Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066

References

  • Bird F., Waters J. The moral muteness of managers. California Management Rev. (1989) 32(1):73–88Google Scholar
  • Collins J. C.Good to Great (2001) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Collins J. C., Porras J. I.Built to Last (1994) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Donaldson T., Preston L. The stakeholder theory of the corporation—Concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(1):65–91Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E. The politics of stakeholder theory. Bus. Ethics Quart. (1994) 4(4):409–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman R. E., Evan W. Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. J. Behavioral Econom. (1990) 19(4):337–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman R. E., Phillips R. Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Bus. Ethics Quart. (2002) 12(3):331–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George B.Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets of Creating Lasting Value (2003) (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hayek F. A.The Road to Serfdom (1944) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Inkpen A., Hitt M. A., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. Strategic alliances. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (2001) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K) 409–432Google Scholar
  • Jones T., Wicks A. Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(2):206–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones T., Wicks A., Freeman R. E., Bowie N. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics (2002) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K) 19–37Google Scholar
  • McCloskey D.The Rhetoric of Economics (1998) (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) Google Scholar
  • Meyers Marshall W., Gupta V., Cummings L. L., Staw B. The performance paradox. Research in Organization Behavior (1994) 16(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 204–269Google Scholar
  • Phillips R., Freeman R. E., Wicks A. What stakeholder theory is not. Bus. Ethics Quart. (2003) 13(4):479–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rawls John. A Theory of Justice (1971) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundaram A., Inkpen A. The corporate objective revisited. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):350–363LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkataraman S., Freeman R. E., Venkataraman S. Stakeholder value equilibration and the entrepreneurial process. The Ruffin Series No. 3: Ethics and Entrepreneurship (2002) (Philosophy Documentation Center, Charlottesville, VA) 45–57Google Scholar
  • Werhane P.Moral Imagination in Management Decision Making (1998) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Wicks A., Freeman R. E. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):123–140LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.