The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0076

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regressions: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Amabile T. M., Schatzel E. A., Moneta G. B., Kramer S. J. Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quart.ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., Herron M. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1154–1184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C.Reasoning, Learning, and Action: Individual and Organizational (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Argyris C.Knowledge for Action: Changing the Status Quo (1990) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Argyris C. Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994) 74(4):77–85Google Scholar
  • Ashford S., Northcraft G. Conveying more (or less) than we realize: The role of impression-management in feedback-seeking. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1992) 53(3):310–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashford S., Rothbard N., Piderit S., Dutton J. Out on a limb: The role of context and impressions management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:23–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carver C., White T. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 67:319–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciborra C. The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):103–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delery J. E., Doty H. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):802–835CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detert J. R. To speak or not to speak: The multi-level influences on voice and silence in organizations. (2003) . Unpublished dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Doty H., Glick W., Huber G. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dweck C. S. Motivational processes affecting learning. Amer. Psychologist (1986) 41(10):1040–1048CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dweck C. S., Leggett E. L. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95(2):256–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Learning from errors is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1996) 32(1):5–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group level perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(2):128–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40(6):1419–1452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Mogelof P., Thompson L., Choi H. Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams. Creativity and Innovation in Organizations(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press, Mahwah, NJ) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S. T., Morling B., Stevens L. E. Controlling self and others: A theory of anxiety, mental control, and social control. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1996) 22(2):115–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J., Zhou J. Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: The role of context and clarity of feelings. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(4):687–697CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Organizing work to support relational coordination. Internat. Human Resource Management (2000) 11(3Google Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Group influences on individuals in organizations. Handbook of Indust. Organ. Psych. (1992) 3(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 199–267Google Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R.Work Redesign (1980) (Addision-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Inchiowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. The Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
  • Jones K. R., DeBaca V., Yarbrough M. Organizational culture assessment before and after implementing patient-focused care. Nursing Econom. (1997) 15(2):73–80Google Scholar
  • Keltner D., Gruenfeld D. H., Anderson C. Power, approach and inhibition. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110(2):265–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konner M.Becoming a Doctor: A Journey of Initiation in Medical School (1987) (Viking, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lee F. When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1997) 72(3):336–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee F. The fear factor. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(1):29–30Google Scholar
  • Lee F. The social costs of seeking help. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (2002) 38(1):17–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee F., Tiedens L. Is it lonely at the top? Independence and interdependence of power-holders. B. Staw, R. Sutton, eds. Res. Organ. Behavior (2001) 23:43–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee F., Teich J. M., Spurr C. D., Bates D. W. Implementation of physician order entry: User satisfaction and usage patterns. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. (1996) 3(1):42–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee M., Ofshe R. The impact of behavioral style and status characteristics on social influence: A test of two competing theories. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1981) 44(2):73–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J. S., Keltner D. Fear, anger, and risk. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81:146–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J. S., Tetlock P. E. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125:255–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacDuffie J. P. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1995) 48(2):197–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masserman J. H., Kimmel H. D. The principle of uncertainty in neurotigenesis. Experimental Psychopathology: Recent Research and Theory (1971) (U.S. Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 13–32Google Scholar
  • Meyer A., Tsui A., Hinings C. Configuration approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1175–1195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michael D. N.On Learning to Plan and Planning to Learn (1976) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Morrison E. W. Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):557–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muraven M., Baumeister R. F. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psych. Bull. (2000) 126(2):247–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter L. W., Allen R. W., Angle H. L. The politics of upward influence in organizations. Res. Organ. Behavior (1981) 3:109–149Google Scholar
  • Quirk G. J., Armony J. L., LeDoux J. E. Fear conditioning enhances different temporal components of tone-evoked spike trains in auditory cortex and lateral amygdala. Neuron (1997) 19(3):613–624CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L.Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1992) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schein E. H. The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organ. Dynamics (1983) 12(1):34–48Google Scholar
  • Schein E. H.Organizational Culture and Leadership (1985) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Schminke M. Consequences of power in a simulated job: Understanding the turnover decision. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1993) 23(1):52–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Senge P. M., Ross R., Smith B., Roberts C., Kleiner A.The Fifth Discipline Field Book: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization (1993) (Doubleday Currency, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Res. Organ. Behavior (1992) 14:231–266Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer G. M. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:483–504CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(4):501–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S. Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. (1998) 44(6):743–762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S. Enlightened experimentation: The new imperative for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(2):66–75Google Scholar
  • Thomke S.Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Thomke S., Nimgade A.Bank of America (A) and (B). (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) . Harvard Business School Cases 603-022 and 603-023Google Scholar
  • Thomke S., von Hippel E., Franke R. Modes of experimentation: An innovation process—and competitive—variable. Res. Policy (1998) 27:315–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiedens L., Ellsworth P., Mesquita B. Stereotypes about sentiments and status: Emotional expectations for high- and low-status group members. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2000) 26(5):560–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vincente W.What Engineers Know and How They Know It (1990) (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
  • Wolfe R., Lennox R., Cutler B. Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 50(2):356–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajonc R. B. Social facilitation. Science (1965) 149:269–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.