Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0116

References

  • Aghion P., Tirole J. Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. (1997) 105:1–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P., Meyer A., Eisenhardt K. M., Carley K., Pettigrew A. Applications of complexity theory to organization science. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:233–236LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ansoff H. I.Strategic Management (1979) (MacMillan Press Ltd., London, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R. M., Cohen M. D.Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier (1999) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bartlett C. A., Goshal S.Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (1989) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bolton P., Dewatripont M. The firm as a communication network. Quart. J. Econom. (1994) 109:809–839CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. J., Eisenhardt K. M. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. (1988) 34:816–835LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bower J. L.Managing the Resource Allocation Process (1970) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Obel B.Designing Efficient Organizations: Modelling and Experimentation (1984) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Obel B. The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (1995) 1:57–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Obel B.Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit (2004) 3rd ed.(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. M., Svoboda D. M. Modeling organizational adaptation as a simulated annealing process. Sociological Methods Res. (1996) 25:138–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Child J.Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice (1984) 2nd ed.(Harper & Row, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17:1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Where are the theories for the “new” organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:i–ivGoogle Scholar
  • D’Aveni R.Hypercompetition (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Davidow W. H., Malone M. S.The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation of the 21st Century (1992) (HarperBusiness, New York) Google Scholar
  • Denison D. R., Hart S. L., Kahn J. A. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:1005–1023CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson L.The Contingency Theory of Organizations (2001) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drucker P. F. The coming of the new organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1988) 66(1):45–53Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Bourgeois L. J. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:737–770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fenton E. M., Pettigrew A. M., Pettigrew A. M., Fenton E. M. Theoretical perspectives on new forms of organizing. The Innovating Organization (2000) (Sage, London, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson J., Mitchell T. Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27:399–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Garicano L. Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econom. (2000) 108:874–904CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoshal S., Bartlett C. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:603–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould R. M., Dutta S., Manzoni J.-F. Revolution at Oticon A/S: The spaghetti organization. Process Re-engineering, Organisational Change and Performance Improvement (1999) (McGraw-Hill, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:1052–1081CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gresov C., Drazin R. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organizational design. Acad. Management J. (1997) 22:403–428Google Scholar
  • Hamel G., Prahalad C. K.Competing for the Future (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Handy C. Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(3):40–50Google Scholar
  • Harris M., Raviv A. Organization design. Management Sci. (2002) 48:852–865LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10:134–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khandwalla P. N.The Design of Organizations (1977) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York) Google Scholar
  • Langlois R. N. Modularity in technology and organization. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2002) 49:19–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43:934–950LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Z., Carley K. M. Organizational response: The cost performance tradeoff. Management Sci. (1997) 43:217–234LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Marengo L., Dosi G., Legrenzi P., Pasquali C. The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organizations. Indust. Corporate Change (2000) 9:757–788CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C., Mathews J. A., Miles G., Coleman H. J. Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form. Acad. Management Executive (1997) 11:7–24Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P. R., Roberts J. Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. (1995) 19:179–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Friesen P. H.Organizations: A Quantum View (1984) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. Strategy making in three modes. California Management Rev. (1973) 16:44–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L.Competing by Design (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nohria N., Eccles R. G.Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Perrone V., Clark T. The coevolution of contexts and structures: The N-form. Advancement in Organisational Behaviour: Essays in Honour of Derek S. Pugh (1997) (Ashgate, Hants, England) Google Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M., Whittington R., Melin L., Sanchez-Runde C., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Ruigrok W., Numagami T.Innovative Forms of Organizing (2003) (Sage, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Porter M. E. What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(6):61–78Google Scholar
  • Radner R. The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica (1993) 61:1109–1146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46:824–844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W. Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:274–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Organizational sticking points on NK-landscapes. Complexity (2002) 7(5):31–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49:290–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sabel C., Herrigel G., Kazis R., Dee R. How to keep mature industries innovative. Tech. Rev. (1987) 90:27–35Google Scholar
  • Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):63–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Senge P. M.The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (1990) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N. Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:838–857CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N. Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:125–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:650–669LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. (1962) 106:467–482Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Nadler D. A. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3:613–624Google Scholar
  • von Bertalanffy L.General Systems Theory (1968) (Braziller, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weber M.Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1922) (J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Whittington R., Pettigrew A., Peck S., Fenton E., Conyon M. Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:583–600LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Woodward J.Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.