Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams

References

• Abernathy W., Clark K. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy (1985) 14:3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine E. Flexibility vs. efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota product system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:43–68Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R., Helfat C. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2002) 24(10):1011–1025Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H.Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M.Creativity in Context (1996) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Nadler D. A. Top hats and executive tales: Designing the senior team. Sloan Management Rev. (1989) 31(1):19–28Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Tushman M. Organizational environments and industry exit: The effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10(3):675–711Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schoen D. A.Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Audia P. G., Locke E. A., Smith K. G. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(5):837–853Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bantel K. A., Jackson S. E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:107–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard C.The Functions of the Executive (1968) 2nd ed.(Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bazerman M.Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (1998) 4th ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Bazerman M., Watkins M.Predictable Surprises: The Disasters You Should Have Seen and How to Prevent Them (2004) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Benner M., Tushman M. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:676–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(4):458–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M., Sondak H. Why some teams emphasize learning more than others: Evidence from business unit management teams. Toward Phenomenology of Groups and Group Membership (2002) 4(Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK) 49–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(3):552–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron K., Quinn R., Quinn R., Cameron K. Organizational paradox and transformation. Paradox and Transformation (1988) (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA) 1–18Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H. Graceful exits and missed opportunities. Bus. Hist. Rev. (2002) 76:803–837Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C.The Innovator’s Dilemma (1997) 2nd ed.(HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
• Collins J., Porras J.Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (1997) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Daft K. Weick. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:284–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Aveni W.Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Denison D., Hooijberg R., Quinn R. Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:524–540Link, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M.The Resolution of Conflict (1973) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy (1982) 11:147–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J., Ashford S. Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(3):397–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Jackson S. E. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):76–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(4):350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A., Roberto M. A., Watkins M. D. A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams. Leadership Quart. (2003) 14(3):297–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Westcott B., Quinn R., Cameron K. Paradoxical demands and the creation of excellence: The case of just-in-time manufacturing. Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management (1988) (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA) 169–194Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Zbaracki M. J. Strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:17–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Kahwajy J. L., Bourgeois L. J. I. Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Rev. (1997) 39(2):42–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely R. J., Thomas D. A. Cultural diversity at work: The moderating effects of work group perspectives on diversity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:229–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L.A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957) (Row Peterson, Evanston, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S., Hambrick D.Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (1996) (West Publishing Company, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN) Google Scholar
• Flynn F., Chatman J., Cooper C., Cartwright S., Earley C. Strong cultures and innovation: Oxymoron and opportunity? International Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate (2001) (J. Wiley, Chichester, England) 263–287Google Scholar
• Follett M. P., Graham P. Constructive conflict. Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management (1925/1996) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Ford J., Backoff R., Quinn R., Cameron K. Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. Paradox and Transformation. (1988) (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA) 81–121Google Scholar
• Frankel V. Paradoxical intention. Amer. J. Psychotherapy (1960) 14:520–535Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon H., Tushman M. L., Smith W., Anderson P. A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1103–1122Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R.Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D., Staw B. M., Cummings L. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Research in Organizational Behavior (1994) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 171–214Google Scholar
• Hannan M., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociology Rev. (1984) 49(2):149–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z.-L., Wong P.-K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):481–494Link, Google Scholar
• Heenan D., Bennis W.Co-Leaders: The Power of Great Partnership (1999) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Heider F.The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemp P., Stewart T. Leading change when business is good: An interview with Sam Palmisano. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(12):60–71Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Clark K. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 35:9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huff A. S.Mapping Strategic Thought (1990) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, NY) Google Scholar
• Huff A. S. A current and future agenda for cognitive research in organizations. J. Management Stud. (1997) 34(6):947–952Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S. Framing contests: Strategy making during a technological discontinuity. (2003) (Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan S., Murray A., Henderson R. Discontinuities and senior management: Assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):203–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley H. H.Attribution in Social Interaction (1971) (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kerr S. On the folly of rewarding A., while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. (1975) 18(4):769–782Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer E.Mindfulness (1989) (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Latham G. P., Locke E. A.Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique That Works (1995) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Lax D. A., Sebenius J. K.The Manager As Negotiator (1986) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Leana C. R., Barry B. Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 25(4):753–761Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. A. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:111–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., March J. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis M. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(4):760–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linehan M. M.Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorders (1993) (Guilford Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Lorsch J. W., Tierney T. J.Aligning the Stars (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. Misery loves company: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):268–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGinn K. L., Thompson L., Bazerman M. H. Dyadic processes of disclosure and reciprocity in bargaining with communication. J. Behavioral Decision Making (2003) 16(1):17–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Milliken F. J., Lant T. K. The effect of an organization’s recent performance history on strategic persistence and change: The role of managerial interpretations. Adv. Strategic Management (1996) 7:129–156Google Scholar
• Murnighan J. K., Conlon D. The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:165–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler D., Tushman M., Nadler D. Designing organizations that have good fit. Organizational Architecture (1992) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Nadler D., Tushman M.Competing By Design (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Nemeth C. J., Wachtler J. Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1983) 13:45–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noda T., Bower J. Strategy making as integrated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:169–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Toyama R. A firm as a dialectical being: Towards a dynamic theory of a firm. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(5):995–1009Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paine L. S.Value Shift: Why Companies Must Merge Social and Financial Imperatives to Achieve Superior Performance (2003) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Perlow L., Gittell J. H., Katz N. Conceptualizing patterns of work group interactions. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):520–536Link, Google Scholar
• Pinkley R. L. Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75:117–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:562–578Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter R.Presidential Decision Making: The Economic Policy Board (1980) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Quinn R., Hunt J. G., Steward R., Schriesheim C., Hosking D. Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward an integrative model. Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behavior and Leadership. (1984) (Paragon, New York) 10–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning N. A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(2):109–127Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–312Link, Google Scholar
• Romanelli E., Tushman M. L. Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(5):1141–1167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothenberg A.The Emerging Goddess (1979) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Sherif M., Hinton B. L., Reits H. J. Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. Groups and Organizations (1971) (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
• Sherif M., Harvey O. J., White B. J., Hood W. R., Sherif C. W.Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment (1961) (University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, Norman, OK) Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. Temoprarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Smith K., Berg D.Paradoxes of Group Life (1987) (Josey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Steiner I.Group Processes and Productivity (1972) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Suedfeld P., Tetlock P., Streufert S., Smith C., Atkinson J., McClelland D., Verof J. Conceptual/integrative complexity. Motivation and Personality: Handbook of Thematic Content Analysis (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) 393–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sull D. The dynamics of standing still: Firestone tire and rubber and the radial revolution. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1999) 73:430–464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sull D., Tedlow R., Rosenbloom R. Managerial commitments and technology change in the US tire industry. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1997) 73:430–464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundaramurthy C., Lewis M. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(3):397–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton R.Weird Ideas That Work (2002) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock P. E., McGraw A. P., Kristel O., Haslam N. Proscribed forms of social cognition: Taboo tradeoffs, blocked exchanges, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Relational Models Theory: A Contemporary Overview (2004) (Erlbaum, Mahway, NJ) Google Scholar
• Thompson J.Organizatons in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (Mcgraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 18(Summer):119–142Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O’Reilly C. A. I. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., O’Reilly C. A.Winning Through Innovation (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Romanelli E., Staw B. M., Cummings L. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior (1985) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 171–222Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Smith W. K., Baum J. Organizational technology. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 386–414Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Smith W., Wood R., Westerman G., O’Reilly C.Innovation Streams and Ambidextrous Organizational Forms (2002) (Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Tyre M., von Hippel E. The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):71–83Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A., Poley D., Garud R., Venkataraman S.The Innovation Journey (1999) (Oxford Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Virany B., Tushman M., Romanelli E. Executive succession and organizational outcomes in turbulent environments: An organizational learning approach. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):72–92Link, Google Scholar
• Voorhees B. Toward duality theory. General Systems Bull. (1986) 16(2):58–61Google Scholar
• Wageman R. How leaders foster self managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):559–577Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(3):280–321Link, Google Scholar
• Walton R. E., McKersie R. B.A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations (1965) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Wegner D., Mullen B., Goethals R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Google Scholar
• Weick K., Staw B. M. Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1979) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 41–74Google Scholar
• Weick K., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):357–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D., Sutton R. I., Staw B. M. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior (1999) (JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 81–123Google Scholar