Choice Architecture, Privacy Valuations, and Selection Bias in Consumer Data

References

• Acemoglu D, Makhdoumi A, Malekian A, Ozdaglar A (2022) Too much data: Prices and inefficiencies in data markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 14(4):218–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John LK, Loewenstein G (2012) The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):160–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John LK, Loewenstein G (2013) What is privacy worth? J. Legal Stud. 42(2):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2019) Choice architecture, framing, and cascaded privacy choices. Management Sci. 65(5):2267–2290.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2006) Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Exp. Econom. 9(4):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aridor G, Jiménez Durán R, Levy R, Song L (2024) Experiments on social media. Preprint, submitted October 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4991773.Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2003) “coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):73–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrieta-Ibarra I, Goff L, Jiménez-Hernández D, Lanier J, Weyl EG (2018) Should we treat data as labor? Moving beyond ‘free’. AEA Papers Proc. 108:38–42.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Catalini C, Tucker C (2017) The digital privacy paradox: Small money, small costs, small talk. NBER Working Paper No. 23488, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S (2019) Generalized random forests. Ann. Statist. 47(2):1148–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Chernozhukov V, Hortaçsu A, Suzuki J (2019) The impact of big data on firm performance: An empirical investigation. AEA Papers Proc. 109:33–37.Google Scholar
• Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9(3):226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Bonatti A, Gan T (2022) The economics of social data. RAND J. Econom. 53(2):263–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattner L, Nelson S (2021) How costly is noise? Data and disparities in consumer credit. Preprint, submitted May 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07554.Google Scholar
• Bradley VC, Kuriwaki S, Isakov M, Sejdinovic D, Meng X-L, Flaxman S (2021) Unrepresentative big surveys significantly overestimated us vaccine uptake. Nature 600(7890):695–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao R, Koning RM, Nanda R (2021) Biased sampling of early users and the direction of startup innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 28882, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Chiou L, Tucker C (2017) Search engines and data retention: Implications for privacy and antitrust. NBER Working Paper No. 23815, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cochran WG, Mosteller F, Tukey JW (1954) Principles of sampling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 49(265):13–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collis A, Moehring A, Sen A, Acquisti A (2021) Information frictions and heterogeneity in valuations of personal data. Preprint, submitted November 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3974826.Google Scholar
• D’Assergio C, Manchanda P, Montaguti E, Valentini S (2022) The race for data: Gaming or being gamed by the system? Preprint, submitted October 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4250389.Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Misra S (2023) Personalized pricing and consumer welfare. J. Polit. Econ. 131(1):131–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2012) Shifts in privacy concerns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(3):349–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hils M, Woods DW, Böhme R (2020) Measuring the emergence of consent management on the web. Proc. ACM Internet Measurement Conf. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 317–332.Google Scholar
• Ichihashi S (2021) The economics of data externalities. J. Econom. Theory. 196:105316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Bellman S, Lohse GL (2002) Defaults, framing and privacy: Why opting in-opting out. Marketing Lett. 13(1):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson GA, Shriver S, Du S (2020) Consumer privacy choice in online advertising: Who opts out and at what cost to industry? Marketing Sci. 39(1):33–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1325–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korganbekova M, Zuber C (2023) Balancing user privacy and personalization. Work in progress, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Kummer M, Schulte P (2019) When private information settles the bill: Money and privacy in Google’s market for smartphone applications. Management Sci. 65(8):3470–3494.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Yang J, Anderson E (2024) Using grocery data for credit decisions. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print July 15, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02364.Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Yang J, Anderson ET (2025) Who benefits from alternative data for credit scoring? Evidence from Peru. Preprint, submitted February 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4852032.Google Scholar
• Lei X, Chen Y, Sen A (2024) Trade-offs in leveraging external data capabilities: Evidence from a field experiment in an online search market. Preprint, submitted December 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4452804.Google Scholar
• Lin T (2022) Valuing intrinsic and instrumental preferences for privacy. Marketing Sci. 41(4):663–681.Google Scholar
• Lin T, Misra S (2022) Frontiers: The identity fragmentation bias. Marketing Sci. 41(3):433–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Linos E (2018) More than public service: A field experiment on job advertisements and diversity in the police. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 28(1):67–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma MA, Gutiérrez DE, Frausto JM, Al-Delaimy WK (2021) Minority representation in clinical trials in the United States: Trends over the past 25 years. Mayo Clinic Proc., vol. 96 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 264–266.Google Scholar
• Markovich S, Yehezkel Y (2024) “For the public benefit”: Data policy in platform markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy 33:652–685.Google Scholar
• Martin K, Nissenbaum H (2017) Measuring privacy: An empirical test using context to expose confounding variables. Sci. Tech. Law Rev. 18(1).Google Scholar
• Miller KM, Skiera B (2024) Economic consequences of online tracking restrictions: Evidence from cookies. Internat. J. Res. Marketing. 41(2):241–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller KM, Sahni NS, Strulov-Shlain A (2023) Sophisticated consumers with inertia: Long-term implications from a large-scale field experiment. Preprint, submitted January 27, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4065098.Google Scholar
• Misra S (2023) Algorithmic nudges. mimeo, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Morel V, Santos C, Fredholm V, Thunberg A (2023) Legitimate interest is the new consent-large-scale measurement and legal compliance of IAB Europe TCF paywalls. Proc. 22nd Workshop Privacy Electronic Soc. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 153–158.Google Scholar
• Mrkva K, Posner NA, Reeck C, Johnson EJ (2021) Do nudges reduce disparities? Choice architecture compensates for low consumer knowledge. J. Marketing 85(4):67–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller-Tribbensee T, Miller KM, Skiera B (2024) Paying for privacy: Pay-or-tracking walls. Preprint, submitted March 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03610.Google Scholar
• Neumann N, Tucker CE, Kaplan L, Mislove A, Sapiezynski P (2024) Data deserts and black boxes: The impact of socio-economic status on consumer profiling. Management Sci. 70(11):8003–8029.Google Scholar
• Nouwens M, Liccardi I, Veale M, Karger D, Kagal L (2020) Dark patterns after the GDPR: Scraping consent pop-ups and demonstrating their influence. Proc. 2020 CHI Conf. Human Factors Computing Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–13.Google Scholar
• Peltzman S (1981) The effects of FTC advertising regulation. J. Law Econom. 24(3):403–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prince JT, Wallsten S (2022) How much is privacy worth around the world and across platforms? J. Econom. Management Strategy 31(4):841–861.Google Scholar
• Rafieian O, Yoganarasimhan H (2021) Targeting and privacy in mobile advertising. Marketing Sci. 40(2):193–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Rao A, Wang E (2017) Demand for “healthy” products: False claims and FTC regulation. J. Marketing Res. 54(6):968–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM (1996) The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. 15(4):321–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Semenova V, Chernozhukov V (2021) Debiased machine learning of conditional average treatment effects and other causal functions. Econom. J. 24(2):264–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stantcheva S (2023) How to run surveys: A guide to creating your own identifying variation and revealing the invisible. Annual Rev. Econom. 15:205–234.Google Scholar
• Strulov-Shlain A (2023) More than a penny's worth: Left-digit bias and firm pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2612–2645.Google Scholar
• Sun T, Yuan Z, Li C, Zhang K, Xu J (2023) The value of personal data in internet commerce: A high-stakes field experiment on data regulation policy. Management Sci. 70(4):2645–2660.Google Scholar
• Tang H (2019) The value of privacy: Evidence from online borrowers. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Tomaino G, Wertenbroch K, Walters DJ (2023) Intransitivity of consumer preferences for privacy. J. Marketing Res. 60(3):489–507.Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Ma L, Jamal Z (2016) Crumbs of the cookie: User profiling in customer-base analysis and behavioral targeting. Marketing Sci. 35(3):405–426.Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2023) Algorithmic exclusion: The fragility of algorithms to sparse and missing data. Brookings (Center on Regulation and Markets at Brookings, Washington, DC), 1–26.Google Scholar
• Utz C, Degeling M, Fahl S, Schaub F, Holz T (2019) (un) informed consent: Studying GDPR consent notices in the field. Proc. 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference Computer Communications Security (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 973–990.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt N, Tuchman A, Shapiro BT, Moakler R (2024) Estimating the value of offsite tracking data to advertisers: Evidence from meta. Marketing Sci. 44(2):268–286.Google Scholar
• Westin AF (2003) Social and political dimensions of privacy. J. Soc. Issues. 59(2):431–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams AR, Snoke J, Bowen CMK, Barrientos AF (2024) Disclosing economists’ privacy perspectives: A survey of American economic association members’ views on differential privacy and the usability of noise-infused data. Harvard Data Sci. Rev., ePub ahead of print August 21, https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.a8fb0371.Google Scholar
• Willis LE (2020) Deception by design. Harvard J. Law Tech. 34(1):115–190.Google Scholar
• Woodruff A, Pihur V, Consolvo S, Brandimarte L, Acquisti A (2014) Would a privacy fundamentalist sell their DNA for $1000… if nothing bad happened as a result? The Westin categories, behavioral intentions, and consequences. 10th Symposium Usable Privacy Security (SOUPS 2014) (USENIX Association, Menlo Park, CA), 1–18.Google Scholar