, Cole S, Sarkar S (2017) Understanding the advice of commissions-motivated agents: Evidence from the Indian life insurance market. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckert W (2018) Choice in the presence of experts: The role of general practitioners in patients’ hospital choice. J. Health Econom. 60:98–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L, Blumenthal D, Chimonas SC, Cohen JJ, Goldman J, et al. (2006) Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: A policy proposal for academic medical centers. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 295(4):429–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Vanhonacker WR (1996) Limited choice sets, local price response, and implied measures of price competition. J. Marketing Res. 33(2):163–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charoenwong B, Kwan A, Umar T (2019) Does regulatory jurisdiction affect the quality of investment-adviser regulation? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3681–3712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Chen DL, Lewis G (2021) Mostly harmless machine learning: Learning optimal instruments in linear IV models. Preprint, submitted June 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06158.Google Scholar
  • Ching AT (2010) A dynamic oligopoly structural model for the prescription drug market after patent expiration. Internat. Econom. Rev. 51(4):1175–1207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching AT, Ishihara M (2012) Measuring the informative and persuasive roles of detailing on prescribing decisions. Management Sci. 58(7):1374–1387.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ching J, Brown M, Burian S, Chen F, Cionco R, Hanna A, Hultgren T, et al. (2009) National urban database and access portal tool. Bull. Amer. Meteorological Soc. 90(8):1157–1168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Claeskens G, Hjort NL (2008) Model Selection and Model Averaging (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Crawford GS, Shum M (2005) Uncertainty and learning in pharmaceutical demand. Econometrica 73(4):1137–1173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford GS, Griffith R, Iaria A (2021) A survey of preference estimation with unobserved choice set heterogeneity. J. Econometrics 222(1):4–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dulleck U, Kerschbamer R (2006) On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. J. Econom. Literature 44(1):5–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eliason PJ, Heebsh B, McDevitt RC, Roberts JW (2020) How acquisitions affect firm behavior and performance: Evidence from the dialysis industry. Quart. J. Econom. 135(1):221–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaynor M, Propper C, Seiler S (2016) Free to choose? Reform, choice, and consideration sets in the English National Health Service. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(11):3521–3557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree MS (2008) Limited information and advertising in the US personal computer industry. Econometrica 76(5):1017–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gowrisankaran G, Town RJ (1999) Estimating the quality of care in hospitals using instrumental variables. J. Health Econom. 18(6):747–767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo T, Sriram S, Manchanda P (2021) The effect of information disclosure on industry payments to physicians. J. Marketing Res. 58(1):115–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E, Hortaçsu A, Wildenbeest M (2019) Empirical search and consideration sets. Dubé J-P, Rossi PE, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Marketing, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 193–257.Google Scholar
  • Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2009) Misselling through agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):883–908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(430):773–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim TTI, KC D (2020a) Can Viagra advertising make more babies? Direct-to-consumer advertising on public health outcomes. J. Marketing Res. 57(4):599–616.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim TTI, KC D (2020b) The impact of hospital advertising on patient demand and health outcomes. Marketing Sci. 39(3):612–635.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim SM, Kim TT, Yoon TJ (2023) Does advertising matter to emergency patients? The effect of advertising on hospital choice, travel distances, and mortality rates. Preprint, submitted August 14, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5147807.Google Scholar
  • Liu Q, Gupta S (2011) The impact of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs on physician visits and drug requests: Empirical findings and public policy implications. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 28(3):205–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu J, Huang Z, Gilbertson DT, Foley RN, Collins AJ (2010) An improved comorbidity index for outcome analyses among dialysis patients. Kidney Internat. 77:141–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. 22(1):58–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Melanson TA, Gander JC, Rossi A, Adler JT, Patzer RE (2021) Variation in waitlisting rates at the dialysis facility level in the context of goals for improving kidney health in the United States. Kidney Internat. Rep. 6(7):1965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyers DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB, Mor V, Rahman M (2021) Higher Medicare Advantage star ratings are associated with improvements in patient outcomes: Study examines how Medicare quality ratings impact patient outcomes for those enrolled in Medicare Advantage. Health Affairs 40(2):243–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murry C, Zhou Y (2020) Consumer search and automobile dealer colocation. Management Sci. 66(5):1909–1934.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Desiraju R, Chintagunta PK (2004) Return on investment implications for pharmaceutical promotional expenditures: The role of marketing-mix interactions. J. Marketing 68(4):90–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ (2013) Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. New England J. Medicine 368(1):6–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Subramanian U, Wang Y (2018) Information sharing, advice provision, or delegation: What leads to higher trust and trustworthiness? Management Sci. 64(1):474–493.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prakash S, Coffin R, Schold J, Lewis SA, Gunzler D, Stark S, Howard M, Rodgers D, Einstadter D, Sehgal AR (2014) Travel distance and home dialysis rates in the United States. Peritoneal Dialysis Internat. 34(1):24–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raval D, Rosenbaum T, Wilson N (2016) Industrial reorganization: Learning about patient substitution patterns from natural experiments. Preprint, submitted May 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2784772.Google Scholar
  • Ryskina KL, Konetzka RT, Werner RM (2018) Association between 5-star nursing home report card ratings and potentially preventable hospitalizations. Inquiry 55:46958018787323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sakkas GK, Karatzaferi C (2012) Hemodialysis fatigue: Just “simple” fatigue or a syndrome on its own right? Frontiers Physiology 3:306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz J, Luce MF, Ariely D (2011) Are consumers too trusting? The effects of relationships with expert advisers. J. Marketing Res. 48:S163–S174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro BT (2020) Advertising in health insurance markets. Marketing Sci. 39(3):587–611.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simonson I, Drolet A (2004) Anchoring effects on consumers’ willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept. J. Consumer Res. 31(3):681–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tamara Konetzka R, Grabowski DC, Perraillon MC, Werner RM (2015) Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source. Health Affairs 34(5):819–827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terui N, Ban M, Allenby GM (2011) The effect of media advertising on brand consideration and choice. Marketing Sci. 30(1):74–91.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tuerhong G, Kim SB (2014) Gower distance-based multivariate control charts for a mixture of continuous and categorical variables. Expert Systems Appl. 41(4):1701–1707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Renal Data System (2023) 2023 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Report, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2023.Google Scholar
  • Velázquez AF, Thorsness R, Trivedi AN, Nguyen KH (2022) County-level dialysis facility supply and distance traveled to facilities among incident kidney failure patients. Kidney360 3(8):1367–1373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner DE, Meyer KB (2020) Home dialysis in the United States: To increase utilization, address disparities. Kidney Medicine 2(2):95–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoon TJ (2020) Quality information disclosure and patient reallocation in the healthcare industry: Evidence from cardiac surgery report cards. Marketing Sci. 39(3):636–662.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yoon TJ, Kim TT (2024) The role of advertising in high-tech medical procedures: Evidence from robotic surgeries. J. Marketing 88(1):97–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.