Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis

References

• Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. M. Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80:40–47Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Goodman P. S., Lawrence B. S., Tushman M. L. Time: A new research lens. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26:645–663Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schön D. A.Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Bierly P., Chakrabarti A. Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):123–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bierly P., Daly P. S. Exploration and exploitation in small manufacturing firms. 61th Annual Meeting Acad. Management (2001) (Washington, D.C). (August 3–8)Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:239–262Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:325–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker. G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T.The Demography of Corporations and Industries (2000) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Y. T., Van de Ven A. H. Learning the innovation journey: Order out of chaos. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:593–614Link, Google Scholar
• Corporate Handbook A definitive guide to listed companies on KLSE main board. (2000) (CEIC Holdings Ltd., Singapore) . 1999, 1998, 1997Google Scholar
• Corporate Handbook A definitive guide to listed companies on KLSE second board. (2000) (CEIC Holdings Ltd., Singapore) . 1999, 1998, 1997Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall) Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R.Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (1994) (New York, Free Press) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Highlights of Companies on the Stock Exchange of Singapore (1995–1999) . CBRD, National University of Singapore, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Ghemawat P., Ricart i Costa J. E. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(Winter):59–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. H. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1984) 49:149–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson A. D. Firm strategy and age dependence: A contingent view of the liabilities of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:281–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmqvist M. Experiential learning processes of exploration and exploitation within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:70–81Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:1183–1194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott A. M., Bontis N., Choo C. W. Exploration and exploitation as complements. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge: A Collection of Readings (2002) (Oxford University Press, New York) 339–358Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43:934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Long c. P., Carroll T. N. The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:535–550Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:118–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W., Singh K. Death of the lethargic: Effects of expansion into new technical subfields on performance in a firm's base business. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:152–180Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Toyama R. A firm as a dialectical being: Towards a dynamic theory of a firm. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11:995–1009Crossref, Google Scholar
• OECDScience, Technology and Industry Outlook 1996 (1996) (OCED, Paris, France) Google Scholar
• OECD-EUROSTATProposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Oslo Manual (1997) 2nd ed(OECD, Paris, France) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peter T. Get innovative or get dead. California Management Rev. (1990) 33:9–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. H. Towards a metatheory of innovation process. 49th Annual Meeting Acad. Management (1989) (Washington, D.C). (August 13–16)Google Scholar
• Radner R. A behavioral model of cost reduction. Bell J. Econom. (1975) 6:196–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singapore 1000 (1997) . 1998, 1999, 2000. Report: Previous year performance. DP Information Network Pte. Ltd., SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Singapore SME 500 (1997) . 1998, 1999, 2000. Report: Previous year performance. DP Information Network Pte. Ltd., SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Skinner W. The shareholder's delight: Companies that achieve competitive advantage from process innovation. Internat. J. Tech. Management (1992) 7:41–48Google Scholar
• Sutton J. Gibrat's legacy. J. Econom. Literature (1997) 35:40–59Google Scholar
• Timmons J.New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century (1999) 5th ed(Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38:8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W., de Boer M. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:551–568Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:423–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:730–743Link, Google Scholar
• Wong P. K. Globalization of American, European and Japanese production networks and the growth of Singapore's electronics industry. Internat. J. Tech. Management (2002) 24(7/8):843–869Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Das S. R. Innovation strategy and financial performance in manufacturing companies: An empirical analysis. Production Oper. Management (1993) 2:15–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zairi M.Competitive Benchmarking: An Executive Guide (1992) (Technical Communications (Publishing) Ltd., Letchworth, U.K) Google Scholar