Manufacturing Relations: An Empirical Study of the Organization of Production Across Multiple Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0190

References

  • Ahmadjian C. L., Lincoln J. R. Keiretsu, governance, and learning: Case studies in change from the Japanese automotive industry. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(6):683–701LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E.Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Pfeffer J. Environments of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1976) 2:79–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Whetten D. A., Nystrom P., Starbuck H. Organization-sets, action-sets, and networks: Making the most of simplicity. Handbook for Organizational Design (1981) (Oxford University Press, London, UK) 385–408Google Scholar
  • Asanuma B. The contractual framework for parts supply in the Japanese automotive industry. Japanese Econom. Stud. (1985) 13(4):54–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W., Faulkner R., Baum J. A. Interorganizational networks. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 520–540Google Scholar
  • Barley S., Freeman J., Hybels R., Nohria N., Eccles R. Strategical alliances in commercial biotechnology. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 311–347Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Haveman H. A. Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):304–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A., Korn H. J. Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:255–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besag J. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (1974) B.36:96–127Google Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Inequality and Heterogeneity (1977) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Boorman S., White H. C. Social structure from multiple networks II: Role structures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1976) 81:1384–1446CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Foster P. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
  • Boston Consulting Group The EC automotive components sector in the context of the single market. (1990) . Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • Bothner M., White H. C., Lomi A., Larsen E. R. Market orientation and monopoly power. Dynamics of Organizations. Computational Modeling and Organization Theories (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 182–208Google Scholar
  • Bradach J. L., Eccles R. G. Price, authority and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1989) 15:97–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breiger R. L., Lounsbury Michael, Ventresca Marc J. Poststructuralism in organizational studies. Social Structure and Organizations Revisited. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2002) Vol. 19(JAI Press/Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 295–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breiger R., Mohr J. Institutional logics from the aggregation of organizational networks: Operational procedure for the analysis of counted data. Computational Math. Organ. Theory (2004) 10:17–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Toward a Structural Theory of Action (1982) (Academic Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraint and Directorate Ties in the American Economy (1983) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Talmud I. Market niche. Social Networks (1993) 15:133–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K., Newell A. The nature of the social agent. J. Math. Sociol. (1994) 19(4):221–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G., Swaminathan A. The organization ecology of strategic groups in the American Brewing Industry from 1975 to 1990. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1(1):65–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cusumano M. A.The Japanese Automobile Industry: Technology and Management at Nissan and Toyota (1985) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cusumano M. A., Takeishi A. Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese-transplant, and U.S. auto plants. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:563–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G., Smelser N., Swedberg R. Firms and environments. Handbook of Economic Sociology (2005) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 478–503Google Scholar
  • Davis G., Greve H. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 103:1–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. Structural analysis of organizational fields: A blockmodel approach. Res. Organ. Behav. (1986) 8:335–370Google Scholar
  • Dyer J. H. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:271–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles R. G., White H. C. Price and authority in inter-profit center transactions. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94(Suppl.):S17–S51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enrietti A. Il settore delle componenti auto: Struttura e dinamica. Economia e Politica Industriale (1995) 88:190Google Scholar
  • Enrietti A., Lanzetti R. Fiat auto: Le ragioni della crisi e gli effetti a livello locale. (2002) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein J., Axtell R.Growing Artificial Societies (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fonti F. One relationship is not enough: An initial view of multiplex embeddedness. (2002) . Doctoral dissertation, Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Frank O., Strauss D. Markov graphs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1986) 81:832–842CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujimoto T., Chandler A. D., Hagström P., Sölvell Ö. Reinterpreting the resource-capability view of the firm: A case of the development-production systems of the Japanese auto-makers. The Dynamic Firm. The Role of Technology, Strategy Organization and Regions (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 15–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. An ecological theory of spatial evolution: Local density dependence in Tokyo banking, 1894–1936. Social Forces (2002) 80:847–879CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):85–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1439–1493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Dialdin D. A., Wang L., Baum J. A. C. Organizational networks. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 281–303Google Scholar
  • Handcock M. S., Hunter D. R. Inference in curved exponential family models for networks. J. Computational Graphical Statist. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Helper S. Strategy and irreversibility in supplier relations: The case of the U.S. automobile industry. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1991) 65:781–824CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helper S., Levine D. I. Long-term supplier relations and product-market structure. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1993) 8(3):561–581Google Scholar
  • Helper S., MacDuffie J. P., Sabel C. Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Indust. Corporate Change (2000) 9(3):443–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herrigel G.Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power (1996) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Holland P., Lienhardt S. An exponential family of probability distribution for directed graphs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1981) 76:33–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imai K., Itami T. Interprenetation of organization and market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1984) 2:285–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do: Coordination, identity and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laumann E., Marsden P. Microstructural analysis in interorganizational systems. Social Networks (1982) 4:329–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laumann E., Galaskiewicz J., Marsden P. Community structures as interorganizational linkages. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1978) 4:455–484CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazerson M. H., Lorenzoni G. The firms that feed industrial districts: A return to the Italian source. Indust. Corporate Change (1999) 8(2):235–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leoncini R., Montresor S. The automobile technological systems: An empirical analisys of four European countries. Res. Policy (2001) 30(8):1321–1340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln J. R., Gerlach M. L., Ahmadjian C. L. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(1):67–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lomi A. The population ecology of organizational founding: Location dependence and unobserved heterogeneity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:111–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lomi A. Markets with hierarchies and the network structure of organizational communities. J. Management Governance (1997) 1(1):49–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lomi A., Larsen E. R. Interacting locally and evolving globally: A computational approach to the dynamics of organizational populations. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):1287–1321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lomi A., Larsen E. R., Baum J., McKelvey B. Evolutionary model of local interactions: A computational perspective. Variation in Organizational Science (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 255–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lomi A., Larsen E. R., Lomi A., Larsen E. R. Failure as a structural concept: A computational perspective on age dependency in organizational mortality rates. Dynamics of Organizations. Computational Modeling and Organization Theories (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 269–303Google Scholar
  • Lomi A., Pattison P. Introduction. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (2004) 10(1):5–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milo R., Shen-Orr S., Itzkovitz S., Kashtan N., Chklovskii D., Alon U. Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science (2002) 298 N(5594):824–827CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S., Schwartz M., Granovetter Mark. Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business (1987) Vol. 1(Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Monteverde K., Teece D. Supplier switching cost and vertical integration in the automobile industry. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13:206–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nishiguchi T.Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pattison P. E., Robins G. L., Stanzelberg R. M. Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociol. Methodology 2002 (2002) (Blackwell, London, UK) 301–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pattison P., Wasserman S. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks, II. Multivariate relationships. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. (1999) 52:169–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pattison P. E., Wasserman S., Hagberg J. Multivariate random graph distributions: Applications to social network analysis. Contributions to Social Network Analysis, Information Theory and Other Topics in Statistics: A Festschrift in Honour of Ove Frank on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday (2002) (University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden) 74–100Google Scholar
  • Pattison P., Wasserman S., Robins G., Kanfer A. Statistical evaluation of algebraic constraints for social networks. J. Math. Psych. (2000) 44:536–568CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Mizruchi M. S., Schwartz M. A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations. Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) 25–55Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancick G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Piore M., Sabel C.The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(4):829–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E. A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociol. (1995) 100(5):1224–1260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E., Hannan M. Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Amer. J. Sociol. (1996) 102:659–689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porac J. H. Thomas, Wilson F., Paton D., Kanfer A. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:203–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., White D. R., Koput K. W., Owen-Smith J. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 110(4):1132–1205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson. Parallel sourcing and supplier performance in the Japanese automobile industry. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:339–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins G. L., Pattison P., Carrington P. J., Scott J., Wasserman S. Interdependencies and social processes: Generalized dependence structures. Model and Methods in Social Network Analysis (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 192–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins G. L., Pattison P., Wasserman S. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations. Psychometrika (1999) 64:371–394CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins G. L., Pattison P. E., Woolcock J. Small and other worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 110(4):894–936CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabel C. F., Smelser N. J., Swedberg R. Learning by monitoring: The institutions of economic development. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 137–165Google Scholar
  • Sako M. Suppliers’ association in the Japanese automobile industry: Collective action for technology diffusion. Cambridge J. Econom. (1996) 20:651–671CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sako M. Supplier development at Honda, Nissan, and Toyota: Comparative case studies of organizational capability enhancement. Indust. Corporate Change (2004) 13(2):281–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian A. L.Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Scott R. W.Organizations: Rational Natural and Open Systems (2003) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Shimokawa K. Japan’s Keiretsu system: The case of the automobile industry. Japanese Econom. Stud. (1985) 13(4):3–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Organizations and markets. J. Econom. Perspectives (1991) 5(2):25–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snijders T. A. B. Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. J. Social Structures (2002) 3(2Google Scholar
  • Snijders T. A. B., Pattison P. E., Robins G. L., Handcock M. S. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol. Methodology (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A., March J. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L., Stinchcombe A. L., Heiner A. C. Contracts as hierarchical documents. Organization Theory and Project Management (1985) (Norwegian University Press and Oxford University Press, Oslo, Norway, and London, UK) 121–171Google Scholar
  • Strang D., Tuma N. B. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 99:614–639CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss D., Ikeda M. Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1990) 85:204–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. H. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):668–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):315–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Pattison P. E. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika (1996) 61:401–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. C.Identity and Control (1992) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • White H. C., Breiger R. L. Pattern across networks. Soc. (1975) July/August):68–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. C., Eccles R., Eatwell J., Milgrates M., Newman P. Producers’ markets. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (1987) Vol. 3(McMillan, London, UK) 984–986Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:269–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E., Smelser N. J., Swedberg R. Transaction cost economics and organizational theory. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 77–107Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract. J. Econom. Perspectives (2002) 16(3):171–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.