Examining Configurations and Firm Performance in a Suboptimal Equifinality Context

References

• Abrahamson E., Fombrun C. J. Macrocultures: Determinants and consequences. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(4):728–755Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J., Hoskisson B. E. Strategic groups: Untested assertions and research proposals. Managerial Decision Econom. (1990) 11:187–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barringer B. R., Harrison J. S. Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. J. Management (2000) 26(3):367–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blair J. D., Fottler M. D., Paolino A. R., Rotarius T. M.Medical Group Practices Face the Uncertain Future: Challenges, Opportunities and Strategies (1995) (Center for Research in Ambulatory Health Care Administration, Englewood, CO) Google Scholar
• Bourgeois L. J. Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 25(1):25–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B.Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit (2004) (Kluwer Publishers, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Lauridsen J., Obel B. Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1461–1485Link, Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Lauridsen J., Obel B. Erratum: Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. (2003) 49(8):1119Link, Google Scholar
• Carpenter M. A., Golden B. R. Perceived managerial discretion: A study of cause and effect. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(3):187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M., Hambrick D. Speed, stealth and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:453–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cool K., Schendel D. Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963–1982. Management Sci. (1987) 33(9):1102–1124Link, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Davis P. S. Porter’s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27:467–488Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A. Industry effects and strategy management research. J. Management (1990) 16(1):7–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Newport S., Rasheed M. A. Configuration research in strategic management. J. Management (1993) 19:775–795Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty D. H., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Van De Ven A. H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(4):514–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R. M., Guffey H. J., Planchon J. M. An examination of the random versus nonrandom nature of item omissions. J. Marketing Res. (1983) 20:305–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith C., Schendel D. An empirical analysis of strategy types. Strategic Management J. (1983) 4(2):153–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilley O. W., Leone R. P. A two-stage imputation procedure for item nonresponse in surveys. J. Bus. Res. (1991) 22:281–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gresov C. Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:431–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gresov C., Drazin R. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):403–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall R. H.Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes (1999) 7th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. Operationalizing the concept of business-level strategy in research. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 5(3):567–575Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: Some conceptual and methodological issues. J. Management (1984) 10(1):27–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. On the staying power of defenders, analyzers, and prospectors. Acad. Management Executive (2003) 17(4):115–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Abrahamson E. Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(5):1427–1441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Finkelstein S., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior (1987) 9(JAI, Greenwich, CT) 369–406Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Finkelstein S., Cho T. S., Jackson E. M., Staw B. M., Kramer R. M. Isomorphism in reverse: Institutional theory as an explanation for recent increases in intraindustry heterogeneity and managerial discretion. Research in Organizational Behavior (2005) 26(JAI Press/Elsevier, Stamford, CT) 307–350Google Scholar
• Hatten K. J., Schendel D. E. Heterogeneity within an industry. J. Indust. Econom. (1977) 26:97–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatten K. J., Schendel D. E., Cooper A. C. A strategic model of the U.S. brewing industry: 1952–1971. Acad. Management J. (1978) 21:592–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawes J. M., Crittenden W. F. A taxonomy of competing retailing strategies. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:275–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hrebiniak L. G., Joyce W. F. Organizational adaptation, strategic choice and environmental determinism. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:336–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennings D. F., Seaman S. L. High and low levels of organizational adaptation: An empirical analysis of strategy, structure, and performance. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:459–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennings D. F., Rajaratnam D., Lawrence F. B. Strategy-performance relationships in service firms: A test for equifinality. J. Managerial Issues (2003) 15(2):208–220Google Scholar
• Kabanoff B., Waldersee R., Cohen M. Espoused values and organizational change themes. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(4):1075–1104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketchen D. J., Shook C. L. The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(6):441–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketchen D. J., Thomas J. B., Snow C. C. Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:1278–1313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketchen D. J., Combs J., Russell C., Shook C., Dean M., Runge J., Lohrke F., Naumann S., Haptonstahl D., Baker R., Beckstein B., Handler C., Honig H., Lamoureux S. Organizational configurations and performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:223–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimberly J. R. Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21:577–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• McGee J., Thomas H. Strategic groups: Theory, research, and taxonomy. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7(2):141–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.On Theoretical Sociology (1967) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83:340–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1175–1195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Miller D. Toward a new contingency approach: The search for organizational gestalts. J. Management Stud. (1981) 18(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:55–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Configurations revisited. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:505–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Friesen P. H. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Sci. (1978) 24(9):921–933Link, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Strategy making in three modes. California Management Rev. (1973) 16(2):44–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Naman J. L., Slevin D. P. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(2):137–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Namiki N. Export strategy for small business. J. Small Bus. Management (1988) 26(2):32–37Google Scholar
• Pennings J. Structural contingency theory: A reappraisal. Res. Organ. Behav. (1992) 14:267–309Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Advantage (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E., Teisberg E. O. Redefining competition in health care. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) June):64–76Google Scholar
• Rich P. The organizational taxonomy: Definition and design. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(4):758–781Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez J. C. The long and thorny way to an organizational taxonomy. Organ. Stud. (1993) 14(1):73–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shortell S. M.Remaking Health Care in America: Building Organizational Delivery Systems (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Thomas J. B., McDaniel R. R. Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and the information processing structure of top management teams. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 33(2):286–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Drazin R., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. The concept of fit in contingency theory. Res. Organ. Behav. (1985) 7:333–365Google Scholar
• Varadarajan P. R., Jayachandran J., White J. C. Strategic interdependence in organizations: Deconglomeration and marketing strategy. J. Marketing (2001) 65:15–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veliyath R., Srinivasan T. C. Gestalt approaches to assessing strategic coalignment: A conceptual integration. British J. Management (1995) 6:205–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:423–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodward J.Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Pearce J. A. Research evidence on the Miles-Snow typology. J. Management (1990) 16:751–768Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zammuto R. F. Organizational adaptation: Some implications for organizational ecology for strategic choice. J. Management Stud. (1988) 25:105–120Crossref, Google Scholar