A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.758

References

  • Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(2):191–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A. Reflections on self-efficacy. Adv. Behavioral Res. Therapy (1978) 1(4):237–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Amer. Psychologist (1982) 37(2):122–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bandura A., Sternberg R. J., Kolligian J. Reflection on nonability determinants of competence. Competence Considered: Perceptions of Competence and Incompetence across the Lifespan (1988) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands) 315–362Google Scholar
  • Bandura A., Cervone D. Differential engagement of self-reactive mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Process (1986) 38(1):92–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A., Schunk D. H. Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1981) 41(3):586–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barclay D., Higgins C., Thompson R. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Tech. Stud. (1995) 2(2):285–309Google Scholar
  • Barling J., Beattie R. Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. J. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1983) 5(1):41–51Google Scholar
  • Birkinshaw J., Morrison A., Hulland J. Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(8):637–655CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • British TelecomSurvey Item Bank (1984) (MCB University Press, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK) Google Scholar
  • Brown I., Inouyne D. K. Learned helplessness through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in competence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1978) 36(8):900–908CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R. Individual reactions to computing technology: A social cognitive theory perspective. (1992) . Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Davies T. F. Predicting application software usage: A longitudinal study. (1994) . Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G. Attitudes toward telecommuting: Implications for work-at-home programs. Inform. Management (1984) 7(3):133–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillman D. A.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method (1978) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Donaldson B.Sales Management: Theory and Practice (1990) (MacMillan Education Ltd, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Duxbury L., Haines G. Predicting alternative work arrangements from salient attitudes: A study of decision makers in the public sector. J. Bus. Res. (1991) 23(1):83–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duxbury L., Higgins C. A., Irving R. H. Attitudes of managers and employees to telecommuting. Inf (1987) 25(3):273–285Google Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frayne C. A., Latham G. P. Application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance. J. Appl. Psych. (1987) 72(3):387–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freedman D. H. Quick change artists. CIO (1993) 6(18):32–28Google Scholar
  • Fulk J., Flanagin A. J., Kalman M. E., Monge P., Ryan T. Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Comm. Theory (1966) 6(1):60–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber B. Virtual teams. Training (1995) 32(4):36–40Google Scholar
  • Gist M. E. The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel Psych. (1989) 42(4):787–805CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gist M. E., Mitchell T. R. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(2):183–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gist M. E., Schwoerer C., Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74(6):884–891CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green D. H., Barclay D. W., Ryans A. B. Entry strategy and long-term performance: Conceptualization and empirical examination. J. Marketing (1995) 59(4):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greengard S. Making the virtual office a reality. Personnel J. (1994) September):66–79Google Scholar
  • Handy C. Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) May–June):40–50Google Scholar
  • Hartman F., Guss C. Virtual teams—Constrained by technology or culture. Proc. IEMC 96. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence Comm., Comput. Energy Technologies (1996) IEEE, VancouverBC, Canada:645–650CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heinssen R. K., Glass C. R., Knight L. A. Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Comp. Human Behaviour (1987) 3(1):49–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins C., Duxbury L., Irving R. Work-family conflict in the dual-career family. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Process (1992) 51(1):51–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill T., Smith N. D., Mann M. F. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies. J. Appl. Psych. (1987) 72(2):307–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • House R. J., Schuler R. S., Levanoni E. Role conflict and ambiguity scales: Reality or artifacts? J. Appl. Psych. (1983) 68(2):334–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hulland J. S. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management J.ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Huws U. New technology homeworkers. Employment Gazette (1990) (UK)Google Scholar
  • Illingworth M. M. Virtual managers. Information Week (1994) June 13):42–58Google Scholar
  • Keen P. G. W. MIS research: Reference discipline and a cumulative tradition. Proc. First Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1980) December):9–18Google Scholar
  • Lee C., Bobko P. Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(3):364–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lent R. W., Brown S. D., Larkin K. C. Comparison of three theoretically derived variables in predicting career and academic behavior: Self-efficacy, interest congruence, and consequence thinking. J. Counseling Psych. (1987) 34(3):293–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E. A., Dunnette M. D. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1976) (John Wiley, New York) 1297–1349Google Scholar
  • Locke E. A. The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Process (1991) 50:288–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas H. C. The IT-based virtual organization. (1996) DecemberCleveland, Ohio:495–496Panel presented at the International Conference on Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas H. C., Baroudi J. The role of information technology in organization design. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 10(4):9–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowday R. T., Steers R. M., Porter L. W. The measurement of organizational commitment. J. Vocational Behavior (1979) 14:224–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowshowitz A. Virtual organizations: A vision of management in the information age. Inform. Soc. (1994) 10(4):267–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pedhazur E. J.Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research (1982) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Phelps N. Mountain bell: Program for managers. Office Workstations in the Home (1985) (National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Risman B. J., Tomaskovic-Devey D. The social construction of technology: Microcomputers and the organization of work. Bus. Horizons (1989) 32(3):71–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rizzo J., House R., Lirtzman S. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1970) 15(2):150–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roderick J. C., Jelley H. M. Managerial perceptions of telecommuting in two large metropolitan cities. Southwest J. Bus. Econom. (1991) 8(1):35–41Google Scholar
  • Saks A. M. Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. J. Appl. Psych. (1995) 80(2):211–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schunk D. H. Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. J. Ed. Psych. (1981) 73(1):93–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silver W. S., Mitchell T. R., Gist M. E. Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of selfefficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Process (1995) 62(3):286–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stanton W. J., Buskirk R. H.Management of the Sales Force (1987) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Staples D. S. An investigation of some key information technology-enabled remote management and remote work issues. Conf. Proc. Australasian Conf. Inform. Systems (1996) University of TasmaniaDecemberHobart:665–676Google Scholar
  • Staples D. S. The management of remote workers: An information technology perspective. (1997) . Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Stumpf S. A., Brief A. P., Hartman K. Self-efficacy expectations and coping with career-related events. J. Vocational Behavior (1987) 31(2):91–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor M. S., Locke E. A., Lee C., Gist M. E. Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms? Organ. Behavior Human Decision Process (1984) 34(3):402–418Google Scholar
  • Warr P., Cook J., Wall T. Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. J. Occupational Behavior (1979) 52(2):129–148Google Scholar
  • Weinberg R. S., Gould D., Jackson A. Expectations and performance: An empirical test of Bandura's self-efficacy theory. J. Sport Psych. (1979) 1(4):320–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wold H., Nijkamp P., Leitner L., Wrigley N. Systems analysis by partial least squares. Measuring the Unmeasurable (1985) (Marinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht) 221–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood R., Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(3):361–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.