Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community

References

• Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:425–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45:905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Dokko G., Rosenkopf L. Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Res. Policy (2003) 32:301–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J. Urban Econom. (1997) 42:422–448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Gambardella A. Complementarity and external linkages—The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Indust. Econom. (1990) 38:361–379Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D., Stephan P. Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86:641–652Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:40–57Link, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron A. C., Trivedi P. K.Regression Analysis of Count Data (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P. Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy (1994) 23:487–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P., David P., Feiwel G. R. Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology. Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory (1987) (New York University Press, New York) 519–542Google Scholar
• Davis G., Greve H. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociology (1997) 103:1–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Yoo M., Baker W. E. The small world of the American corporate elite, 1991–2001. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1:301–336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories—A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy (1982) 11:147–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Oran. Sci. (1996) 7:136–150Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry (1977) 40:35–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1:215–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fruchterman T., Reingold E. Graph drawing by force-directed replacement. Software—Practice and Experience (1991) 21:1129–1164Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G., Zahra S. H., Wood D. R. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. J. Bus. Venturing (2002) 17:577–609Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure—The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociology (1985) 91:481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guyon X.Random Fields on a Network (1995) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J., Schankenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:291–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. Patent citations and market value: A first look. (2000) . NBER Working Paper #7741Google Scholar
• Hausman J., Hall B. H., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52:909–938Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. Rand J. Econom. (1996) 27:32–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamada T., Kawai S.-. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inform. Processing Lett. (1989) 31:7–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99:483–499Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg Jaffe A. M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 63:577–598Google Scholar
• Lansing J. S.Priests and Programmers: Technologies of Power in the Engineered Landscape of Bali (1991) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: Toward a history friendly model. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11:667–703Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A.Industry and Trade (1920) (Macmillan, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S.The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Moody J., White D. R. Group cohesion, nesting, and embeddedness. Amer. Sociological Rev. (2003) 68:103–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F. Innovation as the co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Res. Policy (2002) 31:1389–1403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. Assessing private enterprise: An exegesis of tangled doctrine. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12:93–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. Institutions supporting technical advance in industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:186–189Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Res. Policy (1990) 19:193–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J. From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1081–1104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J., Riccaboni M., Pammolli F., Powell W. W. A comparison of U.S. and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Sci. (2002) 48:24–43Link, Google Scholar
• Palmer T. C. Building on biotech with lab space tight, developer banks on sector's future. Boston Globe (2002) C1(6/20/02)Google Scholar
• Piore M., Sabel C.The Second Industrial Divide (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Podolny J. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociology (2001) 107:33–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behavior (1990) 12:295–336Google Scholar
• Powell W. W. Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. J. Institutional Theoretical Econom. (1996) 152:197–215Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Brantley P., Nohira N., Eccles R. G. Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks. Networks in Organizations (1992) (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Koput K., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganization collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:116–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Bowie J., Smith-Doerr L. The spatial clustering of science and capital. J. Regional Stud. (2002) 36:291–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., White D. R., Koput K. W., Owen-Smith J. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociology (2004) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Pratt S. E.Pratt's Guide to Venture Capital Sources: 1998 (1998) (Securities Data Publishing)Google Scholar
• Romer P. M. Increasing returns and long run growth. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94:1002–1037Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Scarborough V. L., Schoenfelder J. W., Lansing J. S. Early statecraft on Bali: The water temple complex and the decentralization of the political economy. Res. Econom. Anthropology (1999) 20:299–330Google Scholar
• Shan W., Walker G., Kogut B. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:387–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. Network position and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:668–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:791–811Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Sorenson O. The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Res. Policy (2003) 32:229–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1996) 61:674–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W. J. Social capital, structural holes, and the formation of an industry network. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:109–125Link, Google Scholar
• White H. C. Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Sociology (1981) 87:517–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• White H. C.Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models of Production (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G., Darby M. Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. National Acad. Sci. (1996) 93:12709–12716Crossref, Google Scholar