Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change

References

• Argyris C. Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21:363–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armenakis A. A., Harris S. G., Mossholder K. W. Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations (1993) 46(6):681–703Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker W.Achieving Success through Social Capital (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Baker W., Cross R., Wooten M., Cameron K., Dutton J., Quinn R. Positive organizational network analysis and energizing relationships. Positive Organizational Scholarship (2003) (Berret-Koehler, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:78–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(1):41–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P.Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P.The Logic of Practice (1990) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. Understanding knowledge transformation in product development: Making knowledge manifest through boundary objects. (1997) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Carlile P. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Carnall C. A. Toward a theory for the evaluation of organizational change. Human Relations (1986) 31(3):745–766Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das T. K., Teng B. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. J. Management (2000) 26(1):31–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton J., Heaphy E., Cameron K., Dutton J., Quinn R. Coming to life: The power of high quality connections at work. Positive Organizational Scholarship (2003) (Berret-Koehler, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Dutton J., Lillius J., Kanov J., Cooperrider D., Fry R., Perderit S. The transformative potential of compassion at work. New Designs for Transformative Cooperation(Stanford University Press). ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:136–150Link, Google Scholar
• Ezzamel Mahmoud, Hugh Willmott. Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(2):358–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman Martha S.Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman Martha S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman Martha S., Pentland B. Re-theorizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Rappa M. A. A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of coclear implants. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):344–362Link, Google Scholar
• Geertz C.The Interpretation of Cultures (1973) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Giddens A.Central Problems in Social Theory (1979) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology (1973) 78:1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Homophilly and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:422–447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M.The Change Masters (1983) (Simon and Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Katz Daniel, Kahn Robert L.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1966) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Knights D., McCabe D. When “life is but a dream”: Obliterating politics through business process reengineering? Human Relations (1998) 51(6):761–798Google Scholar
• Kotter J. P. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 75(March/April):59–67Google Scholar
• Latour Bruno. Aramis or the Love of Technology (1996) (Harvard University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Lave Jean. Cognition in Practice (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leana Carrie R., Van Buren III Harry J. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):538–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leblebici H., Salancik G. R., Copay A., King T. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(3):333–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Light P. C.Sustaining Innovation (1998) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• March J. G. Footnotes to organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:563–577Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):63–92Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Ortner S. B. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Stud. Soc. Hist. (1984) 26(1):126–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ortner S. B.High Religion: A Cultural and Political History of Sherpa Buddhism (1989) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J.Organizations and Organization Theory (1982) (Pitman Publishing Inc., Marshfield, MA) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Piderit S. K. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(4):783–794Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranson S., Hinings B., Greenwood R. The structuring of organizational structures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riley P. A structurationist account of political cultures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:414–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein E. How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room. Sloan Management Rev. (1993) Winter):85–92Google Scholar
• Schon D.The Reflective Practitioner (1983) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Sewell W. A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. Amer. J. Sociology (1992) 98(1):1–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson James D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Trist E. A., Bamforth K. W., Pugh D. S. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Organization Theory (1984/1951) 2nd ed.(Penguin, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H., Chia R. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):567–582Link, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Poole M. S. Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):510–540Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wamsley Gary, Meyer Zald.The Political Economy of Public Organizations: A Critique and Approach to the Study of Public Administration (1976) (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) 2nd ed.(Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. Amer. Psych. (1984) 39(1):40–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Quinn R. E. Organizational change and development. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50:361–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westly F. The eye of the needle: Cultural and personal transformation in a traditional organization. Human Relations (1990) 43(3):273–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilmott H. Studying managerial work: A critique and a proposal. J. Management Stud. (1987) 24(3):249–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zald Mayer N. Political economy: A framework for comparative analysis. Power in Organizations (1970) (Vanderbilt University Press, TN) 221–269Google Scholar