Full-Cycle Micro-Organizational Behavior Research

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0136

References

  • Allmendinger J., Hackman J. R. The more the better? A four-nation study of the inclusion of women in symphony orchestras. Soc. Forces (1995) 74:423–450CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin L., Flynn F. Leadership style and followers’ regulatory focus: Value from fit? (2004) . Working paper, School of Business, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Mullainathan S. Are Emily and Brendan more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(4):991–1014CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Towards theoretical progress. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(1):39–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J., Rubin J.Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts (1985) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J., Rubin J. Z., Lang E. Face saving and entrapment. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1981) 17(1):68–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J., Parachuri S., Idson L. C., Higgins E. T. Regulatory focus and the probability estimates of conjunctive and disjunctive events. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2002) 87(1):5–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown P., Levinson S.Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cable D. M., Judge T. A. Person-organization fit, job choice decisions and organizational entry. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1996) 67(3):294–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannella A. A., Paetzold R. L. Pfeffer’s barriers to the advance of organizational science: A rejoinder. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 2:331–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cappelli P., Sherer P., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. Research in Organizational Behavior (1991) 13(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 55–110Google Scholar
  • Chatman J. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(3):459–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J., Flynn F. The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):956–974CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J., O’Reilly C. A. Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):193–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J., Polzer J., Barsade S., Neale M. Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):749–780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J., Lee G., Carroll G., Harrison J. R. The influence of social networks on cultural transmission and enculturation: An empirical investigation. (2005a) . Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J., Boisnier A., Berdahl J., Spataro S., Anderson C. The typical, the rare, and the outnumbered: Disentangling the effects of numerical distinctiveness and sex-stereotyped tasks on individuals’ perceptions of category salience and performance in groups. (2005b) . Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B., Bickman L. Full-cycle social psychology. Applied Social Psychology Annual (1980) 1(Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 21–47Google Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B.Influence: Science and Practice (1993) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B., Brannigan G. G., Merrens M. R. A full-cycle approach to social psychology. The Social Psychologists: Research Adventures (1995) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 53–72Google Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B., Forgas J. P., Williams K. D. Systematic opportunism: An approach to the study of tactical social influence. Social Influence: Direct and Indirect Processes (2001) (Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA) 25–39Google Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B., Cacioppo J. T., Bassett R., Miller J. A. Low-ball procedure for inducing compliance: Commitment then cost. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1978) 36(2):463–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B., Borden R. J., Thorne A., Walker M. R., Freeman S., Sloan L. R. Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 34(2):366–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Can organizational studies begin to break out of the normal science straightjacket? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(1):1–9LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L.Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance (1964) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • Fine G., Elsbach K. Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory building: Tactics for integrating qualitative field data with quantitative lab data. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2000) 36(1):51–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. J. What have you done for me lately? Temporal changes in subjective favor evaluations. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2003a) 9(1):38–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. J. How much should I help and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Management J. (2003b) 46(5):539–553CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. J., Staw B. M. Lend me your wallets: The effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(2):309–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freid Y., Slowik L. H. Enriching goal-setting theory with time: An integrated approach. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(3):404–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick C. Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(1):9–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick C. Making time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(2):274–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilovich T., Kahneman D., Medvec V. Varieties of regret: A debate and partial resolution. Psych. Rev. (1998) 105(3):602–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilovich T., Vallone R., Tversky A. The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psych. (1985) 17(2):295–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E.Relations in Public (1971) (Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK) Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Cho T. S., Chen M. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(4):659–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison J. R., Carroll G. Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(4):552–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ilgen D., Klein H. Organizational behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. (1989) 40:327–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A., Mannix E. A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):238–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenrick D. T., Funder D. C. Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. Amer. Psychologist (1988) 43(1):23–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn M., Schooler C. The reciprocal effects of the substantive complexity of work and intellectual flexibility: A longitudinal assessment. Amer. J. Sociology (1978) 84(1):24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J. E., McGrath J. E., Martin J., Kulka R. Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. Judgment Calls in Research (1982) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 69–102Google Scholar
  • Mellers B., Hertwig R., Kahneman D. Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psych. Sci. (2001) 1(4):269–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. Idiosyncratic jobs in formal organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32(3):327–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mone M. A., McKinley W. The uniqueness value and its consequences for organization studies. J. Management Inquiry (1993) 2(2):284–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowday R. T., Sutton R. I., Spence J. T., Darley J. M., Foss D. J. Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology (1993) 44(Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA) 195–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen G. A., Waller M. J. Focusing on midpoint transitions: An analysis of boundary conditions. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(5):1056–1067CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly C. A., Spence J. T., Darley J. M., Foss D. J. Organizational behavior: Where we’ve been, where we’re going. Annual Review of Psychology (1991) 42(Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA) 427–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly C., Chatman J., Caldwell D. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(3):487–516CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior (1983) 4(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J. Barriers to the advancement of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(4):599–620CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C., Smith-Lovin L. The gender system and interaction. Annual Rev. Sociology (1999) 25:191–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross J., Staw B. Expo 86: An escalation prototype. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):274–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross J., Staw B. Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(5):701–733CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G. R. Field stimulations for organizational behavior research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24(4):638–649CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider B., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior (1983) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–31Google Scholar
  • Simonson I., Staw B. M. Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(3):419–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singleton R. A., Straits B. C.Approaches to Social Research (1999) 3rd ed.(Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Spataro S. E. Not all differences are the same: The role of informal status in predicting reactions to demographic diversity in organizations. (2002) . Working paper, Yale School of Management OB-03, Yale, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Spataro S. E., Anderson C. Informal status in formal organizations: Differences in respect and prestige among coworkers. (2004) . Working paper, Yale School of Management No. OB-10, Yale, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. Knee-deep in the big muddy. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1976) 16(1):27–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B., Hoang H. Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(3):474–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B., Ross J. Knowing when to pull the plug. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1987) 65(2):68–76Google Scholar
  • Staw B., Sutton R. What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 40(3):371–385Google Scholar
  • Staw B., Barsade S., Koput K. Escalation and the credit window: A longitudinal study of bank executives’ recognition and write-off of problem loans. J. Appl. Psych. (1997) 82(1):130–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R. I. The virtues of closet qualitative research. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):97–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teger A. I.Too Much Invested to Quit (1980) (Pergamon, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tyler T. R., Degoey P. Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1995) 69(3):482–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J. Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organ. Sci. (1995) 15(2):280–321Google Scholar
  • Waller M., Zellmer-Bruhn M. E., Giambatista R. C. Watching the clock: Group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(5):1046–1047CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Starbuck W. H. Theory building in industrial and organizational psychology. Internat. Rev. Indust. Organ. Psych. (1988) 3(1):93–138Google Scholar
  • Zammuto R. F., Connolly T. Coping with disciplinary fragmentation. Organ. Behavior Teaching Rev. (1984) 9(1):30–37Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.