Building Organization Theory from First Principles: The Self-Enhancement Motive and Understanding Power and Influence

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0132

References

  • Barsade Sigal G., Ward Andrew J., Turner Jean D. F., Sonnenfeld Jeffrey A. To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:802–805CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister Roy E., Heatherton Todd F., Tice Dianne M. When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure: Negative consequences of high self-esteem. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1993) 64:141–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bazerman Max H. Conducting influential research: The need for prescriptive implications. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30:25–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein Michael. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bernstein William M., Stephan Walter G., Davis Mark H. Explaining attributions for achievement: A path analytic approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1979) 65:198–204Google Scholar
  • Berscheid Ellen, Walster Elaine H.Interpersonal Attraction (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bethune Gordon. From Worst to First (1998) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Billig Michael, Tajfel Henri. Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1973) 3:27–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blaine Bruce, Crocker Jennifer, Baumeister R. F. Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reaction to positive and negative events: An integrative review. Self-Esteem: The Puzzle of Low Self-Regard (1993) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 55–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau Peter M. A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1970) 35:201–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bobocel D. Ramona, Meyer John P. Escalating commitment to a failing course of action: Separating the role of choice and justification. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:360–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley Gifford W. Self serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1978) 36:56–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer Marilyn B. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. (1979) 86:307–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer Marilyn B., Kramer Roderick M. The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1985) 36:219–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner Joel, Houser Robert, Birnbaum Gregg. Escalation of commitment to an ineffective course of action: The effect of feedback having negative implications for self-identity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:109–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown Jonathan D. Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Soc. Cognition (1986) 4:353–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burger Jerry M., Messian Nicole, Patel Shebani, Prado Alicia del, Anderson Carmen. What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2004) 30:35–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byrne David. The Attraction Paradigm (1971) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Byron Christopher M.The Fanciest Dive (1986) (W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Campbell Keith W., Sedikides Constantine. Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Rev. General Psych. (1999) 3:23–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caro Richard A.The Path to Power: The Years of Lyndon Johnson (1982) (Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
  • Carver Charles S., Scheier Michael F.On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (1998) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chase William G., Simon Herbert A. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psych. (1973) 4:55–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini Robert B.Influence: Science and Practice (2001) 4th ed.(Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cialdini Robert B., Richardson K. D. Two indirect tactics of image management: Basking and blasting. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1980) 39:406–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini Robert B., Borden Richard J., Thorne Avril, Walker Marcus R., Freeman Steven, Sloan Lloyd R. Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 34:366–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clore Gerald L., Byrne Donn A., Huston T. L. A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction (1974) (Academic Press, New York) 143–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Comer Ronald, Laird James D. Choosing to suffer as a consequence of expecting to suffer: Why do people do it? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1975) 32:92–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crocker Jennifer. The costs of seeking self-esteem. J. Soc. Issues (2002) 3:597–615CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis Gerald F., Marquis Christopher. Prospects for organization theory in the early 21st century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):332–343LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Groot A. D.Thought and Choice in Chess (1965) (The Hague, Mouton, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Dunning David, Meyerowitz Judith A., Holzberg Amy D. Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57:1082–1090CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles Jacquelynne S., Wigfield Allan. In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy related beliefs. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:215–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher Roger, Ury William. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (1983) (Penguin Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fiske Susan T.Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology (2004) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gabor Andrea. The Man Who Discovered Quality (1990) (Times Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ghoshal Sumantra. Bad management theories are destroying good management practice. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. (2005) 4:75–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoshal Sumantra, Moran Peter. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:13–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gitell Jody H. Paradox of coordination and control. California Management Rev. (2000) 42:1–17Google Scholar
  • Goethals George R., Messick David M., Allison Scott T., Suls Jerry, Ashby Thomas. The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison. Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research (1991) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 149–176Google Scholar
  • Granovetter Mark. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology (1973) 78:1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halberstam David. The Reckoning (1986) (William Morrow, New York) Google Scholar
  • Haslam S. Alexander. Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach (2000) (Sage, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Hastorf Albert, Schneider David, Polefka Judith. Person Perception (1970) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Heath Chip. On the social psychology of agency relationships: Lay theories of motivation overemphasize extrinsic incentives. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Process (1999) 78:25–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heider Fritz. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (1958) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heine Steven J., Lehman Darrin R. Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1997a) 23:389–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heine Steven J., Lehman Darrin R. The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1997b) 72:1268–1283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heine Steven J., Lehman Darrin R., Markus Hazel R., Kitayama Shinobu. Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psych. Rev (1999) 106:766–794CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heracleous Loizos, Murray John. The urge to merge in the pharmaceutical industry. Eur. Management J. (2001) 19:430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra Herminia. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structures and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:422–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra Herminia, Kilduff Martin, Tsai Wenpin. Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):359–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Isaacson Walter. Kissinger: A Biography (1992) (Simon and Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
  • James William. The Principles of Psychology (1907) 1(Holt, New York) Google Scholar
  • John Oliver P., Robins Richard W. Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 66:206–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter Rosabeth M.Men and Women of the Corporation (1977) (Basic, New York) Google Scholar
  • Keltner Dacher, Gruenfeld Deborah H., Anderson Cameron. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110:265–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenrick Douglas T., Neuberg Steven L., Cialdini Robert B.Social Psychology: Unraveling the Mystery (2002) (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kramer Roderick M., Newton Elizabeth, Pommerenke Pamela L. Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment: Effects of self-esteem and mood. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Process (1993) 56:110–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krueger Jennifer. Enhancement bias in descriptions of self and others. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1998) 24:505–516CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kruger Justin, Dunning David. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 77:1121–1134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Ziva. The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. (1990) 108:480–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Ziva, Santioso Rasyid. Motivated changes in the self-concept. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1989) 25:272–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langer Ellen J.The Psychology of Control (1983) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Lawrence Paul R., Nohria Nitin. Driven: How Human Nature Shapes Our Choices (2002) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Levine David I., Tyson Laura D., Blinder A. S. Participation, productivity, and the firm’s environment. Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence (1990) (Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.) 183–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis Amy C., Sherman Steven J. Hiring you makes me look bad: Social-identity based reversals of the ingroup favoritism effect. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Process (2003) 90:262–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis Reginald F., Walker Blair S., Price Hugh B.Why Should White Guys Have All the Fun? How Reginald Lewis Created a Billion-Dollar Business Empire (1994) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lewisohn Peter M., Mischel Walter, Chaplin William, Baron Russell. Social competence and depression: The role of illusory self-perceptions. J. Abnormal Psych. (1980) 89:203–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipman-Blumen Jean. The Allure of Toxic Leaders: Why We Follow Destructive Bosses and Corrupt Politicians—And How We Can Survive Them (2004) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Marques Jose M., Abrams Dominic, Serodio Rui G. Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81:436–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire William J., Lindzey G., Aronson E. Attitudes and attitude change. The Handbook of Social Psychology (1985) 3rd ed.(Random House, New York) 233–346Google Scholar
  • Miller Dale T. Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1977) 34:901–906CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller Dale T., Ross Michael. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psych. Bull. (1975) 82:213–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mone Mark A., McKinley William. The uniqueness value and its consequences for organization studies. J. Management Inquiry (1993) 2:284–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore William L., Pfeffer Jeffrey. The relationship between departmental power and faculty careers on two campuses: The case for structural effects on faculty salaries. Res. Higher Ed. (1980) 13:291–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris Michael W., Peng Kaipeng. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 67:949–971CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth Charlan J., Moscovici S., Mucchi-Faina A. The value of minority dissent. Minority Influence (1994) (Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, IL) 3–15Google Scholar
  • Nemeth Charlan J., Kwan Julianne L. Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1987) 17:788–799CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ng Sik H. Equity theory and the allocation of rewards between groups. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1981) 11:439–443Google Scholar
  • O’Reilly Charles A., Caldwell Diane F., Barnett William P. Work group demography, social integration and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:21–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peli Gabor L., Polos Lazlos, Hannan Michael. Back to inertia: Theoretical implications of alternative styles of logical formalization. Soc. Theory (2000) 18:195–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer Jeffrey. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:599–620CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer Jeffrey. New Directions for Organization Theory (1997) (Oxford, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer Jeffrey, Cialdini Robert B., Kramer Roderick M., Neale Margaret A. Illusions of influence. Power and Influence in Organizations (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer Jeffrey, Konrad Alison M. The effects of individual power on earnings. Work Occupations (1991) 18:385–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer Jeffrey, Cialdini Robert B., Hanna Benjamin, Knopoff Kathleen. Faith in supervision and the self-enhancement bias: Two psychological reasons why managers don’t empower workers. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. (1998) 20:313–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny Joel M., Baron James N. Resources and relationships: Social networks, mobility, and satisfaction in the workplace. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1997) 62:673–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer Jeffrey T., Kramer Roderick M., Neale Margaret A. Positive illusions about oneself and one’s group: Antecedents and consequences. Small Group Res. (1997) 28:243–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose Frank. West of Eden: The End of Innocence at Apple Computer (1989) (Penguin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ross Michael, Sicoly Fiore. Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1980) 37:322–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rynes Sara L., Trank Christine Q., Lawson Anne M., Ilies Remus. Behavioral coursework in business education: Growing evidence of a legitimacy crisis. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. (2003) 2:269–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik Gerald R., Staw Barry M., Salancik Gerald R. Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. New Directions in Organizational Behavior (1977) (St. Clair Press, Chicago, IL) 1–54Google Scholar
  • Scott W. Richard. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1998) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sedikides Constantine, Green Jeffrey D. On the self-protective nature of inconsistency negativity management: Using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000a) 79:906–922CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sedikides Constantine, Green Jeffrey D., Bless Herbert, Forgas Joseph P. The rocky road from affect to attentional focus. The Message Within: The Role of Subjective Experience in Social Cognition and Behavior (2000b) (Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA) 203–215Google Scholar
  • Sedikides Constantine, Herbst Kenneth C., Hardin Deletha P., Dardis Gregory J. Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 83:592–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherif Muzafer, Harvey O. J., Jack White B., Hood William R., Sherif Carolyn W.Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robber’s Cave Experiment (1961) (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK) Google Scholar
  • Staw Barry M. Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1976) 16:27–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele Claude M., Liu Thomas J. Making the dissonance act unreflective of the self: Dissonance avoidance and the expectancy of a value affirming response. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1981) 45:5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swann William B. The trouble with change: Self-verification and allegiance to the self. Psych. Sci. (1997) 8:177–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel Henri, Turner John C., Worchel Stephen, Austin William G. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Behavior (1986) (Nelson-Hall, Chicago, IL) 7–24Google Scholar
  • Taylor Shelley E., Armor David A. Positive illusions and coping with adversity. J. Personality (1996) 64:873–989CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor Shelley E., Brown Jonathan D. Illusion and well-being: A psychological perspective on mental health. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:193–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor Shelley E., Lerner Jennifer S., Sherman David K., Sage Rebecca M., McDowell Nina K. Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2003) 84:165–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tesser Abraham, Berkowitz L. Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1988) 21(Academic Press, New York) 181–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiedens Larissa Z., Fragale Alison R. Power moves: Complimentarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2003) 84:558–568CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsui Anne S., Egan Terri D., O’Reilly Charles A. Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:549–579CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsui Anne S., Egan Terri D., Xin Katherine R., Chemers Martin, Costanzo Mark, Oskamp Stuart. Diversity in organizations: Lessons from demography research. Diversity in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 191–219Google Scholar
  • Useem Michael, Karabel Jerome. Pathways to top corporate management. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1986) 51:184–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward G., Keltner Dacher. Power and the consumption of resources. (1998) . Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  • Williams Katherine Y., O’Reilly Charles A., Staw Barry M., Sutton Robert I. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 77–140Google Scholar
  • Wills Thomas A. Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psych. Bull. (1981) 90:245–271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood Joanne V., Taylor Katherine L., Suls Jerry, Wills Thomas A. Serving self-relevant goals through social comparison. Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research (1991) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 23–41Google Scholar
  • Zammuto Ray F., Connolly Terry. Coping with disciplinary fragmentation. Organ. Behavior Teaching Rev. (1984) 9:30–37Google Scholar
  • Zenger Todd R., Lawrence Barbara S. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:353–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.