Choice Frictions in Large Assortments

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0415

References

  • Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2023) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abaluck J, Gruber J (2023) When less is more: Improving choices in health insurance markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(3):1011–1040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackerberg D, Rysman M (2005) Unobserved product differentiation in discrete-choice models: Estimating price elasticities and welfare effects. RAND J. Econom. 36(4):771–788.Google Scholar
  • Aguiar L, Waldfogel J, Waldfogel S (2021) Playlisting favorites: Measuring platform bias in the music industry. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 78:102765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almagro M, Domınguez-Iino T (2024) Location sorting and endogenous amenities: Evidence from Amsterdam. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Athey S, Ellison G (2011) Position auctions with consumer search. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1213–1270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry ST, Waldfogel J (1999) Free entry and social inefficiency in radio broadcasting. RAND J. Econom. 30(3):297–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Eizenberg A, Waldfogel J (2016) Optimal product variety in radio markets. RAND J. Econom. 47(3):463–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boatwright P, Nunes JC (2001) Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. J. Marketing 65(3):50–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonhomme S, Manresa E (2015) Grouped patterns of heterogeneity in panel data. Econometrica 83(3):1147–1184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonhomme S, Lamadon T, Manresa E (2022) Discretizing unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 90(2):625–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borle S, Boatwright P, Kadane JB, Nunes JC, Shmueli G (2005) The effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Sci. 24(4):545–648.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Briesch RA, Chintagunta PK, Fox EJ (2009) How does assortment affect grocery store choice? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):176–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broniarczyk SM, Hoyer WD, McAlister L (1998) Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. 35(2):166–176.Google Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ (2015) The provision of convenience and variety by the market. RAND J. Econom. 46(3):480–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown ZY, Jeon J (2024) Endogenous information and simplifying insurance choice. Econometrica 92(3):881–911.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2020) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Google Scholar
  • Caplin A, Dean M (2015) Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(7):2183–2203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R, Halaburda H (2014) When does a platform create value by limiting choice? J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):259–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chade H, Smith L (2006) Simultaneous search. Econometrica 74(5):1293–1307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandon P, Hutchinson JW, Bradlow ET, Young SH (2009) Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. J. Marketing 73(6):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A, Böckenholt U, Goodman J (2015) Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. J. Consumer Psych. 25(2):333–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chu J, Manchanda P (2016) Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Marketing Sci. 35(6):870–893.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De Chaisemartin C, d’Haultfoeuille X (2020) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2964–2996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dean M, Ravindran D, Stoye J (2023) A better test of choice overload. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 67(3):297–308.Google Scholar
  • Donnelly R, Kanodia A, Morozov I (2024) Welfare effects of personalized rankings. Marketing Sci. 43(1):92–113.Google Scholar
  • Draganska M, Jain DC (2005) Product-line length as a competitive tool. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drèze X, Hoch SJ, Purk ME (1994) Shelf management and space elasticity. J. Retailing 70(4):301–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisend M (2014) Shelf space elasticity: A meta-analysis. J. Retailing 90(2):168–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ershov D (2024) Variety-based congestion in online markets: Evidence from mobile apps. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 16(2):180–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farronato C, Fong J, Fradkin A (2024) Dog eat dog: Measuring network effects using a digital platform merger. Management Sci. 70(1):464–483.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fong J (2024) Effects of market size and competition in two-sided markets: Evidence from online dating. Marketing Sci. 43(5):971–985.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gu C, Wang Y (2022) Consumer online search with partially revealed information. Management Sci. 68(6):4215–4235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Halaburda H, Piskorski MJ, Yildirim PN (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econom. J. (London) 39(153):41–57.Google Scholar
  • Huang Y, Bronnenberg BJ (2023) Consumer transportation costs and the value of e-commerce: Evidence from the Dutch apparel industry. Marketing Sci. 42(5):984–1003.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(6):995–1006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joo J (2022) Rational inattention as an empirical framework: Application to the welfare effects of new product introduction. J. Marketing Res. 60(2):278–298.Google Scholar
  • Kamenica E (2008) Contextual inference in markets: On the informational content of product lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2127–2149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaye A (2024) The personalization paradox: Welfare effects of personalized recommendations in two-sided digital markets. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  • Kim Y (2021) Consumer retention under imperfect information. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster K (1990) The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Sci. 9(3):189–206.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Netessine S (2020) Higher market thickness reduces matching rate in online platforms: Evidence from a quasiexperiment. Management Sci. 66(1):271–289.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin X (2017) Disaggregate network effects on two-sided platforms. PhD thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Matêjka F, McKay A (2015) Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(1):272–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moraga-González JL, Sándor Z, Wildenbeest MR (2023a) Consumer search and prices in the automobile market. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(3):1394–1440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moraga-González JL, Sandor Z, Wildenbeest MR (2023b) A framework for the estimation of demand for differentiated products with simultaneous consumer search. Working paper, Tinebergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  • Nocke V, Rey P (2024) Consumer search, steering, and choice overload. J. Political Econom. 132(5):1684–1739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quan TW, Williams KR (2018) Product variety, across-market demand heterogeneity, and the value of online retail. RAND J. Econom. 49(4):877–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reshef O (2023) Smaller slices of a growing pie: The effects of entry in platform markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 15(4):183–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Romano JP, Shaikh AM (2012) On the uniform asymptotic validity of subsampling and the bootstrap. Ann. Statist. 40(6):2798–2822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM (2010) Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. Consumer Res. 37(3):409–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sims CA (2003) Implications of rational inattention. J. Monetary Econom. 50(3):665–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sloot LM, Fok D, Verhoef PC (2006) The short-and long-term impact of an assortment reduction on category sales. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):536–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun L, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econometrics 225(5):175–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.