Interorganizational Ties and Business Group Boundaries: Evidence from an Emerging Economy

References

• Allen M. P., Panian S. K. Power, performance, and succession in the large corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:538–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida H., Wolfenzon D. A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. J. Finance (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Amsden A.Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (1989) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Aoki M. Toward an economic model of the Japanese firm. J. Econom. Lit. (1990) 28:1–27Google Scholar
• Baker F. B., Hubert L. J. The analysis of social interaction data. Sociol. Methods Res. (1981) 9:339–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barandiaran E., Hernandez L. Origins and resolution of a banking crisis: Chile 1982–86. (1999) . Central Bank of Chile Working Paper 57, Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
• Batjargal B., Liu M. Entrepreneurs’ access to private capital in China: The role of social capital. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:159–172Link, Google Scholar
• Berger P. L., Luckmann T.The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (1966) (Doubleday, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
• Berglöf E., Perotti E. The governance structure of the Japanese financial keiretsu. J. Financial Econom. (1994) 36:259–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard H. R., Killworth P. D. Informant accuracy in social network research II. Human Comm. Res. (1977) 4:3–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard H. R., Killworth P. D., Sailer L. Informant accuracy in social network research IV: A comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive data. Social Networks (1980) 2:191–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bosworth B., Dornbusch R., Laban R.The Chilean Economy: Policy Lessons and Challenges (1994) (Brookings, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Positions in networks. Social Forces (1976) 51:93–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S., Hogarth R. M., Michaud C. The social capital of French and American managers. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:123–147Link, Google Scholar
• Caves R., Uekusa M.Industrial Organization in Japan (1976) (The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Chang S. J., Choi U. Strategy, structure, and performance of Korean business groups: A transactions cost approach. J. Indust. Econom. (1988) 37:141–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis A., Gardner B. B., Gardner M. R.Deep South (1941) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Davis G. F. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:583–613Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Stout S. K. Organization theory and the market for corporate control. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:605–633Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dore R. P.Taking Japan Seriously (1987) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Dutta S.Family Business in India (1997) (Sage Publications, New Delhi, India) . Response BooksGoogle Scholar
• Encarnation D.Dislodging Multinationals: India’s Comparative Perspective (1989) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
• Festinger L., Schachter S., Back K.Social Pressures in Informal Groups (1950) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R. Estimating the value of political connections. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91:1095–1102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flath D. Indirect shareholding within Japan’s business groups. Econom. Lett. (1992) 38:223–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flath D. The Keiretsu puzzle. J. Japanese Internat. Econom. (1996) 10:101–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank K. A. Identifying cohesive subgroups. Social Networks (1995) 17:27–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C., Webster C. M. Interpersonal proximity in social and cognitive space. Social Cognition (1994) 12:223–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C., Freeman S., Michaelson A. G. On human social intelligence. J. Social Biol. Structures (1988) 11:415–425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman S. Verbal response data as predictors of social structure. (1987) . Ph.D. dissertation, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CAGoogle Scholar
• Geertz C. The bazaar economy: Information and search in peasant marketing. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1978) 68:28–32Google Scholar
• Gerlach M. L. The Japanese corporate network: A blockmodel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992a) 37:105–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerlach M. L.Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business (1992b) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P., Khanna T. The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46:35–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P., Lerner J., Morck R. K. The determinants of corporate venture capital success: Organizational structure, incentives, and complementarities. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (2001) (National Bureau of Economic Research and University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78:1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S., Smelser N., Swedberg R. Business groups and social organization. Handbook of Economic Sociology (2005) 2nd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Guillén M. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:362–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillén M. Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–95. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:509–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104:1439–1493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton G.Asian Business Networks (1996) (Walter de Gruyter, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harman H. H.Modern Factor Analysis (1976) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Lifschitz A. Kinship in the shadow of the corporation: The interbuilder network in Clyde River shipbuilding, 1711–1990. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2006) 71:334–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Roberts P. W. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106(2):387–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keister L. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 10:404–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keister L.Chinese Business Groups: The Structure and Impact of Interfirm Relations during Economic Development (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Khanna T. Business groups and social welfare in emerging markets: Existing evidence and unanswered questions. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2000) 44:748–761Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T., Palepu K. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(4):41–51Google Scholar
• Khanna T., Palepu K. Policy shocks, market intermediaries, and corporate strategy: The evolution of business groups in Chile and India. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1999) 8:271–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T., Palepu K. Is group membership profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. J. Finance (2000a) 55:867–891Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T., Palepu K. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long run evidence from Chile. Acad. Management J. (2000b) 43(3):268–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T., Rivkin J. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:45–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T., Wu D. M. Empresas CAP 1994. (1998) . Case 798-053, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Khanna T., Yafeh Y. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. J. Bus. (2005) 78:301–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotkin J.Tribes: How Race, Religion and Identity Determine Success in the New Global Economy (1992) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks (1988) 10:359–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landa J. T.Trust, Ethnicity and Identity: Beyond the New Institutional Economics of Ethnic Trading Networks, Contract Law, and Gift-Exchange (1994) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Google Scholar
• La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance (1999) 54:471–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larraín M. How the 1981–83 Chilean banking crisis was handled. (1989) . Working Paper 300, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Leff N., McKinnon R. Capital markets in the less developed countries: The group principle. Money and Finance in Economic Growth and Development (1976) (Marcel Dekker, New York) Google Scholar
• Leff N. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Econom. Development Cultural Change (1978) 26:661–675Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefort F., Walker E. Corporate governance in Chile: Results and hypothesis. (1999) . Working paper, Escuela de Administracion, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile mimeo, Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln J. R., Gerlach M. L., Ahmadjian C. L. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:67–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. R., Gerlach M. L., Takahashi P. Keiretsu networks in the Japanese economy: A dyad analysis of intercorporate ties. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57:561–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majluf N., Abarca N., Rodríguez D., Fuentes L. A. Governance and ownership structure in Chilean economic groups. Revista ABANTE (1998) 1:111–139Google Scholar
• Miwa Y., Ramseyer J. M. The fable of the Keiretsu. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2002) 11:169–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1996) 22:271–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakatani I., Aoki M. The economic role of financial corporate grouping. The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm (1984) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:129–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett J. F., Ansell C. K. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98:1259–1319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan L.Sons of the Yellow Emperor: The Story of the Overseas Chinese (1991) (Mandarin Paperbacks, Reed International Books, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:458–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger F. J., Dickson W. J.Management and the Worker (1939) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):369–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy D. Efficiency and “the fix”: Informal intergroup relations in a piecework machine shop. Amer. J. Sociol. (1954) 60:255–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxonhouse G. R. What does Japanese trade structure tell us about Japanese trade policy? J. Econom. Perspectives (1993) 7:21–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott J.Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (1991) (Sage, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Simons T., Ingram P. Organization and ideology: Kibbutzim and hired labor, 1951–1965. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:784–813Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strachan H.Family and Other Business Groups in Economic Development: The Case of Nicaragua (1976) (Praeger, New York) Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:315–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ungson G., Steers R., Park S.Korean Enterprise: The Quest for Globalization (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Useem M.The Inner Circle (1984) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:674–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinstein D., Yafeh Y. On the costs of a bank-centered financial system: Evidence from the changing main bank relations in Japan. J. Finance (1998) 53:635–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• White H. C., Boorman S. A., Breiger R. L. Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Amer. J. Sociol. (1976) 81:730–780Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73:519–540Google Scholar
• Winship C., Mandel M., Leinhardt S. Roles and positions: A critique and extension of the blockmodeling approach. Sociological Methodology, 1983–1984 (1983) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo S., Lee S. M. Management style and practice of Korean Chaebols. California Management Rev. (1987) 29(4):97–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeitlin M. Corporate ownership and control: The large corporation and the capitalist class. Amer. J. Sociol. (1974) 79:1073–1119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeitlin M., Ratcliff R. E.Landlords and Capitalists: The Dominant Class of Chile (1988) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar