Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0135

References

  • Abbott A. A primer on sequence methods. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1:373–392LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A.Time Matters (2001) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Anderson P. W., Arthur W. B., Durlauf S. N., Lane D. A. Some thoughts about distribution in economics. The Economy As an Evolving Complex System II (1997) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) 565–567Google Scholar
  • Anderson P. Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:216–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C., Schön D.Organizational Learning (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Arthur W. B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (1989) 99:116–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthur W. B., Durlauf S. N., Lane D. A., Arthur W. B., Durlauf S. N., Lane D. A. Introduction. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II (1997) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) 1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Astley G. W. The two ecologies: Population and community perspectives on organizational evolution. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:224–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási A. L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286:509–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Tolbert P. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18:93–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational founding. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:483–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P., Papenhausen C. Assumptions of rationality and equilibrium in strategy research: The limits of traditional economic analysis. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1:413–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T. Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems (1969) 14:69–85Google Scholar
  • Chiles T. H., Meyer A. D., Hench T. J. Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theaters. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:499–519LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Colwell K. A. Emergence and evolution of alliance networks for commercializing radical innovations: The case of nanotechnology. (2003) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar
  • Colwell K. A., Meyer A. D. Fractal dimensions in interorganizational alliance networks. 12th Annual Meeting Soc. Chaos Theory Psych. Life Sci. (2003) Boston, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Marquis C. Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):332–343LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 1029–1940Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociology Rev. (1983) 48:147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdös P., Rényi A. On the evolution of random graphs. Bull. Inst. Internat. Statist. (1961) 38:343–347Google Scholar
  • Fligstein N. Social skill and institutional theory. Amer. Behavioral Scientist (1997) 40:397–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman J., Meyerand Associates M. The unit of analysis in organizational research. Environments and Organizations (1978) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 335–351Google Scholar
  • Gaba V. Corporate venture investing: A multilevel organizational change perspective. (2002) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar
  • Gaba V., Meyer A. D. The diffusion of corporate venture investing programs: What do prospective adopters observe? (2005) . Working paper, INSEADGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A.Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (1979) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociology (1978) 83:1420–1443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R., Taylor A. Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:54–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:397–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociology (1999) 104:1439–1493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Nohria N., Zaheer A. Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:203–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton J. D.Time Series Analysis (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A., Rao H. Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. Amer. J. Sociology (1997) 102:1606–1651CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A., Russo M. V., Meyer A. D. Institutional environments in flux: The impact of regulatory change on CEO succession, organizational domain, and performance. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:253–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hirsch P. Sociology without social structure: Neoinstitutional theory meets Brave New World. Amer. J. Sociology (1997) 102:1702–1723CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Human S. E., Provan K. G. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:327–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isaac L. W., Griffin L. J. Ahistoricism in time-series analysis of historical processes: Critique, redirection, and illustrations from U.S. labor history. Amer. Sociology Rev. (1989) 54:873–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75:424–440Google Scholar
  • Kilduff M., Tsai W.Social Networks and Organizations (2003) (Sage Publications, London, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krugman P. What economists can learn from evolutionary theorists. (1996) . Talk given to the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy, Antwerpe (November)Google Scholar
  • Leach E. R., Lenneberg E. H. Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal abuse. New Directions in the Study of Language (1964) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 23–63Google Scholar
  • McCann J. E., Selsky J. Hyperturbulence and the emergence of type 5 environments. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:460–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer A. D. Adapting to environmental jolts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:515–537CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer A. D., Brooks G. R., Goes J. B. Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:93–110Google Scholar
  • Meyer A. D., Goes J. B., Brooks G. R., Huber G. P., Glick W. H. Organizations reacting to hyperturbulence. Organizational Change and Redesign (1993a) (Oxford University Press, New York) 66–111Google Scholar
  • Meyer A. D., Tsui A., Hinings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993b) 6:1175–1195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mohr L. B., Mohr L. B. Approaches to explanation: Variance theory and process theory. Explaining Organizational Behavior (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 35–70Google Scholar
  • Mowrey D.U.S. Industry in 2000. Studies in Competitive Performance (1999) (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. J. Management Stud. (1987) 24:649–670CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 183–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prigogine I., Stengers I.Order Out of Chaos (1984) (Bantam Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Roughgarden J.Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction (1996) (Prentice Hall, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schelling T. C.Micromotives and Macrobehavior (1978) (Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R., Ruef M., Mendel P., Caronna C.Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior (1947) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H. Congealing oil: Inventing ideologies to justify acting ideologies out. J. Management Stud. (1982) 18:3–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D., Sine W. D., Baum J. Interorganizational institutions. Companion to Organizations. (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Strang D., Soule S. A. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociology (1998) 24:265–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D., Tuma N. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. Amer. J. Sociology (1993) 99:614–639CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A., Corbin J.Grounded Theory in Practice (1997) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Thornton P. H., Ocasio W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociology (1999) 105:801–843CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:22–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Poole M. S. Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota Research Program. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1:313–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vandale W.Applying Time Series and Box-Jenkins Models (1983) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature (1998) 393:440–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:303–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.