The Impact of Corruption on Entry Strategy: Evidence from Telecommunication Projects in Emerging Economies

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0186

References

  • Ahlstrom D., Bruton G. D. Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Acad. Management Executive (2001) 15(4):72–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beamish P. W., Banks J. C. Equity joint ventures and the theory of the multinational enterprise. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1987) 18(2):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhardan P. Corruption and development: A review of issues. J. Econom. Lit. (1997) 17(3):1–26Google Scholar
  • Boddewyn J. J. Political aspects of MNE theory. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1988) 19(3):119–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boddewyn J. J., Brewer T. L. International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):119–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campos J. E., Lien D., Pradhan S. The impact of corruption on investment: Predictability matters. World Development (1999) 27:1059–1067CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Uhlenbruck K., Weaver K. M. How firms respond to government corruption: Insights from India. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings (2004) (Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA) A1–A6Google Scholar
  • Davis P. S., Desai A. B., Francis J. D. Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2000) 31(2):239–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delios A., Beamish P. W. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(10):915–933CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delios A., Henisz W. J. Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(3):303–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doh J. P. Entrepreneurial privatization strategies: Order of entry and local partner collaboration as sources of competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(3):551–571Google Scholar
  • Doh J. P., Rodriguez P., Uhlenbruck K., Collins J., Eden L. Coping with corruption in foreign markets. Acad. Management Executive (2003) 17(3):114–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunning J. H.Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (1993) (Addison-Wesley, Harlow, UK) Google Scholar
  • Easterly W.The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Economist, The (2002) . Special report: Bribery and business (March 2) 63–65Google Scholar
  • Eden L., Miller S., Hitt M. A., Cheng J. L. C. Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. The Evolving Theory of the Multinational Firm. Advances in International Management (2004) Vol. 16(Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) 187–221Google Scholar
  • Fisman R. Estimating the value of political connections. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(4):1095–1102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman G. M., Helpman E.Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Habib M., Zurawicki L. Corruption and foreign direct investment. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2002) 33:291–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hellman J. S., Jones G., Kaufmann D., Schankerman M. Measuring governance, corruption and state capture: How firms and bureaucrats shape the business environment in transition economies. (2000) . Public Policy Research Paper 2312, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Henisz W. J., Delios A. Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:443–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henisz W. J., Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization-within and between countries. Bus. Politics (1999) 1(3):261–277Google Scholar
  • Heritage FoundationIndex of Economic Freedom (2003) . The Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L.International Business: Competing in the International Marketplace (1994) (Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL) Google Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L., Hwang P., Kim W. C. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(2):117–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoskisson R. E., Eden L., Lau C. M., Wright M. Strategy in emerging economies. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(3):249–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kambhato P., Lieberman I., Kirkness C. The flagship role of telecommunications. Privatization and Emerging Equity Markets (1998) (World Bank, Washington, D.C.) 88–103Google Scholar
  • Kaufmann D., Jain A. K. Research on corruption: Critical empirical issues. Economics of Corruption (1998) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) 129–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T., Roth K. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):215–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T., Zaheer S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(1):64–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LaPorta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Vishny R. The quality of government. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (2000) 15(2):222–279Google Scholar
  • Lenway S. A., Murtha T. P. The state as strategist in international business research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1994) 25(3):513–535CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy B., Spiller P. T. The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1994) 10(2):201–246Google Scholar
  • Mauro P. Corruption and growth. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(3):681–712CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mauro P. Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. J. Public Econom. (1998) 69(2):263–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83(2):340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murtha T. P. Surviving industrial targeting: State credibility and public policy contingencies in multinational subcontracting. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1991) 7(1):117–143Google Scholar
  • Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):145–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pan Y., Tse D. K. The hierarchical model of market entry modes. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2000) 31(4):535–554CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearce J. L.Organization and Management in the Embrace of Government (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng M. W., Heath P. S. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(2):492–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Political Risk Services (PRS)International Country Risk Guide: A Business Guide to Political Risk (2004) (The PRS Group, Inc., East Syracuse, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Radaev V. Informalization of rules in the Russian economy. (2000) . Paper presented at the Annual Conference of International Society for the New Institutional Economics, Tübingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Rajan R. G., Zingales L.Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists (2003) (Crown Business, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Lenway S. A., Govekar M. Management of the political imperative in international business. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(2):141–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodriguez P., Uhlenbruck K., Eden L. Government corruption and entry strategies of multinationals. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(2):383–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose-Ackerman S.Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (1999) (Cambridge University Press, London, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose-Ackerman S. Trust, honesty, and corruption: Theories and survey evidence from post-socialist societies. (2001) . Paper presented at the Workshop on Honesty and Trust in Post-Socialist Societies at the Collegium, Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenzweig P. M., Singh J. V. Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(2):340–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Shleifer A., Vishny R. Corruption. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108:599–617CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shrader R. C. Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: The case of young high-technology manufacturing firms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):45–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smarzynska B., Wei S.-J. Corruption and the composition of foreign direct investment: Firm-level evidence. (2000) . Working Paper 7969, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman M. C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):571–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • TeleGeographyNew International Operators (2000) . TeleGeography, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reforms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 23:22–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Transparency InternationalCorruption Perceptions Index, 2001 (2001) . Transparency International, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Treisman D. The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. J. Public Econom. (2000) 67(3):399–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wei S.-J. Why is corruption so much more taxing than tax? Arbitrariness kills. (1997) . Working Paper 6255, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Westney D. E., Ghoshal S., Westney D. E. Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation (1993) (St. Martin’s Press, New York) 53–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual obligations. J. Law Econom. (1979) 22(2):233–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • World BankWorld Development Report (1999) . Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Xu D., Shenkar O. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 27(4):608–618Google Scholar
  • Yiu D., Makino S. The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):667–683LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.