Acquiring and Applying Knowledge in Transnational Teams: The Roles of Cosmopolitans and Locals

References

• Ai C., Norton E. C. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80:123–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Murninghan J. K. The classics and the contemporary: A new blend of small group theory. Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 225–243Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athanassiou N., Nigh D. Internationalization, tacit knowledge, and the top management teams of MNCs. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2000) 31:471–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bae J., Lawler J. J. Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:502–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett C. A., Ghoshal S.Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (1989) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Baruch Y., Altman Y. Expatriation and repatriation in MNCs: A taxonomy. Human Resource Management (2002) 41:239–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belderbos R. A., Heijltjes M. G. The determinants of expatriation staffing by Japanese multinationals in Asia: Control, learning and vertical business groups. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2005) 36:341–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhagat R. S., Kedia B. L., Harveston P. D., Triandis H. C. Cultural variations in cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:204–221Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J. M., Morrison A. J. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1995) 26:729–754Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjorkman I. W. Barner-Rasmussen, Li L. Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: The impact of headquarters control mechanisms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2004) 35:443–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:875–893Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Coff R., Coff D., Eastvold R. The knowledge leveraging paradox: How to achieve scale without making knowledge imitable. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31:452–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50:352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Earley P. C., Mosakowski E. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:26–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley P. C., Mosakowski E. Cultural intelligence. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82:139–146Google Scholar
• Edstrom A., Galbraith J. R. Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:248–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elron E. Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadership Quart. (1997) 8:393–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Cohen S. B.Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (2003) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Gouldner A. W. Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles—I. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1957) 281–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1993) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:473–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas M. R., Thomas-Hunt M. C., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A. Cosmopolitans and locals: Status rivalries, deference, and knowledge in international teams. Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Status and Groups (2005) Vol. 7(Elsevier, UK) 201–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas M. R. Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Sci. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Haas M. R., Hansen M. T. When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting firm. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R.Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (2002) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Davison S. C., Snell S. A., Snow C. C. When groups consist of multiple nationalities: Towards a new understanding of the implications. Organ. Stud. (1998) 19:181–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P., Kiesler S. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and communication technologies in a large organization. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:373–394Link, Google Scholar
• Hocking J. B., Brown M., Harzing A. A knowledge transfer perspective of strategic assignment purposes and their path-dependent outcomes. J. Human Resource Management (2004) 15:565–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G.Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values (1980) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:88–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson S. E., Hitt M. A., DeNisi A. S.Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage: Designing Strategies for Effective Human Resource Management (2003) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Janis I. L.Groupthink (1982) 2nd ed.(Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 19:791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M.World Class: Thriving Locally in the Global Economy (1995) (Simon and Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Shapiro D. L. The impact of cultural values on employee resistance to teams: Toward a model of globalized self-managing work team effectiveness. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22:730–757Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Gibson C. B., Shapiro D. L. “Exporting” teams: Enhancing the implementation and effectiveness of work teams in global affairs. Organ. Dynam. (2001) 30:12–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1993) 24:625–645Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau D. C., Murninghan J. K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:325–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1477–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:581–596Link, Google Scholar
• Liang D. W., Moreland R. L., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Social Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:384–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord M. D., Ranft A. L. Organizational learning about new international markets: Exploring the internal transfer of local market knowledge. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2000) 31:573–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyles M. A., Salk J. E. Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1996) 27:877–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Cooper L. P., Neece O. E. Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. (2004) 50:174–189Link, Google Scholar
• Makino S., Delios A. Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance formation in Asia. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1996) 30:905–927Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Markus H. S. Kitayama. Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psych. Rev. (1991) 98:224–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski M., Chudoba C. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:473–492Link, Google Scholar
• McEvily B., Perrone V., Zaheer A. Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:91–103Link, Google Scholar
• Mendenhall M., Oddou G. Acculturation profiles of expatriate managers: Implications for cross-cultural training programs. Columbia J. World Bus. (1986) 73:21–28Google Scholar
• Menon T., Pfeffer J. Valuing internal versus external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Sci. (2003) 49:497–514Link, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.Social Theory and Social Structure (1957) 2nd ed.(Free Press, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
• Nohria N., Ghoshal S.The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation (1997) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:100–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ralston D. A., Kai-Cheng Y., Wang X., Terpstra R., We H. The cosmopolitan Chinese manager: Findings of a study on managerial values across the six regions of China. J. Internat. Management (1996) 2:79–109Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow C. C., Snell S. A., Davison S. C., Hambrick D. C. Use transnational teams to globalize your company. Organ. Dynam. (1996) 32(4):20–32Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H. Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:713–741Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton R. I., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:685–718Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1986) 51:273–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triandis H. C. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psych. Rev. (1989) 96:269–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang E. W. K. Managerial learning in foreign-invested enterprises of China. Management Internat. Rev. (2001) 41:29–51Google Scholar
• Tung R. Expatriate assignments: Enhancing success and managing failure. Acad. Management Executive (1987) 1:117–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tung R. American expatriates abroad: From neophytes to cosmopolitans. J. World Bus. (1998) 33:125–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:76–92Link, Google Scholar