Designing Work Within and Between Organizations

References

• Anderson P. Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(3):216–232Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow K.Information and Economic Behavior (1973) (Federation of Swedish Industries, Stockholm, Sweden) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur M. B., Rousseau D. M.The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baba M. L., Gluesing J., Ratner H., Wagner K. H. The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. J. Organ. Behavior (2004) 25:1–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75:84–93Google Scholar
• Baligh H. H., Burton R. M., Obel B. Organizational consultant: Creating a useable theory for organizational design. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12):1648–1662Link, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Kunda G. Bringing work back in. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):76–95Link, Google Scholar
• Barnett W. P., Sorenson O. The Red Queen in organizational creation and development. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(2):289–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney M. Macro, meso, micro: Six Sigma. Soc. Indust. Organ. Psych. (2002a) 39(4). http://siop.org/tip/backissues/TIPApr02/15barney.htmGoogle Scholar
• Barney M. Motorola’s second generation. Six Sigma Forum Magazine (2002b) 1(3):13–16Google Scholar
• Bartlett C. A., Ghoshal S.Transational Management (1995) 2nd ed.(Irwin, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V., Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. Organizational hierarchies and evolutionary processes: Some reflections on a theory of organizational evolution. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 3–20Google Scholar
• Becker B., Gerhart B. The impact of human resource management on organization performance: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):779–801Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown C. Hewlett-Packard cuts more jobs. The Columbian (1999) May 27):A1Google Scholar
• Bruhn J. G.Trust and the Health of Organizations (2001) (Kluwer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London) Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (2005) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2:429–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Lewin A. Y., Seiford L. W.Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications (1994) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J. Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance—Part II., A contingency analysis. J. Management Stud. (1975) 12:12–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J.Organizations: A Guide to Problems and Practice (1977) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Child J.Organizations: Contemporary Principles and Practices (2005) (Basil Blackwell, London) Google Scholar
• Chilingerian J. A. Investigating non-medical factors associated with the technical efficiency of physicians in the provisions of hospital services: A pilot study. Acad. Management Proc. (1989) 85–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Commons J. R.The Economics of Collective Action (1950) (MacMillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Cooper W. W., Sieford L. M., Tone K.Data Envelopment Analysis (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Cooper W. W., Sinha K. K., Sullivan R. S. Evaluating the information content of a measure of plant output: An application to high technology manufacturing. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996) 68:329–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the economic performance. ACM Comput. Surveys (2003) 35(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte Research (2003) . On the cusp of a revolution: How offshoring will transform the financial services industry. http://www.dc.com/Insights/research/financial/offshoring.aspGoogle Scholar
• Denis J. L., Langley A., Rouleau L. Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. (2004) . Working paper, University of Montreal, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson L.The Contingency Theory of Organizations (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dooley K. J., Van de Ven A. H. Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(3):358–372Link, Google Scholar
• Dossani R., Kenney M. Went for cost, stayed for quality? Moving the back office to India. (2003) (Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Doty H. D., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:1196–1250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):612–631Link, Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:514–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J., Bielefeld W.Nonprofit Organizations in an Age of Uncertainty: A Study of Organization Change (1998) (Walter deGruyter, New York) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Designing the Innovating Organization (1982) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociology (1985) 91:481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gresov C., Drazin R. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):403–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gresov C., Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. Task uncertainty, unit design and morale. Organ. Stud. (1989) 10(1):45–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groshen E. L., Potter S. Has structural change contributed to a jobless recovery? Current Issues Econom. Finance (2003) 9(8):1–7Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):85–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Lawrence P. R., Puranam P. Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(5):415–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psych. (1975) 60(2):159–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herriot P., Anderson N., Anderson N., Herriot P. Selecting for change: How will personnel and selection psychology survive? International Handbook of Selection and Assessment (1997) (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York) Google Scholar
• House R., Rosseau D. M., Thomas-Hunt M. The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behavior (1995) 17:71–114Google Scholar
• Huang X., Sinha K. K., Dong Y. Complementarities between in-store and supply chain technologies: An empirical analysis of food retailing operations. (2004) . Working paper, Operations and Management Science Department, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
• Johnson P. E., Veazie P. V., Kochevar L., O’Connor P. J., Potthoff S. J., Verma D., Dutta P. Understanding variations in chronic disease outcomes. Health Care Management Sci. (2002) 5:175–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S.The Origins of Order (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S.At Home in the Universe (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ketchen D. J., Combs J. G., Russel C. J., Shook C. Organizational configurations and performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(1):223–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khandwalla P. The effect of competition on the structure of top management control. Acad. Management J. (1973) 16(2):285–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M., Tsai W.Social Networks and Organizations (2003) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corportation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1993) 24:625–645Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12(1):1–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., Warglien M. Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(3):342–357Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Minton J. W. Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management Sci. (1986) 32:514–538Link, Google Scholar
• Luthje B., Dutton W. A. IT and the changing social division of labor: The case of electronic contract manufacturing. Transforming Enterprise: The Economic and Social Technology (2004) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Mackenzie K. D. Processes and their frameworks. Management Sci. (2000) 46(1):110–125Link, Google Scholar
• Magretta J. The power of virtual integration: An interview with Dell Computer’s Michael Dell. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) March–April):73–84Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• McEvily B., Perrone V., Zaheer A. Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):91–103Link, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B. Quasi-natural organization science. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(4):352–380Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:1175–1195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R., Snow C.Organization Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Complementarities and fit—Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Account. Econom. (1995) 19:179–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):159–178Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Some organizational consequences of CEO succession. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:644–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations (1983) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Murtha T. P., Lenway S. A., Hart J. A.Managing New Industry Creation: Global Knowledge Formation and Entrepreneurship in High Technology (2001) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L. The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organ. Dynamics (1999) 45–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Info. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):63–92Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G. G., Anderson E. G. From buyer to integrator: The transformation of the supply-chain manager in the vertically disintegrated firm. Production Oper. Management (2002) 11(1):75–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pascale R. T., Athos A. G.The Art of Japanese Management (1981) (Warner Books, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearce J. L.Organization and Management in the Embrace of Government (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennings J. M. The relevance of the structural contingency mode of organizational effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20:393–410Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland P. Conceptualizing and measuring variety in the execution of organizational work processes. Management Sci. (2003a) 49(7):857–870Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland P. Sequential variety in work processes. Organ. Sci. (2003b) 14(5):528–540Link, Google Scholar
• Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1967) 32(April):194–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. H., Dooley K., Holmes M. E.Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(6):61–78Google Scholar
• Powell W. Neither markets nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behavior (1990) 12:295–336Google Scholar
• Quinn J. B.Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry (1992) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Quinn J. B. Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth. Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 41(4):13–29Google Scholar
• Quinn J. B., Baruch J. J., Zien K. A.Innovation Explosion: Using Intellect and Software to Revolutionize Growth Strategies (1997) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ring P., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 19(1):90–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46:824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):274–293Link, Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. Issues of level in organization research. Res. Organ. Behavior (1985) 7:1–35Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. The use of modular organizational forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1149–1168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven C. B. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:349–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven C. B., Romanelli E.The Entrepreneurship Dynamic (2001) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Schreft S. L., Singh A. A closer look at jobless recoveries. Econom. Rev. (2003) Second Quarter):45–73Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas CityGoogle Scholar
• Shaver M., Flyer F. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(12):1175–1193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):838–857Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. (2002a) 48(7):900–916Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002b) 47:125–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Sinha K. K. Moving frontier analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis for competitive analysis of a high technology manufacturing plant. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996) 66:197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis E.Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Trist E. L., Van de Ven A. H., Joyce W. F. The sociotechnical perspective. Perspectives on Organizational Behavior (1981) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Drazin R., Staw G., Cummings L. The concept of fit in contingency theory. Res. Organ. Behavior (1985) 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 333–365Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Ferry D. L.Measuring and Assessing Organizations (1980) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Ring P. S., Bachmann R., Zaheer A. Relying on trust in cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Handbook of Trust Research (2005) (Basil Blackwell, London, UK) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Polley D., Garud R., Venkataraman S.The Innovation Journey (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Verma D., Sinha K. K. Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. J. Oper. Management (2002) 20(5):451–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S. C., Clark K. B.Revolutionizing Product Development (1992) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Whittington R., Pettigrew A., Pettigrew A. M., Whittington R., Melin L., Sanchez-Runde C., van den Bosch F., Ruigrok W., Mumagami T. Complementarities, change, and performance. Innovative Forms of Organizing (2003) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
• Whittington R., Pettigrew A., Peck S., Fenton E., Conyon M. Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):583–600Link, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E., Smelser N. J., Swedberg R. Transactions cost economics and organization theory. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Wright S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, cross-breeding and selection of evolution. Proc. XI Internat. Congress Genetics (1932) 1:356–366Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., Harris J., Shenkar O., Reuer J. Interorganizational trust for inclusion. Handbook of Strategic Alliances (2005) (Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar